Knutov Yuri Albertovich Biography. Yuri Knutov: exacerbation to the limit

Past for more than half a century from the moment that on May 1, 1960 near Sverdlovsk (now Ekaterinburg), the flight of the American spy aircraft was completed U. -2 With a pilot Francis Gary Powers, did not make a final clarity in this story. Moreover, such a situation is characteristic of the United States and Russia (former USSR), which directly participated in it. However, the reasons for the continuing "struggle of opinions" are very different from each other. On the basis of the recently declassified documents in the United States, the military historian and director of the Museum of Air Fuel adherence, Yuri Knutov, believes that the events of our time are based on unprecedented disputes. Below the readers are proposed to the conclusions and opinion of the author, based on facts that are confirmed by historical documents.

Spies Lockheed U-2 (Program spy Plane. - A spy aircraft) From 1956 to May 1, 1960, 24 reconnaissance flights were made over the territory of the USSR and photographed 15% of Soviet territory. Francis Powers on U-2 had the biggest raid and tweaked in the airspace of other countries, including 6 times the USSR. The route of the spying aircraft (the program "Flight" ran out over a missile test site of Tyurats (Baikonur), Chelyabinsk, South Sverdlovsk (Kyshtym, the Lighthouse plant), North-west Kirov, through Plesetsk and Severodvinsk, North-west of Kandalaksha, North to Murmansk landing in Budo (Norway). The flight U-2C was held at an altitude of 20 km into account known positions of the zenith rocket division (VDDN) C-75. The aircraft was equipped with an instrument for registering radio and radar radiation, with a sliding camera, a complex of interference with radar sightsets of Soviet fighters and air-air missiles. The design and special coating reduced the radar visibility of the spying aircraft.

Powers got a frequently broken plane, the departure of which due to bad weather over the northern regions of the USSR has been repeatedly transferred from April 28 to May 1, 1960. Autopilot came out in flight, the car lost stability and POUERS continued to perform the assignment in manual mode by radio compass . According to the official version, the U-2 spy airplane in the Sverdlovsk area (Yekaterinburg) entered the zone of defeat 2 VDNs (57 anti-aircraft missile brigade - SRI) under the command of Major Voronov and was shot down.

After one and a half years of the conclusion of Powers in exchange for the Soviet intelligence officer Rudolf Abel was released and in March 1962 gave testimony in the Senate Committee on Armed Forces. On two wooden models U-2, one of which had removable wings and tail, he demonstrated the process of destruction of the aircraft after the rocket undermined. Powers was justified, but most Americans considered the pilot a traitor who did not blow up U-2 and did not commit suicide with him with the help of poison.
In 1998, the CIA declassified a number of flight documents on the flight of the spy, and in 2006 Russia passed the United States a copy of the documents on the Power Process. Langley understood that Powers hid from the KGB communication system with its base, names of managers and other important information, and disclosed uncompaired from the point of view of US intelligence details.

A hype Around the Powers flight rose in 2012 due to the Pentagon plans to abandon the use of U-2 in favor of the RQ-4 Global Hock unmanned strategic intelligence officer (Block 30) of Northrop Grumman. It threatened Lockheed Martin Corporation with multimillion losses and to save U-2 in the ranks for another 10-20 years needed weighty arguments. But by that time, one such an aircraft was shot down on 10.27.1962. Above Cuba with Soviet rackets, and over China, according to the United States, from 1959 to 1972, 11 cars were lost from 15 U-2 for various reasons. Therefore, materials with a revived version that U-2 was not shot down near Sverdlovsk, and fell due to technical malfunction, turned out to be quite by the way. As a conclusion - U-2S in its latest modification is a wonderful aircraft and another ten years can be used for flights over countries with a weak air defense. The Lockheed Martin, the high-altitude strategic U-2S strategic scouts in the amount of 32 units due to the "high service cost" RQ-4 Global Hock remained to 2024.

Simultaneously with the United States, interest in the incident with Powers again arose in Russia. However, if the Americans were important to know, "guilty or not", our researchers wondered "who exactly shot down the Powers plane"?
In the newspaper "Military Industrial courier" (MIC, №1 dated January 8, 2013) in articles B.K. Samoilova ("So who hit Francis Powers?") And P. Old ("Notes of Obustry") The authors are trying to convince readers in the fact that U-2 was amazed by the rocket of the 5th VDN (37 SPR) of Lieutenant Colonel I.I. Novikova. But besides B.K. Samoilova and P. Old Lives and other eyewitnesses who personally saw the destruction of U-2. And the military personnel of the 2nd VDN (57 SIP) Major Voronov is insulting in old age to read articles that they are undeservedly carry their awards. I also did not find a response in these articles on the main question - how the S-75 SNC is Lieutenant Colonel Novikova could destroy the American spy plane?

At the end of 2010, in electronic and printed media (MPC No. 4 of 1.02.2012) B.K. Samoilov published articles with schemes. They are depicted as a rocket 13D of the Novikov Division on a distance of about 60 km knocks U-2. As a specialist, I want to clarify the readers that the far boundary of the Zone of the defeat of the S-75 S-75 "Desna" during shooting at an altitude of 20 km is 29 km (horizontal range - 21 km). According to Samoilov, it turns out that the rocket B-750 (it is 11D and with small changes 13D) was not self-balanced in the 60th second after the start, without fuel and air flew about 40 km and destroyed the spy near the position of the 2nd VDDs ( 57 PRI) Major Voronov in the area of \u200b\u200bArt. Kosulino. I argue - a rocket 13d to knock down the target for a distance of about 60 km cannot!

According to another version based on publication S.B. Selina "The intruder is destroyed. But, how and by whom? " (MIC №11 for 21.03.2012, №13 for 04.04.2012 d), the U-2 aircraft was shot down by the rocket of VDNs of Lieutenant Colonel Novikov. For the correct understanding of the events it should be noted that the distance between Divisions Voronov and Novikova on the map is 67.5 km. At the same time, the fall in the debris of the U-2 wreckage and the landing of Powers is 60-80 km from the VDNN Novikov and near VDN Voronov.

