Alexander Prozorov takes a different look at history. A different look at the history of Russia
aspinner 7 Sept, 2010 at 11:16 PMAnother look at the history of Russia
The war against Russia has been going on for a very long time and very, very successfully. Of course, not on the battlefields, where we have always hit everyone and very painfully, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars.
The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are stupid brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere in the 6-7th category, without a past and future. And he has practically proved that even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach completely and completely. Examples? You are welcome!
Example 1. We recently celebrated the 1000th anniversary of the baptism of Rus. And when did it actually appear?
The first capital (only the capital of a large country!), The city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 from the creation of the world); the source of information is the chronicle of the Servant Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovy" by S. Gerberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse", which has a wide circulation and was recorded by many ethnographers.
Since it is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovensk, I pestered the leading archaeologists, as far as it is plausible. Literally they answered me like this: “But God knows him. We have already dug up to the Paleolithic sites there. "
Example 2. It is generally accepted that somewhere in the 8th century, wild, brainless and worthless Slavs, wandering herds through the forests, summoned the Viking Rurik to themselves and said: “Take over us, about the great European superman, otherwise we idiots we ourselves can’t do anything ”. (Free presentation of a history textbook).
In fact, Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of lesser rank. He was called together with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or died in wars. He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim Chronicle, russian history according to Tatishchev, Brockhaus and Efron, etc.
Example 3. The opinion is widely spread that the Roman Empire, a model of legality and morality, was almost the only civilization of the past. In general, what gladiator fights Rome, that modern indulgence of marauders in Iraq is one field of berries.
The morale of the Western world has not changed much, and it still causes disgust among “savages” like the Russians, Chinese and Dagestanis. Official history: the great, beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of stinking shaggy savages. In fact, those who were sick of everyone (like the Americans now) were rehabilitated by more decent neighbors.
The bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry (open the textbook on the history of the ancient world, and admire the legionnaires) was trampled down in steel from tops to horse hooves cataphracts. The main source of information is "Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art" A. M. Khazanov. (I don’t remember the rest, but those who wish can search the autosearch themselves. There is a lot of material - they just don’t let it into schools. "Harmful").
The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to "cleanse" Rome? Ob, Ugra, Volga region, Ural region, Azov region ... Graves with partial armament of cataphracts were found in Dagestan. Have you, comrades patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome? Why was “wild Russia” in Europe called Gardarik - the Country of Cities? Now it doesn't matter, because we celebrate 1000 years of Russia with joyful faces, we consider Rurik to be the master who came from Norway, who founded Russia, and even, it seems, are proud of such a story.
The second goal was against the Russian fools. In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes nailed a shield to the gates of Constantinople, and it is difficult to assert that Russia did not exist even then. Therefore, in the coming centuries, long-term slavery was planned for Russia. The invasion of the Mongol-Tatars and 3 centuries of obedience and humility. What marks this era in reality? We will not deny our Mongol yoke, but:
As soon as it became known in Russia about the existence of the Golden Horde, young guys immediately went there to ... rob the Mongols who came from rich China to Russia. The Russian raids of the 14th century are best described (if anyone has forgotten, the period from the 14th to the 15th century is considered a yoke).
In 1360, Novgorod lads fought along the Volga to the Kamsky mouth, and then took by storm the large Tatar city of Zhukotin (Dzhuketau near the modern city of Chistopol). Having seized untold riches, the ushkuiniks returned back and began to "drink zipuns" in the city of Kostroma.
From 1360 to 1375, the Russians made eight major campaigns on the middle Volga, not counting small raids. In 1374, the Novgorodians took the town of Bolgar (not far from Kazan) for the third time, then they went down and took Sarai itself - the capital of the Great Khan.
In 1375, the Smolensk guys in seventy boats under the command of governors Prokop and Smolyanin moved down the Volga. By tradition, they made a "visit" to the cities of Bolgar and Saray. Moreover, the rulers of the Bolgar, taught by bitter experience, paid off with a large tribute, but the khan's capital Sarai was taken by storm and plundered.
In 1392, the ushkuyniks again took Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409, voivode Anfal led 250 ushkues to the Volga and Kama. And in general, to beat the Tatars, in Russia, was considered not a feat, but a trade.
During the Tatar "yoke" Russians went to the Tatars every 2-3 years, the Sarai was fired dozens of times, the Tata-rock was sold to Europe in hundreds. What did the Tatars do in response? We wrote complaints! To Moscow, to Novgorod. The complaints persisted. The “enslavers” could not do anything else. The source of information on the mentioned campaigns - you will laugh, but this is a monograph by the Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov.
They still cannot forgive us for these visits! And at school they still talk about how Russian gray-legged men cried and gave their girls into slavery - because they were submissive cattle.
And you, their descendants, also penetrate this thought. Do we have any doubts about the reality of the yoke?
In the 16th century, Ivan the Terrible came to power. During his reign in Russia:
- jury trial introduced
- free primary education (church schools)
- medical quarantine at borders
- local elected self-government, instead of the governor
- for the first time a regular army appeared (and the world's first military uniform - at the archers)
- stopped Tatar raids
- equality was established between all strata of the population (do you know that serfdom did not exist at all in Russia at that time? The peasant was obliged to sit on the land until he paid for its rent, and nothing more. And his children were considered free from birth, in any case!).
- slave labor is prohibited (source - Ivan the Terrible's code of law);
- the state monopoly on the fur trade, introduced by Grozny, was canceled only 10 (ten!) Years ago.
- the territory of the country has been increased 30 times!
- the emigration of the population from Europe exceeded 30,000 families (those who settled along the Zasechnaya line were paid a lifting 5 rubles per family. Expense books were preserved).
- the growth of the well-being of the population (and the taxes paid) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) Percent.
