New "scientific" theory of human origin. Man descended from a pig

60 comments to the note "A new look at the origin of man: the theory of swine genesis"

    do pigs have Rh factor?
    I want to propose to consider the theory according to which a person received part of his genes from a pig, and part from a monkey.
    this can be explained by the absence of intermediate stages of the transition between progenitors and man
    according to this theory, we are all inside a pig, and outside are monkeys (the absence of quotes indicates the absence of a figurative meaning)

    Awesome note! Didn't miss a word! How do you have enough time to study science?

    Nothing worse than any other theory 🙂

    Great compared 😀

    Do not pagadzhusya! People and sapraўdy are great blizkiya and pigs, ale geta not hell with swinagenesis. Aktar karystaetsa obedient to arguments, ale robots unpredictable conclusions. Lichu, INTO Cossack traba is right for "svinafinishu" - chalavetstva degraduy and shepherd pera пtvaraetstsa pigs.

    Thank you all for the comments. If anyone did not understand yet (and the article is full of tips), it was a banter. But with a hint. 😉

    I did not go into the topic in too much detail, although, I suppose, there are many interesting things left.

    Egor, I found your theory here (portal-credo.ru/site/?act\u003dlib&id\u003d2473), it says that pigs have a similar Rh factor.

    Pigs still learn and learn from a man SWORTHY! What some "people" are capable of, pigs are still sooo far away.

    oh, I was already scared, did the doctor, whose authority was undeniable for me, really believed in such a thing.
    but about comparison, this is rightly noticed ... 😆
    by the way, the Darwinian theory, indeed, was refuted on the basis of the different number of chromosomes in humans and monkeys, but there are no other theories, it is still proposed at school 🙁

    Dear lesenka, no one has refuted the Darwinian theory. True, it has been clarified more than once since the time of Darwin ... But in principle, the origin of man from ape in science is not even disputed (all books claiming the opposite were published either by very religious figures, or all sorts of charlatans, and among their authors there is not a single noticeable authority in the field of both biology and paleontology, etc.). Simply put, this is propaganda, not scientific literature... Journalists often publish such propaganda under the guise of scientific data, hence the conviction in "churchly" circles that science has rejected Darwin's theory.

    In humans and apes different number chromosomes. Moreover, the differences in the genetic makeup are very large.

    As I recall, a person with a chimpanzee has a gene discrepancy of about 1%. Whom to believe?

    By the way, what does this even mean? Science claims that all living organisms originated, if not from a single root, then at least from a very few. Consequently, the number of chromosomes often changes during evolution. Man and outwardly looks like a monkey only caricatured, and cannot be genetically identical. Consider the level of brain development and attempts to teach chimpanzees to speak.

    A very convincing and well-argued theory. Strongly different from the "monkey" for the better.
    Thank you very much!
    Now I'll make myself a reference ...

    )) button accordion !!! Bernard Werber wrote a whole book about it !!! "The father of our fathers" !!)) and to be honest about the pig, this is not a joke !!!))

    Precisely, there is such a book. Artistic. So I invented the bicycle. 🙄

    Wonderful article)) It successfully discharges the strain of the brain.

    When they talk about the number of chromosomes in a pig, then in nete there is an opinion that 46 as in humans or 38 !!! Where is the truth!?

    It's hard for me to say. Maybe u different types differently?

    You doctor could help me in this matter, because you have more connections there with people who understand genetics, for me this is really important (I am writing a course book about evolution), but I have no answer to this question .. I am waiting for your help !!!

    If different, then these are already deviations, a person can also have 42 and 44 chromosomes (maniacs, downs, hypersex). It seems like everyone's genus should have a standard number, but certainly not a spread in 8 chromosomes ..

    David, close ties were in the 1st year, and now I am separated from the Department of Biology by more than a dozen kilometers. You will have to independently establish constructive cooperation with the nearest department 🙄

    Thanks! Interesting and funny. But it really wasn't for a long time….

    i liked the article, that's right

    i became interested in this issue just after reading the book by Bernard Werber, because there the theory of "pig genesis" is presented in a VERY understandable form. By the way, it says that the pig is not a direct ancestor of man. According to Werber, from the mating of an ape-like creature and a pig, Something emerged, which then passed on its genes to other monkeys. A certain hybrid of a monkey and a pig is the "missing link" in human evolution.