According to opponents of the official version of the destruction of U-2, after defeating the rocket of the Novikov Division rocket for a distance of 26-28 km (horizontal 16.5-19.6 km), the plane collapsed. At the same time, his debris flew in a strange way even more than 40 km (the tail plumage is about 60 km) and in the form of a collapsed aircraft lay down in the area of \u200b\u200bArt. For some reason, it is not from the west to the east, and from the north to south (the fallout scheme is shown in the article B.K. Samoilova "Mystery of the first of 1960", MPC No. 4 of 1.02.2012). The residues of the casing of the 13D Division of Novikov also successfully overcame about 50 km and collapsed near the Voronov Division. But at the same time, opponents silent that Powers himself landed at the parachute itself in the zone of the defeat of the Novikov Division, where it would be shot down, and not far from the position of the 2nd VDN Voronov. There is a harmonious question, does Powers flew like an engine about 40 km, and suddenly opened the parachute for landing on the collective farm field near the art. Kosulino?

The main argument in favor of its versions B.K. Samoilov, S.B. Celine and P. Starun consider the issuance of the K-3 team. In the study manual "Rocket technique SPR" in 1963, it was said that "Schmel's radar fuse" is intended to undermine the combat part of the rocket for the goal when the rocket span relative to the target of up to 60 meters, the angles of the meeting from 60º to 180º and the relative speeds 600-1500 m / sec. " At the same time, "the full inclusion of the radio drive is carried out by the team of long-running K3 (for 300-400 m to the target) supplied from the ground along the radio control of the rocket, in which the third stage of protection is removed." In the case of a span of a rocket past the target at the "distance exceeding the limit range of the radio transmissioner (60 m), the self-diagnosis of the rocket in the air is occurred using time mechanisms ..." After 60 s + 3 s after start. After the self-destruction of the rocket, its fragments create an illumination on the indicators of the SNR and an inexperienced combat calculation can take them for the destroyed target. Such cases were quite a few in the initial period of the War in Vietnam.

In the second half of 2012, the third version of the defeat of the U-2 aircraft Division Novikov, based on the report of the NSA, appeared. In the declassified message, the penkovsky traitor says that none of the Soviet missiles could have a spy plane. His tail plumage and wings could be damaged by an explosive wave during self-yields of one of the missiles, and Powers from a sharp push to get a concussion of the brain. Perhaps this story was invented in the CIA to justify the failure of the GRAND SLAM operation and the "inadequate" actions of the pilot. In the same report, it is noted that if U-2 flew to 1-1.5 km to the right, then the plane rocket would not begin at all, which corresponds to reality.

In 1998, the historians of the Center for Intelligence Exploration at the CIA Gregory W. Pedlow (Gregory W. Pedlow) and Donald E. Welzenbach (Donald E. Welzenbach) released the book "CIA and U-2 Program, 1954-1974", previously having a vulture "for administrative use". Initially, Langley was believed that the plane fell due to an error of a pilot or a malfunction, so when the rocket is exploded, the tail plumage was damaged. Upon returning to the US, Powers passed the many hours of inspections of doctors, conversations with colleagues, interrogations of CIA agents and voluntary testing on a polygraph. Based on this information and photographs of the parts of a bound aircraft made at the exhibition in Moscow, the U-2 aircraft designer Kelly Johnson recognized Powers testimony by trustworthy. He expressed the idea of \u200b\u200bfalling U-2 because of the Soviet MiG-19 who had flown near him (actually SU-9). Such a case occurred over Germany in September 1956, when two Canadian fighters thus destroyed fragile U-2.

AnB disagreed from the CIA. Listening to the negotiations of the Soviet military dispatchers, it concluded that the U-2 in the area of \u200b\u200bSverdlovsk was at the beginning, then sharply turned back and then fell south-west of the city. These and other information in the aggregate with the scheme S.B. Selina was used by opponents of the official version of the destruction of U-2. In their opinion, after the explosion of the rocket of the Novikov Division, the aircraft flew over 40 km, collapsed from overloads and fell not far from the Voronov Division.

Such an approval looks plausible, but unconvincing, as it arises a legitimate question about the wreckage U-2. Anyone in the central museum of the Armed Forces in Moscow can see individual parts of the spy aircraft, similar to the tea cite, which for considerations of secrecy were not shown at the metropolitan exhibition in May 1960. In the first rockets, the S-75, the combat part of the fragmentation A directional action weighing 190 kg with an angle of dividers 90-95% of its fragments within 10-11 degrees. This explains the absence of scaffolds on most of the fuselage and wings of a scouting aircraft. On the destruction of U-2 immediately after the undermining of the BC Zur they say and declassified in 2002 documents of the CIA on the interrogation of 13.02.1962. Powers.

According to the pilot, in flight, except for the autopilot turned off, everything worked well. According to his feelings, the explosion was behind and the right of the cabin. After attempts to align the car Powers realized that there is no tape plug control and cut off the tail. The fall of the aircraft with a strong rotation spoke about the absence of wings that pretended and torn under the onslaught of the air flow. Powers hung on belts head down and could not erase. At an altitude of 10,000 meters, he opened the lamp of the cabin, but due to overloads, the aircraft undermining the mechanism was unable. By 5000 m, Powers broke off the oxygen hose, separated from the aircraft and began the descent on automatically opened parachute.

According to the pilot, the long alignment and the subsequent flight of the aircraft was not, and at an altitude of 20 km U-2 collapsed and immediately began to fall down. Going down on the parachute, Powers saw a large fragment of an airplane, which sailed in the air, like a sheet of tree. According to the company-developer Lockheed Skunk Works (secret branch of Lockheed), the early U-2 models had bad stability and at an altitude of 20 km with a decrease in speed by 19 km / h relative to the cruising aircraft began to fall. Undermining the BC Zur near the tail was the cause of the defeat U-2 by fragments and an explosive wave. The plane entered a flat corkscrew, turned 180 degrees. and collapsed when falling.