- for the entire period of the reign there was not a single person executed without trial and investigation, the total number of the "repressed" ranged from three to four thousand. (And the times were dashing - remember St. Bartholomew's night).
Now, remember what you were told about Grozny at school? That he was a bloody tyrant and lost the Livonian War, while Russia was shaking in horror?
Already in the 16th century, many brochures were published in Europe for every mindless man in the street. There it was written that the Russian tsar was a drunkard and a lecher, and all his subjects were the same savages. And in the instructions to the ambassadors it was indicated that the tsar is a teetotaler, unpleasantly clever, he categorically cannot stand drunken people, and even forbade drinking alcohol in Moscow, as a result of which one can only get drunk outside the city, in the so-called "liqueurs" ... Source - study "Ivan the Terrible" by Kazimir Walishevsky, France. Now guess three times - which of the two versions is set out in the textbooks? In general, our textbooks proceed from the principle that everything that is said about the Russia of the abominable is true. Anything that is said good or intelligible is a lie.
One example. In 1569 Grozny came to Novgorod, which had approximately 40,000 inhabitants. There was an epidemic raging there, and it also smelled of riot. According to the results of the sovereign's stay, completely preserved in the synodiks, memorial lists mark 2800 dead.
But Jerome Horsey in "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen massacred 700,000 (seven hundred thousand (?)) People in Novgorod.
Guess which of the two numbers is considered historically accurate?
Wild Russians cry and moan. And they are constantly hijacked and driven into slavery by dashing Crimean basurmans. And the Russians cry and pay tribute.
Almost all historians point a finger at the stupidity, weakness and cowardice of the Russian rulers, who could not cope even with the spattered Crimea. And for some reason they "forget" that there is no Crimean Khanate did not exist - there was one of the provinces Ottoman Empire, in which the Turkish garrisons stood and the Ottoman governor sat.
Who has no desire to reproach Castro for not being able to capture a tiny American base on his island?
The Ottoman Empire, by this time, was actively expanding in all directions, conquering all Mediterranean lands, stretching from Iran (Persia) and advancing on Europe, approaching Venice and laying siege to Vienna.
In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer at the same time the wild, as European brochures assured, Muscovy. 120 thousand troops moved from the Crimea to the north, supported by 20 thousand janissaries and 200 cannons. Near the village of Molodi, the Ottomans encountered a 50-thousand-strong detachment of voivode Mikhail Vorotynsky. And the Turkish army was ... No, it was not stopped - it was completely cut out !!! From that moment on, the Ottomans' offensive on their neighbors stopped - but try to engage in conquests if you almost cut your army by half! God forbid you to fight off the neighbors yourself. What do you know about this battle? Nothing? That's it! Wait, in 20 years about the participation of Russians in the Second World War will also begin to be "forgotten" in textbooks.
After all, all "progressive humanity" has long and firmly known - Hitler was defeated by the Americans. And it is time to correct the Russian textbooks "wrong" in this area. Information about the Battle of Molodi can generally be classified as closed. God forbid, the Russian cattle will learn that they can be proud of the deeds of their ancestors in the Middle Ages! He will develop a wrong self-awareness, love for the Fatherland, for her deeds. And this is wrong.
So, it is difficult to find data about the Battle of Molodi, but it is possible - in specialized reference books. For example, in the "Encyclopedia of Armaments" of the KiM three lines are written.http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D0%B8%...%B4%D1%8F%D1%85
Stupid Russian bums. Remembering the Mongol invasion, I am always surprised - where did they manage to collect so many sabers?
Indeed, sabers were forged only starting from the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, in Kubachi. Such is the strange fork - forever we and the Dagestanis suddenly turn out to be the same. Although, in all the textbooks, between us, there are always a couple of hostile states. Nowhere else in the world has they learned to forge - it is a much more complex art than it might seem. But progress was coming, the 17th century. The saber gave way to other weapons. Before the birth of Peter 1, there was very little left. What was Russia like?
If you believe the textbooks, approximately the same as in Tolstoy's novel "Peter the First" - patriarchal, ignorant, wild, drunk, inert ...
Did you know that it was Russia who armed all of Europe with advanced weapons? Every year Russian monasteries and foundries sold hundreds of cannons, thousands of muskets, and edged weapons there. Source - here's a quote from the "Encyclopedia of Arms":
“It is interesting that the manufacturers of artillery pieces in the 16th-17th centuries were not only the sovereign's cannons, but also monasteries. For example, a fairly large production of cannons was carried out in the Solovetsky Monastery and in the Kirillovo-Belozersky Monastery.
Owned guns and very successfully used the Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks. The first mention of the use of guns by the Zaporozhye Cossacks dates back to 1516.
IN XIX-XX centuries in Russia and abroad the opinion was formed that the pre-Petrine artillery was technically backward. But here are the facts: in 1646 the Tula-Kamensk factories supplied the Netherlands with more than 600 guns, and in 1647 360 guns of 4,6 and 8 pounds.
In 1675, the Tula-Kamensk factories shipped abroad 116 cast-iron cannons, 43892 balls, 2934 grenades, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron. "
So much for the wild, backward Russia, which they talk about at school.
By the way, from time to time, I come across russophobes who argue that all of the above cannot be, since even highly progressive and developed England and France learned to cast iron only in the 19th century. Yes, but let's go to the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. One of the cast-iron cannons, cast in 1600, lies there cheekily on a stand for all to see. People do not believe that Russia, throughout its history and in all respects, has overtaken Europe by about two centuries. But ...
Loser's conclusions. Starting with school years, we are told that our whole history is like a huge cesspool, in which there is not a single bright spot, not a single decent ruler.