    Interesting theory 😀 There is something in this 😎 But there are also white spots ... for example, intelligence. The Capuchin monkey is not just a manifestation of intelligence, but a manifestation of resourcefulness, ingenuity .... have you seen a pig with intelligence and ingenuity? or a complex monkey-like hierarchy?

    In addition, the size of the brain of monkeys can be determined by the number of individuals in the flock, the larger the flock, the bigger brain in a certain species, for example, in baboons, the flock has up to 80 individuals. And accordingly the brain size is larger. 🙂

    Although, on the other hand, other animals also have a manifestation of intelligence. For example, there are parrots that can complete the puzzle!

    On the one hand, we are not much like a pig. But on the other hand, the pig does not have such intelligence…. I can assume that the ancestors of the pig and the monkey had a common ancestor, which had a monkey brain and a similar structure, and from the pig a genetic similarity. We are the link that is missing.

    Interestingly, the dolphin's brain is not much larger than ours, I can assume that they are as smart as we are. .. We just do not understand their speech.

    So, we are "not fish and not meat", we are both. Of course it is possible, for the most part this is stupidity 😳, but it may not. 😀

    don't you know? Are we and dolphins alike? at the genetic level ???
    I just think by intellect the first dolphins, elephants ... monkeys .. Maybe dolphins are our ancestors? They all the same, as they say from land, came to the sea 😀

    one material - the result is similar, but different

    at the end of the working week - what the doctor ordered! Hryundel in a puddle with a barrel - lovely !!! 😆

    Studying the pig genome is important for two reasons. On the one hand, these animals are the most important element of human nutrition. On the other hand, in many respects, the pig's organism is close to that of a human, therefore pigs are often used as a human model in the study of diseases and in testing drugs. In addition, wild pigs - the ancestors of the domestic pig - still exist, so further study of their DNA will reveal the genetic manifestations of such an interesting process as domestication.

    People, we have hope! 😆

    Stupid and unfounded theory. Darwin's theory is much more convincing even without "Humor"

    Currently, monkeys do not transform into humans.

    But the pigs, damn it, are turning, right ??? 😕

    As for bathing in mud, by doing so they cleanse the skin, like mud baths, they mostly need it, but we have enough shower. Hippos are fat too, so what?

    All mammals have the same ancestors, of course there will be many similarities. The mentality of a dog and a pig is very similar in similarities. Dogs love comfort too. Kidneys, circulatory system ... And heels, and hooves, and tails, yes, yes, they are also similar. Chimpanzees have well-developed limbs, like humans, skeletal structure, monkeys have the ability to think. Experiments have been carried out and there are suggestions that monkeys have a humble sense of humor.

    Some not convincing article at all, excuse me.

    I don't believe in this theory 😀
    I'm more of an outside interference theory ❗ 😎

    The theory is very interesting. It turns out that people eat their own kind? 😳

    According to the scientific and educational website bokalone.ir (The Irish counterpart of WikiLeaks) scientists have made a stunning discovery that can turn all our ideas about the world in which we live! Two scholars: dean State University Liechtenstein of advanced technologies, the leading geneticist of the World Association of Scientists in Europe - Abrahm Kaarud and his colleague head of the scientific laboratory at the Irish Academy of Sciences in Reykjavik, biomechanic specialist - Tomas O`nil Idi made a sensational discovery ... For 5 years, they carried out a detailed genetic comparative analysis of humans and some mammalian species.