Of great interest is the article to the 50th anniversary of the Powers flight in the English newspaper "The Times" of May 1, 2010. The world's leading specialist in the history of the National Security Council and the US National Security Expert (Matthew Aid) reported that American radio electronic intelligence reporting The US government and the CIA on the fate of the Powers aircraft, was wrong. Therefore, much of the fact that the pilot U-2 spoke on interrogations to Langley, was considered to be disinformation that the KGB inspired Powers under hypnosis or with the help of psychotropic drugs. In fact, according to Matthew Eid, the NSA did not understand the situation and adopted a fighter MiG-19 Senior Lieutenant Safronov, who fell in Degtyarsk, south-west of Sverdlovsk. Washington actually recognized the guilt of the NSA and "for exceptional loyalty" on June 15, 2012 posthumously awarded F.G. Powers of the third largest in the US medal is a silver star, which was handed over the grandchildren and granddaughter of the American pilot.

After the publications of opponents, I returned to the official version of the events published in the article "The Ripping Puzzle first of 1960" ("MPK" No. 17 of 02.05.2012 and No. 18 dated 09.05.2012). B.K. Samoilov, who served in 5 VDDN (37 SPR) by Lieutenant technician, in the article "The Fourth of 1960" (MIC No. 4 dated 1.02. And No. 5 of 8.02.2012) reported that the P-12 radar was not verified New NRZ-10 identification equipment ("His Alien"). He also notes that the data of the target designation, which came from the headquarters of 37 SPR commander 5 VDDN Novikov, differed from these Division radar P-12. Novikov doubted the work of the NRZ and clarified the coordinates of the U-2 several times, which was already removed from the division. Commander 37 Brigades confirmed the decision on the shelling of the goal.

At the same time, the Soviet interceptor Su-9 Captain I.A. was in the air. Mentyukova raised by the personal director of Colonel-General E.Ya. Savitsky for the taran of the spying aircraft. In the Scheme with the wiring of the RTV, it is clear that the highways U-2 and SU-9 intersect. Taking into account the absence of 5 VDDs (37 SPRs), a serviceable instrument of identification of the goals "His Alien" it is confidently to say that for the purpose of its radar P-12, the combat settlement of Lieutenant Colonel Novikov became mistakenly accompanied by the Su-9 Captain Mentyukova plane .

It also confirms the story of I.A. Mentyukova. According to him, not well-thought-out teams from the ground and the nervous situation led to the loss of aircraft speed, the dimensions of the Su-9 to the height of 15 km, the actions on the exit from the fire zone of the SIRV and the re-entering on the ram. The pilot also speaks about outbreaks ahead (from the torch of the rocket started) and on the right (from the explosion of self-deceived zur) at the rate of the aircraft. During a turn over the lesion zone 5, VDNN Novikova Su-9 was "lost" by our radar (red dotted line shows a possible SU-9 route on the RTV wiring diagram). Then Mentyukov received an order due to the lack of fuel to sit on the Rolling airfield.

But Lieutenant Colonel V.N. gave the most detailed information about the shelling of SU-9. Samsonov in the memoirs "Who shot down Powers", published in 2004 on that day Samsonov was at the command clause of the 4th separate air defense army. According to him, the Corps commander Colonel Savinov did not know about his aircraft in the air and was convinced of the defeat of the U-2 division Novikov. After application on the large-scale map of the dislocation of missile divisions, the fall of the residues of missiles and the tracks of the flight of their Savin fighters recognized the error. According to memories V.N. Samsonova, Mentyukov's plane came out of the shelling zone on time, and the rocket was independent. Another reason for the shelling SU-9 could be the wrong installation on the aircraft identification codes. As a result, on the screens of Soviet radar, he was displayed as an opponent aircraft.

According to found factory numbers, the fragments of rockets were documented that the U-2 aircraft was shot down by a rocket of 11d SA-75 SA-75 "Dvina", which was in service with 2 VIDN (57 SIP) Major Voronov. A 5 VDDN (37 SIP) Lieutenant Colonel Novikova, armed with S-75 "Desna" with a rocket 13D, fireding his Su-9 aircraft. The negative attitude of the state commission and to 37 SPRs, in which they could not fire U-2, due to the malfunction of the SNR, and 6 VDNs (s. Schelkun) did not fulfill the combat task due to the burnt fuse Stations.

Cases of the "friendly" shelling of aircraft with their zour a lot. Thus, the Division of Major A. Shugaeva instead of U-2 hit the MiG-19 fighter, which did not answer the request "his own strangers". In the Arab-Israeli War (October 1973), the Egyptians were shot down by 32 of their aircraft and 26 helicopters, and the Syrian air defense was 12 of their aircraft and 13 allied aircraft (Iraqis). Cases of destroying their aircraft with NATO troops in Yugoslavia and Iraq.

What is the ban on the truthful coverage of events around the defeat of the spy spy U-2? It is well known that N.S. Khrushchev was obsessed with rockets and he would not like that during the destruction of one spy aircraft, two of their fighter was fightered, one of which was shot down. Find out Khrushchev the truth, many commanders would receive serious recovery until the chief command of the air defense troops.

At the end of the report of Marshal S.S. Biryuzov Marshal R.Ya. Defense Minister Malinovsky says: "As I reported to you, the enemy was destroyed by rocket divisions of the 57th anti-aircraft missile brigade." Thus, on May 2, 1960, it was reported on the defeat of the spy of the spying aircraft divisions of Major Voronov and Captain Sheludko, as well as the shelling U-2 division of Lieutenant Colonel Novikov outside the far border of the defeat zone. Later on shooting 5 VDDN 37 SU-9 SU-9 did not speak to prevent the destruction of the country's air defense troops.

My article may cause a negative response from destruction supportersU.-2 Division of Lieutenant Colonel Novikova. Therefore, I am ready for further discussion subject to honesty in publications and technically competent answers to a number of fundamental issues. I am confident that, when complying with the two conditions, opponents will have to admit that U.-2 was shot down by the Major Voronov Division.