There were either no military victories at all, or they led to something bad (the victory over the Ottomans is hidden like codes of nuclear launch, and the victory over Napoleon is duplicated by the slogan Alexander - the gendarme of Europe).
Everything that was invented by ancestors is either brought to us from Europe, or just a baseless myth.
The Russian people did not make any discoveries, they did not release anyone, and if someone turned to us for help, it was turning into slavery. And the lot of all Russians is to repent, repent and repent.
A little more than a hundred years of information warfare - and a sense of our own incompleteness has already been sown in us all. We are more, like our ancestors, not sure of our own righteousness. Look what is happening with our politicians: they are constantly making excuses.
Nobody demands to bring Lord Jad to trial for propaganda of terrorism and cooperation with bandits - he is persuaded that he is not quite right.
We threaten Georgia - and we do not carry out the threats. Denmark spits in our face - and they don't even impose sanctions against it. The Baltic countries have established an apartheid regime - politicians shyly turn away.
People demand permission to sell weapons for self-defense - they are openly called worthless cretins who, out of stupidity, will immediately interrupt each other.
Why should Russia make excuses? After all, she is always right! Nobody else dares to say this. You think - the current politicians are just so indecisive, but instead of them, just about, others will come. But this will never happen. Because the feeling of inferiority is not laid down in the post of foreign minister. They begin to be systematically raised from childhood, when the child is told: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, incapable of making the most elementary decisions.
But a kind and clever uncle Rurik came to them from Europe, began to OWN them and teach them. He created the state of Russia for them, in which we live.
The poison, drop by drop, pours into the soul, and when a person leaves school, he gets used to looking at the West as a kind master, more intelligent and developed. And at the words "democracy" begins to reflexively stand on its hind legs.
What the Western world does best is waging an information war. The blow was struck in the place that no one had thought to defend - according to the educational program. And the West won. It remains to show a little patience - and our children themselves will crawl on their knees in that direction and ask the lowest permission to lick the owners' shoes. Already crawling - a couple of days ago I managed to see a piece of the program "Why does Russia need its own currency?" Correctly. Then there will be: "Why do we need an army?" Then: "Why is statehood needed?"
The West has won. The consignment.
What to do? If you do not want children to be made slaves, you should not shout that we will fight when the hour comes, but save them right now.
The hour has come, the war is almost over for the overwhelming advantage of the enemy. There is an urgent need to break the course of teaching history, changing the emphasis of teaching to a positive one. My girls are still 4 and 5 years old, but when they go to school, I foresee hard days.
Lawsuits for poor quality teaching are guaranteed. If the historian does not teach children about who such an important person in history as Rurik was or does not know about the Molodin battle, then he must pay fines out of his own pocket. Better yet, file a lawsuit against the Ministry of Education for the dissemination of knowingly false information. Hire a good lawyer and it hurts and hurts to kick them - let them itch. But I don’t have one money for the “good” one. Poorly to throw off in the name of saving the honest name of the ancestors?
The second way to at least slightly strengthen the position on the fronts of the information war is to demand from the procurators the initiation of a criminal case on the fact of inciting ethnic hatred, by teaching false historical information.
There are a lot of examples. Recall tatar yoke... We are told that the Tatars oppressed the Russians, but they do not say that the Russians robbed the Tatars no less famously. As a result, Russians have a racial resentment towards fellow citizens. Moreover, the insult is wrong. We are all good and behaved exactly the same. Or, for example, last year Kazan celebrated (or tried to celebrate) the day of remembrance of the Tatars who defended the city from Russian troops.
There is a clear ethnic confrontation. Although, in fact, the city was taken not by Russians, but by Russian-Tatar (!) Troops. Shig-Alei's cavalry provided cover for the streltsy detachments - and if he is a German, then I am ready to recognize myself as Pope.
The Russian-Tatar troops took Kazan, eliminating the influence of Istanbul on the Volga, and protecting civilians from predatory raids, liberated tens of thousands of slaves. It is enough to recognize the participation of the Tatars in this noble cause - and the national question loses its acuteness.
But I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t know how to roll out a statement in such a way that it’s not brushed aside and sent to hell.
By the way, Dallas's plan to incite ethnic hatred was mentioned here more than once. And no one paid attention to how it is being implemented. Also at school.
Good teachers diligently sow discord between the largest ethnic groups - Russians and Tatars. The entire course of history permeates with how the Tatars attacked, how the Russians attacked the Tatars, etc. But, nowhere is it indicated that the Tatars are our symbiote, our companion people.
The Tatar units were ALWAYS part of the Russian troops, participated in all Russian wars - both internecine and in battles with an external enemy. We can say that the Tatars are just Russian light cavalry. Or Russians - Tatar forged men.
The Tatars fought against Mamai on the Kulikovo field together with the Moscow army, the Tatars were the first to attack the enemy in the Swedish and Livonian wars; in 1410, near Grunwald, the combined Polish-Russian-Tatar army utterly defeated the crusaders, breaking the back Teutonic Order - moreover, it was the Tatars who took the first blow.
Sometimes I am asked why I do not mention the Lithuanians. So I mention - Russians. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a Russian state, with a Russian population that spoke Russian, and even office work was conducted in Russian.
Did you think that a small racist country on the Baltic coast was once a great state?
We lived side by side with the Tatars for four thousand years. We fought, made friends, became related. They crushed the Romans, Crusaders, Ottomans, Poles, French, Germans ...
And now, our children open the textbook, and it drips from every page: enemies, enemies, enemies ... Legally this is called inciting ethnic hatred. But in reality it is an ordinary information war.
The war continues ...
The war against Russia has been going on for a very long time and very, very successfully. Of course, not on the battlefields, where we always beat everyone and it was very painful, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars .
The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are stupid brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere in the 6-7 grade, without the past and the future.
Examples? You are welcome!
Example 1 ... We have recently celebrated the 1000th anniversary of the baptism of Rus. And when did it actually appear?
The first capital (only the capital of a large country!), The city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 after the creation of the world); source of information - the chronicle of the Servant Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovy" by S. Herberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse", which has a widespread circulation and was recorded by many ethnographers.
Since it is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovensk, I pestered the leading archaeologists, as far as it is plausible. Literally, they answered me like this: “Who the hell knows. We have already dug up to the Paleolithic sites there ”.
Example 2 ... It is believed that somewhere in the 8th century, wild mindless and worthless Slavs, wandering herds through the forests, summoned the Viking Rurik and said: “Take over us, oh great European superman, otherwise we, idiots, ourselves we can’t do anything. ” (Free presentation of a history textbook).
In fact, Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of lesser rank. He was called together with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or perished in the wars.
He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim's Chronicle, Russian history according to Tatishchev, "Brockhaus and Efron", etc.
Example 3 ... The opinion is widely spread that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, an example of legality and morality. In general, that the gladiatorial battles of Rome, that the modern indulgence of marauders in Iraq - one field of berries.
The morale of the Western world has not changed much, and it still causes disgust among “savages” like the Russians, Chinese and Dagestanis.
Official history: the great, beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of stinking shaggy savages.
In fact, the geeks, sick of everyone (like the Americans now), were sanitized by more decent neighbors.
The bare-assed and bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry (open a textbook on the history of the ancient world, and admire the legionnaires) was worn down by cataphraktarii, chained in steel from the tops of the heads to the horses.
The main source of information is "Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art" A. M. Khazanov. (I don’t remember the rest, but those who wish can search the autosearch for themselves. There is a lot of material - they just don’t let it into schools. “Harmful”).
The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to "cleanse" Rome? Ob, Ugra, the Volga region, the Urals, the Azov region ... The tombs with partial armament of cataphracts were found in Dagestan.
Have you, comrades patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome? Why was “wild Russia” in Europe called Gardarik - the Country of Cities?
Now it doesn't matter, because we are celebrating 1000 years of Russia with joyful mugs, we consider Rurik to be the master who came from Norway, who founded Russia, and even, it seems, are proud of such a story.
4 millennia were sent down the drain, impudently fucked up, as uninteresting - and not a single dog even whined.
1: 0 in favor of the West ...
Another look at the history of Russia
Alexander Prozorov
The war against Russia has been going on for a very long time and very, very successfully. Of course, not on the battlefields, where we have always beaten everyone and very painfully, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars. The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are stupid brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere in the 6-7th category, without a past and future. And he has practically proved that even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach completely and completely.
Examples? You are welcome!
Example 1... We recently celebrated the 1000th anniversary of Russia. And when did it actually appear? The first capital (only the capital of a large country!), The city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 after the creation of the world); the source of information is the chronicle of the Servant Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovy" by S. Gerberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse", which has a wide circulation and was recorded by many ethnographers. Since it is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovensk, I pestered the leading archaeologists, as far as it is plausible. Literally, they answered me like this: “Who the hell knows. We have already dug up to the Paleolithic sites there ”.
Example 2... It is generally accepted that somewhere in the 8th century, wild, brainless and worthless Slavs, wandering herds through the forests, called the Viking Rurik to themselves and said: “Take over us, oh great European superman, otherwise we, idiots, are nothing can not". (Free presentation of a history textbook). In fact, Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of lesser rank. He was called together with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or perished in the wars. He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim Chronicle, Russian history according to Tatishchev, "Brockhaus and Efron", etc.
Example 3... The opinion is widely spread that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, an example of legality and morality. In general, that the gladiatorial battles of Rome, that the modern indulgence of marauders in Iraq - one field of berries. The morale of the Western world has not changed much, and it still causes disgust among “savages” like the Russians, Chinese and Dagestanis.
Official history: the great, beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of stinking shaggy savages. In fact, the geeks, who were sick of everyone (like the Americans now), were sanitized by more decent neighbors. Bare-footed and bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry (open a textbook on the history of the ancient world and admire the legionnaires) was worn down with steel shackled from tops to horse hooves cataphracts... The main source of information is “Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art” by A.M. Khazanov. (I don’t remember the rest, but those who wish can search the autosearch for themselves. There is a lot of material - they just don’t let it into schools. "Harmful").
The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to "cleanse" Rome? Ob, Ugra, Volga region, Ural region, Azov region ... Graves with partial armament of cataphracts were found in Dagestan. Have you, comrades patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome? Why was “wild Russia” in Europe called Gardarik - the Country of Cities? Now it doesn't matter, because we are celebrating 1000 years of Russia with joyful faces, we consider Rurik to be the master who came from Norway, who founded Russia, and even, it seems, are proud of this story.
4 millennia were sent down the drain, impudently fucked up, as uninteresting - and not a single dog even whined.
1: 0 in favor of the West.
The second goal against the Russian fools... In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes nailed a shield to the gates of Constantinople, and it is difficult to assert that Russia did not exist even then. Therefore, in the coming centuries, long-term slavery was planned for Russia. and 3 centuries of obedience and humility. What marks this era in reality? We will not deny the Mongol yoke, but ... As soon as the existence of the Golden Horde became known in Russia, young guys immediately went there to ... rob the Mongols who came from rich China to Russia. The Russian raids of the 14th century are best described (if anyone has forgotten, the period from the 14th to the 15th century is considered a yoke).