    The conclusion shocked the scientists themselves: It turned out that after a detailed study of the RNA chains (which make up DNA) of a human and a domestic pig, they turned out to be incredibly identical. Moreover, biochemical studies of the structure of constituent amino acids made it clear ... that there is too much in common between a man and a pig to be just a coincidence. Scientists have accurately determined that the difference at the genetic level is less than that of a dog and a cat. The test of PP-acids for the difference in chromosome dissociation led to an even more significant conclusion: This similarity is not accidental and has an artificial origin! As Abram Kaarud himself said: "... complex molecules of fluorine compounds are not naturally occurring .. most likely they were" grafted "into this species, as if crossing human DNA and the DNA of the previous pig species ...", most likely it was an extinct species of mammalian ancestors, the so-called "saber-toothed boars" (maavrus svirus). However, scientists have no idea how such a connection could have occurred, since our technologies are not capable of such operations for the next 50 to 100 years. Moreover, the emergence of a new species had to occur at least 50,000 years ago for the structure to become so natural.

    It is worth noting that scientists highlighted their discovery at the European Closed Conference in Myanmar, on the eve of the collection of laureate candidates Nobel Prize... But not only were they not taken seriously, but they actually threatened to be expelled from all Associations. And the laboratory of the British scientist was completely closed under the pretext of a general reconstruction of the building with a written notification from the Irish city planning authorities! When it first appeared, the article by the scientists themselves on the bokalone.ir site immediately disappeared, and the site's server collapsed and has not yet been restored. The article appeared on March 18th. Already many residents of Europe and America, having learned this news, are ready to take to the streets and demand coverage of the truth.

    Characteristically, the complete lack of coverage of this event in the media. Not a single publication published or showed this discovery! We are on the verge of global change
    After all, now the fact is quite obvious - man did not appear on earth by himself in the course of evolution. And the existence of developed life forms has been proven long before the appearance of man!

    And here is what was written in the personal blog of Abram Kaaruda (who, for some unknown reason, is not loading at the moment) three days before the article appeared on the Irish site: “I'm afraid that we will open Pandora's box ... we will turn the World. And maybe it will turn upside down and we will never be the same. But it is our duty and destiny to do it, with Thomas, first ... ".

    The incredible discovery of scientists is truly the greatest of all made in the history of mankind. And the main thing is that these studies and their results cast a shadow on almost all knowledge of this very story. All cultural, religious teachings and trends will now be examined from the side of new evidence. And the search for the meaning of life and the mystery of the origin of life on Earth is gaining new speed and turns us in the other direction on the path of achieving true knowledge!

    International organization "Scientists for People (Russian Branch)"

    Get out! It turns out that for making xenoskin we rip the skin off practically from our blood relatives! 😯
    By the way, have you come across comparative studies of the composition and time evolution of human and pig's milk? This is where the metabolism would be 100% similar. 💡

    The pigs got out into the people. It is now clear why Muslims and Jews do not eat pork. Eating pork is cannibalism.

    The article is interesting, but why only a pig, when you can offer a bear, which, like a person, eats both meat and fruits and has similar internal structure and what makes him closer to a person is he can walk. By mental capacity, a bear can outwit a man, at least his brains are not like that of a pig, he thinks that something amiss will not seem a little.

    The rational content of the "pig hypothesis" is revealed in the theory of the origin of man from semi-aquatic - semi-terrestrial coastal monkeys - Nayapitheks. It opposes both the traditional and Darwin's view of human ancestors as hairy, brainless and clumsy on earth forest natives to the savannah, and the scandalous “water hypothesis” of A. Hardy, the removal of people from coastal amphibious “naked monkeys”. - See Nayapitkovaya origin of man. - on the site mari-el.ru/homepage/ibraev These hairless riverine and lakeside monkeys in their way of life, and therefore in physiology, had many similarities with pigs.

    The Vatican knew about America long before Columbus. Today I think there is much more that our sages never dreamed of. Recent DNA studies have shown that humans and chimpanzees diverged about 5 ml years ago. During this time, having mutated, a person has learned to have sexual contact with everything that moves, there is everything that can be put into the mouth, etc. Man invented slavery, concentration camps, GMOs, pedophilia, homosexuality, began to explore space. As a result, people will find heaven and hell and remake them in their own way. 😆