President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko said that Ukraine's accession to NATO will become real when Ukraine fully goes to the NATO standard and reaches high arms compatibility. At the same time, at the parade in Ukraine, they tried to demonstrate the "newest" Ukrainian developments in the field of weapons. What is the "NATO Standard" and what technique was held at a parade in Kiev, we learned from a military expert, director of the Museum of Museum of Air Force Yuri Knutov.

"What is the transition to" NATO Standard "? They have their own requirements. First of all, these are calibers and cartridges that differ from ours. Then - these are the requirements for the technique: use of fuel, oils for the same tanks, spare parts. There must be their radio frequencies, the equipment that is installed on the tanks, the aiming system. This, of course, is primarily American requirements for which European military companies who produce military equipment were built at one time, and then it was already "NATO standards."

By the way, we also produce a number of arms on NATO standards, which at one time offered the same Greece and other states, and we have bought this technique. For example, there are Kalashnikov machines, which are prepared precisely under the "NATO Patron".

But what Poroshenko said is a lie. The main criterion for which the country is accepted into NATO is the lack of territorial disputes and conflicts inside it. If we assume that Ukraine is accepted into NATO - it immediately enters into operation 5 of the contract, according to which the NATO block should protect this country. And given the position-exposed by Ukraine, it is supposed to be aggression from Russia - NATO countries would have to declare the war of Russia.

NATOVS, it seems, in general, still healthy mentally people, even though they come across leaders with deviations, especially in the United States. But Europeans understand that Russia is a nuclear power. If Russia is applicable at least tactical nuclear weapons in Europe, the Western Europe will cease to exist. Therefore, the Europeans will never go on such a stupid step.

Without resolving the conflict in the Donbas, without the recognition of Ukraine, the Crimea Russian, in accordance with the results of the referendum, Poroshenko may not dream of accession to the NATO block. He can about it, of course, speak from the stand, but it really does not happen.

Russia has its own solid and clear position, and she is not going to change it. Everything that Poroshenko says is promotional fakes, in order to get another tranche, now from the USA, to finance the Armed Forces.

This year, the United States has provided for this about $ 200 million, so that there is no freezing of financing - Poroshenko reports on spent money. You have allocated funds - here we spend them for the translation of technology under NATO standards.

As I said, in fact, on changes in caliber guns, ammunition, electronics. On the very number of differences from the weapons of the countries of the Warsaw Treaty. At one time, it was done in order for the Soviet army in the case of the war, the Soviet army could not use NATO projectiles when capturing technicians, and NATO - Soviet.

As for the Ukrainian military parade. There was a presented Self-propeller "Bogdan", it was created on the basis of KamAZ - with a barrel of 155 mm, according to NATO standard (we have 152 mm).

But the question - how did they make it? Because the production technology of "trunks" is unique.

If we recall how Ukrainians have done new mortars - so that mine people have broken constantly straight in the trunks and their people. Interestingly here - what quality processing of the trunks and the stems themselves.

But in general, the barrel from our SAU "Msta" is taken as the basis, especially since we also offered for sale "Musta" under NATO Calibr. Also, from our warmts is used by the treason part. And as a chassis - cities, but they are all right with them, they produced them and continue to release. Just light shields are put and made easy booking that protects against bullets and small fragments.

In general, in the world, this type of the game is produced - "Archer" ("archer") from the Swedes there is, and there is a similar French in the French, but the level of electronics there is colossal. In the Swedish Gaubice, the calculation - three people sits, and everything else happens automatically using a computer. The French is different - there is a charging, there is a calculation.

But regarding Ukraine - I doubt that she went on the path of complication that they broke their heads and came up with a new one. They took the old Soviet and hung on it or Swedish or French, in terms of electronics.

But I repeat - we do not know the quality of the trunks and their condition, this is the first. The second - the stems are the same ammunition needed a similar caliber, then the plants that will produce them are needed. I think that Ukrainians will not go along the way of building factories or their rearmament, they will simply buy ammunition from NATO member states.

Who? In the same Germany, or for the same US - there will absolutely log in. The loan is associated with the Americans themselves, because they gave them money - they will say to buy ammunition from them. It fits into the politics of Trump, and he is quite likely, and will not allow someone else the ammunition to buy.

Now, regarding tanks. They have a "new T-84" created on the basis of T-64. If you look at it - there are no new products there. There is a dynamic protection, and the quality of this protection we do not know. The fact that there existed on the basis of T-64 is simply upgraded, the tool is now NATO, "machine gun" is made under the NATO standard.

Several of their tanks participated in Europe in tank biathlon. Of the four of their tanks, they have three faulty. There were not even aiming system, the most they most likely tried to create themselves, but they did not come out.

I think they purchased half the technology from the French, who from the point of view of electronics tanks "Leclerk" are very advanced. And the second half decided to create themselves. The result we saw on tank biathlon, and at the rehearsal parade - this "new tank" smoked, Chadil and his fired on tractors.

Regarding aviation at the parade - it is primitive. They simply installed GPS American receivers, which allow to determine the coordinates and work "on NATO standards" at their frequencies. And on several aircraft installed an upgraded aiming system, in accordance with NATO standards.

A separate story with helicopters, when was shown Mi-2. This is the first Soviet helicopter. They were barely redesigned them, littered and called the "super masterpiece" of the Ukrainian MCC. But it is generally funny, against the background of what helicopters are being developed, and among Americans, the minimum speed of which is 400-500 km / h. Show Mi-2 and say that this is a technique that "causes an earthquake in the Kremlin" sincerely funny.

Regarding the flying An-178. They started this project with Russia, but could not complete. The plane was made by military transport, but very serious characteristics were laid in it. Requirements that we have presented to him were to meet today's and tomorrow. Ukraine could not bring it to this standard, and our country was forced to break the contract. Even if Ukraine is now finding investors, no one will buy it in Europe - they have their own much better samples.

"Migi", "Drying" from the parade is what, perhaps, replaced the GPS system. The main quality of a normal fighter is a weapon, a fire management system, rockets that stand on it - they should be modern. Conditionally, our plane, upgraded, sees the Ukrainian MiG at a distance of 500 km. And they see us at a distance of 100 km. That is, we saw it for 500 km, they released a rocket for 300 km, which he was shot down, and they did not even see the plane, which opened fire on him.