In 1360, Novgorod lads fought along the Volga to the Kamsky mouth, and then took by storm the large Tatar city of Zhukotin (Dzhuketau near the modern city of Chistopol). Having seized untold riches, the ushkuiniks returned back and began to "drink zipuns" in the city of Kostroma. From 1360 to 1375, the Russians made eight major campaigns on the middle Volga, not counting small raids. In 1374, the Novgorodians took the town of Bolgar (not far from Kazan) for the third time, then went down and took Sarai itself, the capital of the Great Khan.
In 1375, the Smolensk guys in seventy boats under the command of governors Prokop and Smolyanin moved down the Volga. By tradition, they made a "visit" to the cities of Bolgar and Saray. Moreover, the rulers of the Bolgar, taught by bitter experience, paid off with a large tribute, but the khan's capital Sarai was taken by storm and plundered. In 1392, the ushkuyniks again took Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409, voivode Anfal led 250 ushkues to the Volga and Kama. And in general, to beat the Tatars, in Russia, was considered not a feat, but a trade.
During the Tatar "yoke" Russians went to the Tatars every 2-3 years, Sarai was fired dozens of times, and hundreds of Tatar women were sold to Europe. What did the Tatars do in response? We wrote complaints! To Moscow, to Novgorod. The complaints persisted. The "enslavers" could not do anything else. A source of information on the mentioned campaigns - you will laugh, but this is a monograph by a Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov.
They still cannot forgive us for these visits! And at school they still talk about how Russian gray-legged men cried and gave their girls into slavery - because they were submissive cattle. And you, their descendants, also penetrate this thought. Do we have any doubts about the reality of the yoke?
2: 0 in favor of the West.
In the 16th century, Ivan the Terrible came to power... During his reign in Russia:
- introduced a jury trial;
- free primary education (church schools);
- medical quarantine at the borders;
- local elected self-government, instead of the governor;
- for the first time there was a regular army (and the world's first military uniform - at the archers);
- stopped Tatar raids;
- equality was established between all strata of the population (do you know that serfdom did not exist in Russia at all at that time? The peasant was obliged to sit on the land until he paid for its rent, and nothing more. And his children were considered free from birth, in any case!).
- slave labor is prohibited (source - Ivan the Terrible's code of law);
- the state monopoly on the fur trade, introduced by Grozny, was canceled only 10 ( ten!) years ago.
- the territory of the country has been increased 30 times!
- the emigration of the population from Europe exceeded 30,000 families (those who settled along the Zasechnaya line were paid a lifting 5 rubles per family. Expense books were preserved).
- the growth of the well-being of the population (and the taxes paid) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) Percent.
- for the entire time of the reign there was no one executed without trial or investigation, the total number of "repressed" ranged from three to four thousand. (And the times were dashing - remember St. Bartholomew's night).
Now, remember what you were told about Grozny at school? That he was a bloody tyrant and lost the Livonian War, while Russia was shaking in horror?
3: 0 in favor of the West.
By the way, about the Americans stupid as a result of propaganda... Already in the 16th century, many brochures were published in Europe for every mindless man in the street. There it was written that the Russian tsar was a drunkard and a debaucher, and all his subjects were the same wild freaks. And in instructions to ambassadors it was indicated that the king is a teetotaler, unpleasantly smart, categorically does not tolerate drunken people, and even forbade drinking alcohol in Moscow, as a result of which you can only get drunk outside the city, in the so-called "liqueurs" (the place where they pour). Source - study "Ivan the Terrible" by Kazimir Walishevsky, France. Now guess three times - which of the two versions is set out in the textbooks?
In general, our textbooks proceed from the principle that everything that is said about the Russia of the abominable is true. Anything that is said good or intelligible is a lie.
One example. In 1569 Grozny came to Novgorod, which had, approximately, 40 000 population. There was an epidemic raging, and it smelled of riot. According to the results of the sovereign's stay, the memorial lists fully preserved in the synodiks are noted 2800 dead... But Jerome Horsey in "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen were massacred in Novgorod 700 000 (seven hundred thousand (?)) people.
Guess which of the two numbers is considered historically accurate?
4: 0 in favor of the West.
Wild Russians cry and moan... And they are constantly being hijacked and driven into slavery by the dashing Crimean basurmans. And the Russians cry and pay tribute. Almost all historians point a finger at the stupidity, weakness and cowardice of the Russian rulers, who could not cope even with the spattered Crimea. And for some reason they "forget" that no Crimean Khanate existed - was one of the provinces of the Ottoman Empire, in which there were Turkish garrisons and the Ottoman governor sat. Who has no desire to reproach Castro for not being able to capture a tiny American base on his island?
The Ottoman Empire, by this time, was actively expanding in all directions, conquering all the Mediterranean lands, stretching out from Iran (Persia) and advancing on Europe, approaching Venice and laying siege to Vienna. In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer at the same time the wild, as European brochures assured, Muscovy. From the Crimea to the north moved 120 thousand troops, supported by 20 thousand janissaries and 200 cannons.
Near the village Juveniles the Ottomans faced the 50-thousandth detachment of the governor Mikhaila Vorotynsky... And the Turkish army was ... No, not stopped - cut completely!!!
From that moment on, the Ottomans' offensive on their neighbors stopped - but try to engage in conquests if your army was almost halved! God forbid you to fight off the neighbors yourself. What do you know about this battle? Nothing? That's it! Wait, in 20 years about the participation of Russians in the Second World War, they will also start to "forget" in textbooks. After all, all "progressive humanity" has long and firmly known - Hitler was defeated by the Americans... And it is time to correct the Russian textbooks "wrong" in this area.
Information about the Battle of Molodi can generally be classified as closed. God forbid, the Russian cattle will learn that they can be proud of the deeds of their ancestors in the Middle Ages! He will develop a wrong self-awareness, love for the Fatherland, for her deeds. And this is wrong. So, it is difficult to find data about the Battle of Moldodya, but it is possible - in specialized reference books. For example, in the "Encyclopedia of Armaments" of the KiM three lines are written.