    Insulin, hemoglobin, skin structure are very similar in humans and pigs, and differ in humans and chimpanzees. But in evolutionary teaching there is another concept of similarity in morphological characteristics... Because the ancestor of pigs and the ancestor of humans had the same habitat - aquatic (coastal), then the processes were the same - the form of hemoglobin, feeding mainly on fatty and protein foods, as a result, they lost insulin resistance, which then had to be returned to battle in the process of further anhydrous evolution. By the way, a person, unlike hippos and pigs, thanks to water, acquired the current human features - a bell-shaped nose (water does not pass into the nasopharynx), a large brain (it took a long time to dive, and nature tries to create an excess for survival, i.e. if, as a result of oxygen starvation, the brain lost 30% of the cells, then the remaining ones could exist), smaller genitals in women compared to female chimpanzees (a male in water will not see anything 😳 and from a hygienic point of view in water there is no need for large genitalia, those monkeys who do not agree just died). The windpipe, located below the nasopharynx, allows you to inhale quickly and hold your breath for a long time. Well, as a result of this, a person became able to talk. Those. make an articulate speech due to the ability to hold your breath. Walking upright is also water. Large breasts of women could float themselves and contain more milk. Walking upright in the water and the way the baby was fed determined the nature that people have 2 nipples and not 4 or 6.

    How can you explain that all other animals are adapted to their habitat, and a person cannot survive in the cold or extreme heat without clothes for two days? For those who come from water, we have too delicate skin and a respiratory system unsuitable for the aquatic environment, the lack of the necessary layer of fat in babies to withstand low temperatures and too large a brain volume ... no, we are clearly guests from the outside, mutated or changed with the help of a "henchman" material. Pigs or monkeys do not drive cars and do not smoke)) We are too different from everything that lives on Earth. We, of course, adapted to external conditions, as evidenced by the rudiments of the tail and the rudiments of fangs, but the presence of intelligence and technology distinguishes us too much from other species. I don’t think that if we manage to cross a pig with a monkey, we will get a human, the mechanism of interspecies incompatibility again. We are aliens who have forgotten where they came from, or highly evolved mutants. But, in any case, an undesirable species, since we are gradually killing the planet, for which we are degenerating.

    Neither Darwin's theory nor biblical creation theory should be challenged. These two processes must be taken as complementary in the creation of man as a species. Suppose that we flew to a foreign planet to extract some raw material, but the living conditions do not suit us in any way. And monkeys uselessly climb the trees of that planet! They would go to the mines, but the teams do not understand. We would take a gorilla, she is strong, supplement her lack of abilities from our gene pool, add useful genes from other inhabitants of this planet and get a wonderful creature that understands our commands, inclined to organize and knows how to organize their own kind for our benefit! And no discomfort! If the look turns out to be unstable, take other ingredients, chimpanzees, for example, or an orangutan! Does this architecture remind you of anything? You can add a bit of a pig or a dog to sharpen the desired characteristics. And then fly once in a couple of thousand years to collect the "honey" that the "bees" have trained. It’s time to agree with Sitchin that our honey, watered with blood and sweat, is called Gold! For thousands of years we have been putting it in heaps and stuffing it from small heaps into large heaps and everything that we do - everything for his beloved! I wonder what the beekeeper does with the beehive if he stops giving honey? This scenario of events is applicable to us unconditionally. And it is from this bell tower that one should judge about the events taking place in the world. We study the past to know the future, we rummage in our genes to find out who we are. And in the end - we will find a destination!

    So the legion of demons in the herd of pigs asked for a reason, apparently (Gospel of Luke 8: 26-39). It is desirable for them to take possession of a person, but during exile, it seems, they wanted to go to the nearest inferior family.

    I hate people who are trying to "refute" Darwin 😆. None of the scientists of his time, or even to this day, gave as much evidence as Darwin did. He didn't have the Internet and all that ... so don't say that his theory is not correct. By the way, the pig is a human-bred breed! And gorillas are very similar to people. In general, it is easiest to say that people descended from pigs and behave like "ancestors". It is more important not from whom we came, but for what .. if you think that in order to be lazy, eat and sleep, then you definitely descended from pigs.

    Co school years we know that man allegedly descended from a monkey. Nobody remembers how it actually happened, but everyone repeats Darwin's words.