Plus - long ago there are controlled rockets, even if we are talking about fighters, managed bombs have long been used. This weapon Ukraine is hardly developing, due to the fact that it is too expensive and difficult, and the development, and production. Even if they have the potential of the Times of the USSR, then there is no money, and equipment to play this.

The "New Army" parade is created exclusively for internal consumption. Poroshenko wishes to show that "visa-free" he did, we go to NATO, we have the army to be implemented under NATO standards, so - vote for me.

It is worth noting that all the equipment on the parade does not look defensive. Rather, on the contrary. All weapons that demonstrated - offensive. The same "javelins" are offensive weapons, albeit under the guise of defensive. Against whom this weapon will be applied - we are understandable.

It is impossible to talk about the mass phenomenon of the "New Ukrainian Army". The fact that on the parade was shown - they have, and more, in the troops themselves, definitely nothing. "

After Maidan, the Pentagon was prepared and agreed with the Treaty of the US military fleet for a hundred years in the Crimea. This was announced in the interview with the "KP" Director of the Moscow Air Defense Museum, Military Historian Yuri Knutov.

"After an armed coup in Ukraine, organized by Washington, American ships equipped with IJIS anti-missile defense system should be based in Sevastopol, which would neutralize our strength of strategic appointment until, the Urals," says Knutov.

When asked where the data, the military historian replied that, although they were never published, "this is information from sources deserving trust."

On the eve of the next negotiations in Minsk, Yuri Knutov calls on the leadership of the Russian Federation not to weaken the position. "We agree to close the eyes on what is happening in the Donbas, block the border for the humanitarian and volunteers - will say: give up the Crimea. We will give the Crimea - let's notify that our nuclear weapons are worried about the West. Well, then - remember the words Madeleine Albright:" Too big Luxury that Russia owns Siberia. "All this struggle for the resources owned by our country," he explains.

According to the historian, the revision of the results of the Second World War and attempts to equate the USSR to Hitler's Germany is not accidental. "The Soviet Union was an aggressor, which means that he must pay multi-billion dollar reparations! It does not be able to pay, it means that Siberia must give, its minerals ... Everything, the circle closed. Everything is subordinate to one goal. Thinks by chance Prince Charles last winter, remembering Crimean Situation, compared Putin with Hitler? The direction is set, "explains the whips.

Now, perhaps, we are on the eve of the next hot phase of the three hundred years of Russia's conflict with the West, believes whips. "NATO aircraft based in the Baltic countries are able to carry nuclear missiles and nuclear bombs on board. They have a flowing time to St. Petersburg in four minutes. Russian strategic bombers, for comparison, to the territory of the United States to fly ten o'clock," he reminds .

In an interview with the historian leads a lot of other data, testifying to the very dangerous position in Russia and around Russia calls for an urgent refusal of the market economy and the transition to mobilization state regulation, talks about how Western chips that are used in Russian military equipment, remotely Turns off from Yugoslavs during the war of 1999, calls for the emergency reconstruction of the domestic microelectronics and says: "The situation is really similar to the one that was before the Second World War."

The most terrible exhibit of the air defense museum - Dirama: "Aerial Defense of Moscow". Snow, black sky, beams of spotlights, blood, aerostats. Broken shells. I suddenly catch myself thinking: Recently, the war was very far away, the same ideologically verified stories had impressed impressions, erased emotions. But how fresh to understand: all this can happen specifically in your life, personally with you. It has already happened not far, and this every day is shown in the news. As different ways, official exhibits and missing words of veterans are immediately perceived, which the plane continued to lead the plane, went to the ram ... and in a different way, attempts at some politicians to revise our history ...

Crimea was going to capture the Americans

- Yuri Albertovich, we have seen one and a half years ago and discussed the belligence: a computer game in which players performed in the Great Patriotic War on the side of the fascists. Accordingly, they could beat the Battle of Stalingrad ... You then said: not just so lately films are removed, in which Berlin in May 45 takes Americans, or equalize Smerness and SS, or blur, question the feat of Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya. All this has a clear goal: to declare Russia by the aggressor on a par with Hitler's Germany.

In 2013, your words sounded wildly, but you turned out to be a prophet. It turns out that we have not been freed by Auschwitz, we invaded Germany, and not Germany to us ... And after all, no one won political figures.

We must admit: the revision of the results of the Great Patriotic War, which historians warned for so long for so long, occurred. What will happen to us now? What is going on?

The situation is hard. Russia is declared outcast. And this happened not today. If you analyze the statements of Western politicians over the past few decades, it seems that the Hitler's Ostive General Plan is accepted against our country ... Do you know the content of this document?

- In outline...

According to this plan on the European territory of the former USSR and part of Eastern Europe, the Arkhangelsk-Nizhny Novgorod-Astrakhan (two "A" line) should remain as slaves of 15 million people. Thirty million was destroyed in death camps, another fifty was evicted to Western Siberia and South America.

On the site of Moscow should have been a reservoir, and Leningrad was erased from the face of the Earth, like a number of other cities of the USSR. The original document was found in the federal archive of Germany in the late 1980s, and fully published only in December 2008, so in the Nuremberg Tribunal, the Soviet Union could not prove anything ...

And now, with time, Margaret Tetcher utters a phrase: "According to the world community, it is economically advisable to live in Russia fifteen million people", or: "For the maintenance of a pipe, fifteen million people are enough." Similar words, Madeleine Albright and Zibignev Brzezinsky are attributed: everywhere appear fifteen million ... Do you understand?

Now the Russian liberal opposition preaches: if we were not quarreled with the West because of the Crimea, they would live in chocolate ...

Yes, we do not need the West. Brzezinsky wrote: "Russia is generally an excess country" ...

Now about Crimea: Yes, the new open stage of Russophobia, marked by the current statements of Gushege Snetany and Arseniya Yatsenyuk about the Great Patriotic War, began with the fact that Russia accepted the Crimea in his composition. But could we do otherwise?

- Could?