So, 5: 0 in favor of the West.
Stupid Russian idlers... Remembering the Mongol invasion, I am always surprised - where did they manage to collect so many sabers? After all sabers were forged only since the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, in Kubachi. Such is the strange fork - forever we and the Dagestanis suddenly turn out to be the same. Although, in all the textbooks between us there are always a couple of hostile states. Nowhere else in the world have they learned how to forge Is a much more complex art than it might seem.
But progress was coming, the 17th century. The saber gave way to other weapons. Before the birth of Peter 1, there was very little left. What was Russia like? If you believe the textbooks, approximately the same as in Tolstoy's novel "Peter the First" - patriarchal, ignorant, wild, drunk, inert ...
Did you know that it was Russia who armed all of Europe advanced weapons? Every year Russian monasteries and foundries sold hundreds of cannons, thousands of muskets, and edged weapons there. Source - here's a quote from the "Encyclopedia of Arms":
“It is interesting that the manufacturers of artillery pieces in the 16th-17th centuries were not only the sovereign's cannons, but also monasteries. For example, a fairly large production of cannons was carried out in the Solovetsky Monastery and in the Kirillovo-Belozersky Monastery. Owned guns and very successfully used the Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks. The first mention of the use of guns by the Zaporozhye Cossacks dates back to 1516. In the XIX-XX centuries, in Russia and abroad, the opinion was formed that the pre-Petrine artillery was technically backward. But here are the facts: in 1646 the Tula-Kamensk factories supplied the Netherlands with more than 600 guns, and in 1647 360 guns of 4,6 and 8 pounds. In 1675, the Tula-Kamensk factories shipped abroad 116 cast-iron cannons, 43892 balls, 2934 grenades, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron ".
So much for the wild, backward Russia, which they talk about at school.
6: 0 in favor of the West.
By the way, from time to time, I come across Russophobes who argue that all of the above cannot be, since even highly progressive and developed England and France learned to cast iron only in the 19th century. In such cases, I argue for a bottle of cognac and take a person to the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. One of the cast iron cannons cast in 1600, there lies cheekily on a stand for all to see. I have already accumulated 3 bottles of cognac in my bar, but they still don’t believe me. People do not believe that Russia, throughout its history and in all respects, was ahead of Europe by about two centuries. But ...
Loser's conclusions... Starting from school years, we are told that our whole history is like a huge cesspool, in which there is not a single bright spot, not a single decent ruler. There were either no military victories at all, or they led to something bad (the victory over the Ottomans is hidden like codes of nuclear launch, and the victory over Napoleon is duplicated by the slogan Alexander - the gendarme of Europe). Everything that was invented by the ancestors is either brought to us from Europe, or just a baseless myth. The Russian people did not make any discoveries, they did not release anyone, and if someone turned to us for help, it was turning into slavery.
And now everyone around has the historical right of Russians to kill, rob, and rape. To kill a Russian person is not banditry, but a desire for freedom. And the lot of all Russians is to repent, repent and repent.
A little more than a hundred years of information warfare - and a sense of our own inferiority has already been sown in all of us. We are more, like our ancestors, not sure of our own righteousness. See what's going on with our politicians: they constantly make excuses... Nobody demands to bring Lord Jad to trial for propaganda of terrorism and cooperation with bandits - he is persuaded that he is not quite right.
We threaten Georgia - and we do not carry out the threats. Denmark spits in our face - and they don't even impose sanctions against it. The Baltic countries have established an apartheid regime - politicians shyly turn away. People demand to allow the sale of weapons for self-defense - they are openly called worthless cretins who, out of stupidity, will immediately interrupt each other.
Why should Russia make excuses? After all, she is always right! Nobody else dares to say this.
You think - the current politicians are just so indecisive, but instead of them, just about, others will come. But it won't happen NEVER... Because the feeling of inferiority does not come from the post of foreign minister. It begins to be systematically brought up from childhood, when the child is told: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, incapable of making the most elementary decisions. But a kind and smart uncle Rurik came to them from Europe, began to own and teach them. He created the state of Russia for them, in which we live.
The poison, drop by drop, pours into the soul, and when a person leaves school, he gets used to looking at the West as a kind master, more intelligent and developed. And at the words "democracy" begins to reflexively stand on its hind legs.
What the Western world is best at is waging an information war. The blow was struck in the place that no one had thought to defend - according to the educational program. And the West won. It remains to show a little patience - and our children themselves will crawl on their knees in that direction and ask the lowest permission to lick the owners' shoes. Already crawling - a couple of days ago I managed to see a piece of the program "Why does Russia need its own currency?" Correctly. Then there will be: "Why do we need an army?" Then: "Why is statehood needed?"
The West has won. The consignment.
What to do?
If you do not want to make slaves out of children, you need not shout that we will fight when the hour comes, but save them right now... The hour has come, the war is almost over for the overwhelming advantage of the enemy. There is an urgent need to break the course of teaching history, changing the emphasis of teaching to a positive one. My girls are still 4 and 5 years old, but when they go to school, I foresee hard days. Lawsuits for poor quality teaching are guaranteed. If the historian does not teach children about who such an important person in history as Rurik was or does not know about the Molodino battle, then he must pay fines out of his own pocket.
Better yet - file a claim to the ministry of education about dissemination of knowingly false information... Hire a good lawyer and it hurts and hurts to kick them - let them itch. But I don’t have one money for the “good” one. Poorly to throw off in the name of saving the honest name of the ancestors?