    “Darwin didn't say that.

    Vika, I respect your opinion, but why at the moment the monkey is not turning into a human.
    it would be better if no one knew the origin of man.

    But it may be quite the opposite - not pigs are the ancestors of man, but man is the ancestor of the pig. In Shemshuk's book "Baba Yagi - who are they" tells about the omnipotence of our ancestors, who could turn an enemy into any animal with a word. This has remained in our memory: the battles were formerly called BRANCH. During the battle, there were many wounded - monsters who were nursed in monasteries. So many animals appeared. That is why there are so many overlaps in genetics.

    Thanks. I haven't laughed like that for a long time. I was always surprised and outraged by the amount of garbage in places of rest and swimming. Moreover, people who throw garbage, spit, etc., then more than once visit this place. Swine genesis, not otherwise.

    Very interesting theory) Thank you. I think to include it in my report at the conference "Man and the World". Let's laugh with the faculty)

    Verbera ("The Father of Our Fathers" on the theory of pig genesis) read. - The writer, as always, competently and convincingly uses any borderline themes for his conduct. But still, this theory has the same weaknesses as the theory of origin from ape. I suggest looking wider and not poking your nose with pigs, primates, bears, dolphins. - The whole world from stone to man at the atomic level consists of one material. Differences are a matter of combining this "building material".

    The composition of matter is incredibly simple. All visible matter in the universe - on Earth and in space - consists of three different kinds of fundamental particles: electrons and two types of quarks. bruma.ru/enc/nauka_i_tehnika/fizika/CHASTITSI_ELEMENTARNIE.html

    I saw the title of this article and was horrified! I read it ... I'm just shocked! The author of the site is definitely smart manbut he is not competent in evolutionary theories. I just want to tell you that today, according to the toxonomic classification, man is not something that descended from a monkey ... He remained so.

    No one from scientists, anthropologists, evolutionists and others says that the monkey is stuck on the path of evolution, no, it has improved and is improving to this day, only all this is happening in a different direction. It is not correct to say that we descended from a monkey, or more correctly - from a common ancestor with a monkey! Here is such a small detail, known for a long time, but which most people like to confuse! From this came such a delusion: "why did the monkeys not become people ?!" The monkey is another branch of evolution! It’s a kind of big tree, where bifurcation on the bifurcation is very common, just like in a pulmonary tree!

    And the very idea that there are no transitional forms between a man and an ancestor ape is also erroneous is not valid! They are, and therefore a theory is a theory, not a hypothesis!

    but what if the monkey came down from the tree and saw a pig 😯, it is clear from what angle 😆, and the pig turned its face so slightly to the side, looked with its blue eye from under its long eyelashes at the monkey 😛 ... here it is not far from sin 😳 ..

    I don't even know what amused me more, the article itself or the comments. It's a shame only for Darwin's theory, which no one has formulated so correctly. This theory does not at all claim that man descended from a monkey. It is only asserted that man and the monkey had a common ancestor, after which there was a division into species with all the ensuing differences. (And there was a common ancestor with the pig in the same way, only much earlier.) And there is plenty of evidence for this theory at the moment, which is why it is taught at school. Only apparently bad.

    Lubomyryou don't even know how right these scientists are. There is only one thing but ... These are pigs descended from humans ... read Vladimir Pyatibrat .. so eating pork is really cannibalism.

From school years, we know that man allegedly descended from a monkey. How it really was, no one remembers, but everyone repeats Darwin's words. There are theories about the extraterrestrial origin of man, including the Divine, but we will not talk about metaphysics now.

After much thought, I came to the conclusion that man is descended from a pig. The monkey theory is a lie! A pig is closer to a person not only in a biological, but also in a socio-cultural aspect.