Not! After the Maidan and the Pentagon organized by Washington, the Pentagon was prepared and agreed with the Treaty on the US military fleet for a hundred years in the Crimea. In Sevastopol, American ships were based, equipped with IJIS anti-missile defense system, which would neutralize our strength of strategic appointment right up to the Urals ...

- Where does such data come from? In my opinion, they never published.

This is information from sources deserving confidence. To understand what is happening now in Russia, it is important to understand: a modern hybrid war has different forms. This information war, the financial war: the establishment of an enemy in the country of the economic and political crisis, leading to the state coup and the establishment of a regime, loyal to the aggressor ... the direct use of the armed forces is not necessary.

- Wait ... that is, war is already unleashed against Russia?

Yes! Everything is obvious: US collusion with Saudi Arabia on the fall in oil prices, at the same time the most powerful attack on the ruble, in which, as we know, and foreign financial funds participated, plus the information war, which includes the revision of the results of the Second World War. Plus, an economic blockade, which is enhanced regardless of the statements and actions of Russia in Donbass. Add another attempt to draw us into a new arms race, which is clearly not in my pocket now ... All together is a clear and sophisticated blow. The goal is to cause discontent within the country.

It is important to understand: we can not weaken their position. We agree to close the eyes on what is happening in the Donbass, shout the border for humanitarian and volunteers - will say: refuse the Crimea ... We will give the Crimea - let us say that our nuclear weapons are worried about the West ... well, and then - remember the words Madeleine Albright: "Too big luxury that Russia has one own Siberia." All this struggle for the resources owned by our country.

Three hundred years in campaign

- When did the war start? Together with Maidan?

Much earlier. When King Peter the first gave the "window to Europe" and the Empress Catherine The second came to the Black Sea. Since the formation of the Russian Empire. As soon as we became a great power, having entered into an alien zone of influence, attempts began to return us to its original state. We are all the time in the campaign. Only conflict comes in a hot phase, then "frozen". The hot phase fell twice: This is the World War II and the Second World War.

- That is, today is not hot ...

Now, perhaps the run-up of the hot phase. Created a group of troops from our borders. Airplanes based in the Baltic countries are able to carry nuclear missiles and nuclear bombs aboard nuclear rockets. They have a flowing time to St. Petersburg in four minutes. Russian strategic bombers, for comparison, to the territory of the United States to fly ten o'clock.

A characteristic example of the last months is scandals with Russian military aircraft, which intercepts NATO aviation. The reason for flights over the Baltic and Atlantic is simple: pilots need to train to fly on devices, otherwise, in conditions when the sky is blue and the sea blue, disorientation occurs, the pilot seems that he flies down his head, fifteen percent of the accidents over the sea occurs in such a situation. Where do we train? Either over the Pacific Ocean, either over Baltic: the Far East too far, the Black Sea is small, the northern Arctic Ocean is covered with ice. Well, of course, choose the Baltic ... That is, the flights were always. Always warned all international organizations, in a proper order. But now for some reason, workouts began to annoy ...

The current aggravation of relationships began two years ago, under President Obama. We showed an independent position on Syria (before that, in such disassembly - Libya, Yugoslavia - did not interfere. And here they said: Yes, this regime is unfair, but those who are torn to power, even worse ...

It did not like the United States who have long written off Russia with accounts as defeated in the Cold War. Plus Putin offered a single Europe from Lisbon to Vladivostok, and this was no longer liked Merkel ... It's no secret that Germany claims to be a state number one in Europe ... Well, the last one - we demanded not to help Iran. But we have serious economic interests there: we build a nuclear power plant! Why should we lose billions of dollars?!

I pay attention: Iranians do not want the power plant of the Soviet sample, invented forty years ago. We have developed a project at the level of world standards, no worse than in France!

By the way, the same story and with weapons: what we sell in the international market, for example, tank T90, it's every time, in fact, innovative jerk. Do I need to explain how important it is for us? Indeed, in the 90s, Russia inspired: there is a division of labor between countries, for example, Russian cars will never be better than German, there is no need to try to design them. Niche Russia - gas, coal, oil, forest ... And so, thanks to international contracts, a number of sectors of the Russian industry have reached the level of requirements of today and tomorrow. These are metallurgy, defense, space ...

- Cosmos?! Yes, because the "proton" fell at once at once! All the liberals are giggling ...

I tell. In 1999, Yugoslavia before the war he himself bought in NATO countries with radio electronics for the army: radio stations, radars. All electronics are made on the bissings - large integrated circuits - in which only the percentage of thirty workers, and the rest of the false, so that competitors cannot copy (which parts of the scheme of workers, know only the developer). Next begins war. A team passes from American satellites and aircraft of long-range radar detection Avacs - these allegedly false areas of the scheme are activated and all electronics fail ...

Now imagine that we are just now begin to make bisa in Zelenograd.

- And before?

And before, we also bought them in the West. And I think: perhaps, we bought what was already in flight it was possible to turn off ... This is how the international interbank information transfer system and the payment of SWIFT payments: we were forced to believe that we are part of the world economy forever, and you can not Invent and not produce ...

"My friend went to Donetsk with a humanitarian escort: he has turned on four times. Himself.

The surveillance is conducted. Anyone included phone transmits signals about your location, as well as any computer connected to the Internet, perhaps transfers to someone your files ... It is important to understand: the cold war has not stopped, never. Even when we had a completely friendly relationship with the West, up to joint exercises with NATO, the local military car worked without reducing turnover. We in the museum felt this skin ...

- I.e?

We have anti-aircraft missile systems, foreign tourists come. Do you know what interests them? Not a story, not open technical characteristics like the number of missiles ... placement on position. The complex is not one car. Ask, at what distance, anti-aircraft installations are located from the guidance station of missiles and radar stations, SNR and RLS (here the expert leaves for additional questions, from which it can be concluded that these data are secret and from Russian citizens. - Auto)...

Time remains a bit

- Let's still talk about the revision ...

The main postulates of revengery, or revising the results of the Second World War, are. First: the United States defeated the war. In the West, almost no one doubts this, it is scheduled at the film level. Obama announced that his grandfather took Berlin, whereas in reality Americans stopped on the Elbe.