The second way to at least slightly strengthen the position on the fronts of the information war is to demand from the procurators to initiate a criminal case on the fact of inciting ethnic hatred, by teaching false historical information. There are a lot of examples. Let us recall the Tatar yoke. We are told that the Tatars oppressed the Russians, but they do not say that the Russians robbed the Tatars no less famously. As a result, Russians have racial resentment towards fellow citizens. Moreover, the insult is wrong. We are all good and behaved exactly the same.
Or, for example, last year in Kazan they celebrated (or tried to celebrate) the day of remembrance of the Tatars who defended the city from Russian troops. There is a clear confrontation on a national basis. Although, in fact, the city was not taken by the Russians, but russian-Tatar (!) troops... Shig-Alei's cavalry provided cover for the streltsy detachments - and if he is a German, then I am ready to recognize myself as Pope. The Russian-Tatar troops took Kazan, eliminating the influence of Istanbul on the Volga, and protecting civilians from predatory raids, liberated tens of thousands of slaves. It is enough to recognize the participation of the Tatars in this noble cause - and the national question loses its acuteness.
But I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t know how to roll out a statement in such a way that it’s not brushed aside and sent to hell.
By the way, the Dallas plan to incite ethnic hatred was mentioned here more than once. And no one paid attention to how it is being implemented. Also at school. Good teachers diligently sow discord between the largest ethnic groups - Russians and Tatars. The entire course of history is filled with pearls about how the Tatars attacked, how the Russians attacked the Tatars, etc. But nowhere is it indicated that the Tatars are our symbiote, our companion people. Tatar units is always were part of the Russian troops, participated in all Russian wars - both internecine and in battles with an external enemy. We can say that tatars are just Russian light cavalry... Or Russians - Tatar forged men. The Tatars fought against Mamai on the Kulikovo field together with the Moscow army, the Tatars were the first to attack the enemy in the Swedish and Livonian wars; in 1410, near Grunwald, the combined Polish-Russian-Tatar army utterly defeated the crusaders, breaking the back of the Teutonic Order - moreover, it was the Tatars who took the first blow.
Sometimes I am asked why I do not mention the Lithuanians. So I mention - Russians. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a Russian state, with a Russian population that spoke Russian, and even the office work was conducted in Russian. Did you think that a small racist country on the Baltic coast was once a great state?
7: 0 in favor of the West.
We lived side by side with the Tatars for four thousand years. We fought, made friends, became related. They smashed the Romans, Crusaders, Ottomans, Poles, Frenchmen, Germans ... And now, our children open the textbook, and it drips from every page: enemies, enemies, enemies ... Legally it is called inciting ethnic hatred... And in fact - conventional information war.
Valery Demin
Program canvas by Ilya Glazunov "Eternal Russia", to see which crowds of Muscovites and visitors once flocked, was originally called "One hundred centuries"... The term was counted from the supposed exodus of the ancient Aryans from their Ancestral Homeland, which was the beginning of the collapse of the primary ethnolinguistic community and the emergence of independent peoples and languages \u200b\u200b(earlier the language was common). The symbol of the former ancestral home - polar world mountain, placed in the upper left corner - and the visual row on the composition of Glazunov opens.
But is it really - hundred centuries? Or ten thousand years does not exhaust the long path and thorny history of the Slavic-Russian tribes and other peoples of the earth? After all, Mikhailo Lomonosov called a completely different date, far beyond the boundaries of the most daring fantasy. Four hundred thousand years (more precisely - 399 000 ) - this is the result obtained by the Russian genius. And he relied on the calculations of Babylonian astronomers and the evidence of the Egyptians, recorded by ancient historians.
It was then that one of the most severe planetary catastrophes in its consequences occurred: according to Lomonosov, it shifted earth axis, the location of the poles changed and, ultimately, as described by Plato in the dialogue "Politician", the Sun, which had previously risen in the west (!), began to rise in the east. According to Herodotus, this happened twice (in fact, our planet was colonized by our ancestors a little more than 600 thousand years ago. The first planetary catastrophe happened a little more than 100 thousand years ago, and the second - a little more than 13 thousand years ago. It was as a result of this catastrophe that it shifted earth axis. D.B.).
In the reconstructed by modern scientists, presumably belonging to the monk of the Kiev-Pechersk Monastery, the monk Nestor, the first real date is 852 year A.D. (or in accordance with the Old Russian chronology - 6360 summer "from the Creation of the world"). In that year, a powerful Russian fleet appeared at the walls of Constantinople, which was recorded in the Byzantine chronicles, and from there fell into the Russian chronicles.
The next, truly significant, date - 862 year - connected with the vocation to reign Rurik with his brothers. It was from that time that it was customary to keep track of Russian history for a long time: in 1862, the so-called 1000th anniversary of Russia was even celebrated, on the occasion of which an impressive monument was erected in Veliky Novgorod designed by the sculptor Mikhail Mikeshin, which became almost a symbol of Russian statehood and monarchism.
But there is one more date in the Russian annals, which is not recognized by official science. We are talking about an ancient Russian work, known by its name, included in many chronographs of the Russian edition: since the 17th century, about a hundred copies of a literary monument are known. It tells about the leaders of the Russian (and the entire Slavic people) who, after long wanderings around the world, appeared on the banks of the Volkhov and Lake Ilmen in the middle of the 3rd millennium BC (!), Having founded cities Slovensk and Staraya Russa, from where they began military campaigns "against the Egyptian and other barbaric countries" (so it is said in the primary source), where they caused "great fear." The Legend also named the exact date of the foundation of Slovenska the Great - 2409 BC (or 3099 from the Creation of the world). Three thousand years later, after two times desolation, a successor was built on the site of the first capital of the Slovenian-Russian state - Novgorod, which also inherited the prefix - Great from his predecessor. (For all this, it must be well remembered that the capital of the Slavic-Aryan Empire more than 100 thousand years there was a city Asgard of Irian, which was destroyed only in the 16th century. Now in its place is the city of Omsk. - D.B.).