Biological similarity

Scientists have found that the human and pig organisms are in many ways similar in their structure and a number of physiological characteristics. So, blood vessels, especially arteries, in pigs are very similar to humans. The content of hemoglobin and proteins in the blood, the size of erythrocytes also almost coincide. The structure of the skin is also surprisingly similar, so pigs - the only pets - can sunbathe. The structure of the dental system, morphology and physiology of the kidneys, the structure of the eyes, anatomy and physiology of the cardiovascular system and digestion are very similar. For example, a pig's heart weighs 320 g, a human's weighs 300, lungs 800 and 700, respectively, kidneys 260 and 280, liver 1600 and 1800 g.

Insulin for the treatment of diabetes mellitus has in the past been isolated from the pancreas of cattle and pigs. Curiously, beef insulin differs from human insulin by 3 amino acids, while pork insulin differs by only one. But nowhere is it written that insulin is obtained from the glands of monkeys.

The pig is one of the best models in biomedical research in the study of human cardiovascular diseases, diseases of the skin, nervous system and digestion. The effects of radiation and alcohol, drugs and drug dosing are being studied in pigs.

Sociocultural similarities

Pigs have the same problems as people - laziness, gluttony, excess weight, untidiness, physical inactivity, an excessive desire for comfort. Nobody forces the pigs to gorge themselves. Have you ever seen obese monkeys enjoying themselves in the mud?


Laziness, excess weight, untidiness, lack of exercise, excessive striving for comfort.

Discussion

The absence of intermediate stages of the transition between the pig and the person cannot serve as a refutation of the theory of swine genesis, since those are not found in monkeys (as far as I know). Currently, monkeys do not transform into humans.

Indirect evidence the theory of pig genesis is the results of observations of representatives of people who have undergone alcohol intoxication. It is known that alcohol suppresses the mechanisms of control and self-criticism on the part of consciousness, bringing us closer in terms of organization to our distant ancestors.


The pigs lie in the mud.


People are like pigs under the influence of alcohol.

conclusions

At a joint meeting of the Scientific Society of Janitors and the Society of Cleaning Women, the concept of swine genesis was unanimously approved and recommended for further study.


The pig bathes in the mud.


People create trash.
Perhaps it is a subconscious need to bathe in it.

It is safe to say that the theory of pig genesis was hushed up for many years in the scientific world... It is possible that this is a worldwide conspiracy. There is also reason to believe that the swine flu virus was specially synthesized in secret laboratories in order to alienate us from our ancestors. However, it will not be possible to hide the historical truth.

In ancient times, in China and Egypt, pigs were considered saints, a symbol of prosperity and happiness. Until now, ancient sculptures of the Indian deity Vishnu have been preserved in the form of a boar lifting the earth. In ancient Italy, the pig was considered a symbol of fertility and was a sacrificial animal. In the Greek city of Miletus, there is a monument to the wild boar, erected 2000 years ago, and a monument to a pig is also installed in the Danish port of Aarhus and in the center of the capital of Thailand.

Photo: Shutterstock

Man descended from the union of a pig and a monkey, according to Eugene McCarthy, a researcher at the University of Georgia, USA, according to the Daily Mail.

Professor McCarthy, a specialist in interspecies crossing, put forward a hypothesis about the close relationship between man and pig. The scientist does not dispute the relationship between humans and monkeys, however, in his article published on the website macroevolution.net, he indicates that humans and pigs have a lot of similar signs.

McCarthy believes that the man got thick subcutaneous fat, protruding nose, light eyes and hairless skin from pigs. He also noted similarities in the structure of internal organs: it is known that the skin and heart valves of domestic pigs can be transplanted into humans.

So the scientist came to the idea that man is the result of the union of a male pig and a female chimpanzee.

The hypothesis has been criticized both by supporters of the evolutionary theory of the origin of species, and by "creationists".

The greatest doubt among scientists is the fact that chimpanzee and pig cubs can produce fertile offspring. Even when a donkey and a horse are crossed, their offspring are sterile.

9tv.co.il

This idea is not new: "Say:" Shall I not tell you something more evil than this, according to Allah's reward? The one whom Allah cursed and who was angry with, and made of them monkeys and pigs, and who worshiped tagutu. These are more malicious in their place and more strayed from the level path. "

Similar articles

2020 liveps.ru. Homework and ready-made tasks in chemistry and biology.