The second postulate: Stalinism and fascism do not have differences. Arguments: The USSR attacked Poland, the Baltic States, Finland, he himself was going to attack Hitler, threw his soldiers in a bloody meat grinder and not the ability, and as a mountain of corpses crushed the opponent. All by the books of the traitor to Tuba-Suvorov and to him like. The liberation of Eastern Europe is, according to revengers, the occupation: that is, one occupation was changed by another ...

Conclusion: The Soviet Union was aggressor. So, he must pay multi-billion dollar reparations! It will not be able to pay, it means that Siberia must give, its minerals ... Everything, the circle closed. Everything is subordinate to one goal. Do you think the random Prince Charles last winter, remembering the Crimean situation, compared Putin with Hitler? The direction is set ...

- amazing ... In the 90s, we agreed that the establishment of Soviet power in the countries of Eastern Europe and the Baltic countries did not quite voluntarily happened, because they wanted to be indulgent to our neighbors, they understood their historical resentments, they wanted to leave the bad in past. But we did not think that for our condescension we will want to start the world ...

Yes, because they are accustomed to the thought that since we saved humanity from fascism, then everyone should be grateful to us! And in fact, not one Hitler attacked on us: we should rob in Europe! They got saczym, they hid offense, now it became possible to take revenge on defeat in World War II, to kick the Russian bear ...

By the way, another ten years ago one friend, Swiss, bought real estate in Kaliningrad. I asked: "Why?", "And he replied:" After a while we can return Kaliningrad to Germany, I do a profitable investment "... So plans for the dismemberment of our country are a reality.

- Why no one disproves the arguments of revenge?

Yes, about this volume written! Well, for example, "crushed the opponent of the mountain of meat" is not true. Everyone operates the digit that our losses in the war are twenty-six and a half million people. But! Only ten and a half million of them soldiers, the rest are civilians, exterminated in accordance with the OST general plan in the occupation or stolen to Germany.

The Military Losses of the Germans - six and a half million people, and if adding those killed from all Satellites of Hitler - Austria, Hungary, Romania, Finland and others - will be a parity on military losses.

- What about the project of the USSR attack on Germany?

Such a plan was really offered, but Stalin replied that "this is the material for the prosecutor."

After the flight of the Deputy Hitler by Rudolf Hess Party in England, the conclusion of the separation world between London and Berlin was very high, a Soviet agent in British intelligence Kim Filby reported. Therefore, Stalin knew that in the case of a preventive strike of the Red Army, Hitler will immediately make a military union against the USSR with the British.

The attachment of the Baltic States in general was most similar to the Crimean Spring, for last year's accession to the Crimea to Russia, with voting and nationwide euphoria ...

- When did you try to revise the results of the Great Patriotic War?

Immediately after May 9, 1945. But while the USSR was alive, he pressed such attempts to be his ideological power. But after the 91st year, when Russia turned into a third world country, which anyone can kick - even Georgia! - The priority was lost. Now we have to explain the sequence of historical events and the difference between the political structures of the USSR and Germany, even their own citizens: society is seriously affected by anti-Russian propaganda ...

And, it would seem, everything is so simple! Nazism is an ideology at which lower races should work on the highest: in fact, this is a slavement. And communism - happiness for all mankind! Of course, the idea was perverted in the form of a gulag, but remember that at that time India and all Africa were the colonies of Great Britain, France and other "civilized" European states. In fact, the colonies are the same gulag ...

- You speak terrible things, and I also know terrible: it turns out that in Japan they believe that this we dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ...

Yes, they have been taught at school. Since the collapse of the USSR.

- Looks like we will live to live when they announce it, we arranged the Holocaust ...

There are such voices. Fortunately, while the Jews are alive who remember, as in fact, they are our allies, Israel does not even join the sanctions against Russia in Ukraine. Because the Jews see all these swastiki, they understand what is happening ... But ideas will be borrowing. In Ukraine, for example.

- What do we do? How to confront all this?

We will be able to reverse the attitude towards us only in the root rebuilding the economy, that is, if you are able to climb. It is no longer possible to prove the truth now: eyewitnesses, veterans aged and tired of fighting.

For example, all the participants in the Great Patriotic War, with whom I had to communicate, they say that Zagratryads never shot the machine guns in their own, they just caught deserters who fled with the advanced. The myth appeared in the 90s within the opening of the entire Soviet. But old people do not hear, and they waved their hand ...

It will be difficult for us: the same experts operate in the United States who successfully conducted the collapse of the USSR. The price of oil is fifty dollars per barrel is not the limit: During the collapse of the Soviet Union, oil was sold below the cost ... a separate and difficult conversation - the binding of our economy to the dollar, the absolute monopoly of the liberal school with its primacy of the market.

Why should the market be dogma? In the crisis situation, the role of the state should increase - in 2008, the US government even nationalized a number of companies, that is, went to an absolutely not market measure! In the European Union, the economy is simply planned. There are basic prices, quotas for production volumes ...

We now need an economy similar to mobilization, which allows you to concentrate resources at breakthrough directions, as during the Second World War. Thanks to her, the USSR defeated fascism.

But there are no progress in this side. There is a serious impoverishment of the people caused by the devaluation of the ruble. While the mood in people is cheerful: Let we become the poorest, if only ourselves, without external control, - but let's see if he will continue for the summer ...

- What is the snag?

Apparently, snag in the elite. Zbigniew Brzezinsky once said: "Elite, who keeps his money in American dollars in American banks, is not a Russian, but an American" ...

And the time, meanwhile, not so much left. The United States aims non-nuclear high-precision missiles to the location of our nuclear weapons, and Russian rockets that destroy and will be able to take off, intercepts the American system of pro. These are their military strategy. Weapons put laser weapons. Successful tests of the American orbital plane of reusable use Boeing X-37. It is able to fly in space, quickly change orbit, maneuvering and carry nuclear weapons: no one knows at what point he will emerge over Moscow ... By the way, the basis of the project to the Americans was presented in the 1990s, as part of the improvement of relations with the United States. The Soviet analogue of this ship was called "Spiral", his author is the designer "Burana" Gleb Lozino-Lozinsky. The Soviet aircraft stands as an exhibit at the Museum of the Air Force in Monino, and American flies ...

Regarding us no longer have the norms of international merchant law: I am about the situation with the Mistrals, which we are not given, although the ships are our property, and the feed and nose were just made from us.

The other day, US President Obama said that the war with Russia is undesirable. That is, he allows war with our country ...

The situation is really similar to the one that was before the Second World ...

Question Edge

Who shot down Boeing over Donetsk?

Chatting, we are clouded in the museum of air defense troops. We come to one of the exhibits.

Here is the most air-air rocket, which, by one of the versions, was shot down by the Malaysian Boeing ... Personally, I think that I knocked down "beech", and Su-25 finished in a fall, why: the ceiling su -25 - seven thousand meters, and "Boeing" went on nine-ten thousand. But the tracks of the aviation gun on the fragments of the plane is undoubtedly ...

My version: I was preparing to bring down the plane of the President of Russia, made a mistake, because the tracks of Mala Zia "Boeing" and the presidential IL-96 crossed. In 1983, the WFA of the USSR also shot down the South Korean aircraft, confused with a spy plane, and the USA in 1988 shot down the Iranian passenger airbus with 290 passengers, sixty-six of which were children ... Americans, by the way, did not apologize for this catastrophe.

I believe that there was a plan: to bring down Putin's aircraft over the territory of the DNR, so that he fell into the territory of Russia, but made a mistake, there was not enough about two tens of kilometers ... To do this, they brought off the Ukrainian base "Buki", put along the route. .. Then the photos of these "beecles" published on the Internet as proof of Russia's intervention. And there is perfectly visible a radar station ST-68, which has always been produced only in Zaporizhia, and which has long been removed from the arms of the Russian army, but still used in Ukraine ...

P.S. Exceptionally interesting interview

US President Trump on the elimination of medium and less rockets. At the same time the United States. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, and the Secretary of the Security Council of Russia Nikolai Patrushev during a meeting with the US President's Assistant on the National Security Bolton noted. Military expert, director of the Museum of Museum of Air Defense, Yuri Knutov, believes that US policies, stating intentions to leave DRSMD, are trying to solve several of their tasks.

"Trump declared his intention to leave DRSMD before elections to Congress. That is, the goal of the Republicans is to raise their rating, so on the one hand it is a domestic political statement. On the other hand, there are military-political goals. The United States rated threats in case Russia will apply new types of weapons that Vladimir Putin said during his speech to the Federal Assembly - this is the missiles "Sarmat", "Avangard" and others. This is a set of funds that may apply the United States irreparable damage. Therefore, Washington decided so: if the war is, it should not occur in the United States, but, for example, in Europe. The United States will observe and help to European states from behind the ocean, and thus protect themselves.

Of course, the decision to get out of the contract puts the world on the verge of war, and above all, it will affect Europe. Why is the United Kingdom in intentions to leave DRSMD, and Germany responded? Because europe falls under. But in fact, the United States has long begun slowly to leave the Treaty on Middle and Less Rights. Washington posted two bases in Poland and Romania, on which there are ground options for the IJIS anti-missile defense complex. Although according to the RSMD Agreement, the winged rockets of the average and smaller land base range is prohibited. At one time we destroyed 1846 rockets, and the USA - 846, despite the fact that we still destroyed the "Oka" complex, which did not fall under the contract. Americans have such goals today: either impose a version of 1987, when we destroy our missiles twice as much as the United States, and they receive a one-sided advantage, or to break the contract and put pressure on Russia from the position of force.

Of course, situations in 1987 and at the present time incomparable. Today we have air defense systems: C-300, C-400 and C-500. Moreover, the C-300, despite the fact that it is already a "stage passed" in such armament, it is capable of fighting with crucible rockets, and with medium-range missiles. And about the C-400 and C-500 and there is nothing to say. We have laser weapons "Peresvet", there are means of radio electronic struggle, and micropulse weapons are also being developed.

But the problem is in the other. If the winned rocket is a bit of 20 minutes, then the ballistic missile of the medium range is five minutes. Over these five minutes we must have time to react. Now these missiles are too much "stuck", where is the guarantee that it does not happen in an unintentional start? If this rocket does not have time to knock down, and its fall will lead to tremendous victims, will follow a return strike without finding out the "relationship". The duration of the strategic rocket flight is 30 minutes. During this time, you can have time to figure out what it is from where, ask the same Americans to submit a self-dequity signal on the rocket - the same moment "works" with us. But what can be done in five minutes? Nothing. This is the whole horror of the situation that the United States is now created. And they do it, as I said, purposefully.

How can we resist this? For example, we have a Sarmat rocket: it is now in development and on trials, and in the near future will be adopted. This rocket is so unique that it is capable of overcome any American pro, even through the South Pole. Americans along South America not only anti-missile, but there are no contradiction. That is, Sarmat can impact any goal in the United States.

Suppose we created 20 missiles "Sarmat", and the Americans spent enormous means for deploying medium-range ballistic missiles. But if the Americans know that we have 20 "Sarmatians", which can be applied in the United States an unacceptable blow, they will never be solved to apply their missiles in Europe. We must follow this way: without increasing the Russian military budget, create such armaments that Americans will not be able to restrain. It is in this case that the United States will not go to the escalation of action. Moreover, after some time they will be forced to negotiate with Russia. But the problem is that Trump holds "Policy of Power": he is against equal treaties, it is only interested in those options that are beneficial to the United States.

I also indignant that the United States associates the decision to exit DRSMD with the position of China. How does China concern Russian-American relations? This is the same if Russia will require the destruction of Israel's ballistic missiles for the sake of negotiations with the United States. Americans, in my opinion, specially occupied such a position and advanced in advance to unacceptable conditions to make Russia to blame for the contract break. At the same time, the Americans thought about revising the contract to reduce and restrict strategic offensive arms (START-3) - it is even more "terrible" thing. If the United States comes out of it, then the threat of world nuclear war will increase many times. "