Historians-snobs do not see any rational grain in the legendary legends about Ruse and Slovenia, considering them an invention of the purest water, moreover, of a relatively recent time. Nikolay Karamzin, for example, in one of the notes to the 1st volume "History of the Russian State" calls such legends "fairy tales entered into the annals by ignorant people." There is no doubt: of course, unknown historians of the 17th century added something from themselves, especially in terms of sympathies and preferences. Well, who didn’t do that? Karamzin, or what? In terms of the intensity of subjective passions and tendentiousness, "The History of the Russian State" one hundred points will give odds to any chronograph and chronicler.
They also sometimes say: the records of legends about Slovenia and Ruse are of late origin, but if they were recorded somewhere before the Tatar-Mongol invasion, then it would be a completely different matter. What is there to object? Firstly, no one knows whether or not ancient legends were written down at the dawn of ancient Russian literature: thousands and thousands of priceless monuments perished in the fire of conflagrations after the invasion of nomads, their own feuds and the struggle against paganism. Secondly, if we talk by and large about the later recordings, then "Word about Igor's regiment" really came down to us only in Catherine's list XVIII century yes in the first edition of 1800; the original manuscript (also, by the way, of a rather late origin) burned down during the Moscow fire of 1812, and very few people saw it "alive".
And the immortal Kalevala? The Karelian-Finnish runes, which absorbed information about archaic times, were written down and became the property of the readers of the Old and New Worlds only a century and a half ago... Even later, the main body of Russian epics was recorded in the North. Some will say: this is folklore. Who cares? Ancestral and tribal historical legends were passed from generation to generation according to the same mnemonic laws as oral folk art.
That is why the "argument" regarding the late recording of the "Legend of Slovenia and Ruse" does not stand up to criticism. In addition, almost two hundred years earlier, the facts contained in it from the words of oral informants were recorded by the ambassador of the "great Caesar" Sigismund Herberstein in his famous "Notes on Muscovy". And half a thousand years earlier, Byzantine and Arab authors reported about them.
Documentary evidence that the "Legend of Slovenia and Ruse" originally had a long oral circulation is contained in a letter to the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences of one of the early Russian historiographers Petra Krekshina, descended from the Novgorod nobility. Drawing the attention of scholars to the need to take into account and use the chronicle "Tale of Slovenia and Ruse" in historical research, he noted that Novgorodians "have been telling each other about it from time immemorial," that is, they orally pass on the historical tradition from generation to generation. So, with the legendary history of Russia, the situation was not at all the way it seemed to Karamzin and subsequent historians.
In contrast to them, Lomonosov saw in the ancient legends of the Russian people echoes of historical reality and wrote literally the following: even if “the names of Sloven and Rus and other brothers were invented, but there are cases of the Northern Slavs in him [Novgorod chronicler. - VD] described, the truth is not disgusting.
Oral traditions have a completely different life than written ones. As Academician B.D. Greeks, "... in the legends there may be seeds of true truth." Therefore, an indispensable condition for the analytical and semantic study of historical legends is the separation of the "wheat from the chaff". Legends about the origin of any nation have always been kept as the greatest spiritual value and have been carefully passed from mouth to mouth for centuries and millennia. Sooner or later, some ascetic appeared who wrote down the "legends of deep antiquity" or included them in an edited form in the chronicle. Thus, Homer's poems (fictionalized chronicles of the Trojan War) were recorded in ancient times, Russian and Polish legends - at the beginning of the II millennium AD, Rigveda and Avesta - in the 18th century, Russian epics and Karelian-Finnish runes - in the 19th century, etc.
Domestic chronicle writing has always relied on oral, often folklore tradition, in which echoes of past times could not but be preserved. This is also the Primary Russian Chronicle: dedicated to the events that happened before the birth of Nestor the chronicler, relies mainly on oral tradition. Nestor himself does not have the names of Sloven and Rus. There were good reasons for that.
Most of the ancient chronicles that have survived to this day (and, in any case, all those that were elevated to the rank of officialdom) have a Kiev orientation, that is, they were written, edited and corrected to please the ruling Kiev princes-Rurikovich, and later - to please their successors - the Moscow grand dukes and tsars.
The Novgorod chronicles, which have a completely different political orientation and reveal the true historical roots of both the Russian people themselves and the princes who ruled in Russia long before Rurik, were often hushed up or simply destroyed. What happened there before can be judged by the chronicles of the first Novgorod bishop Joachim, which reached only in the retelling included in the "History of Russia" V.N. Tatishcheva.
The initial Novgorod chronicle fundamentally contradicted the interests and attitudes of the Kiev princes, whose ideologists included the monks of the Kiev Caves Lavra, including Nestor. To admit that the Novgorod princes are older than the Kiev ones, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik, was considered in the time of Nestor an unacceptable political sedition. It undermined the right of the Kiev princes to primordial power, and therefore was mercilessly rooted out. Hence it is quite clear why in the "Tale of Bygone Years" there is not a word about Slovenia and Ruse, which laid the foundation for Russian statehood not on the Kiev bank of the Dnieper, but on the banks Volkhova.
Likewise, he ignores Nestor and the last prince of the Doryuric dynasty - Gostomysla, the person is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention oral folk legends. Following Nestor, subsequent historians became infected with this "bad disease" and quickly learned to see in the annals only what corresponded to their subjective opinion.
Why this happened is not at all surprising. Already in the twentieth century, before the eyes, so to speak, of the direct participants in the events, the history of such an epochal event as the October Revolution in Russia was redrawn and rewritten several times. From books, reference books and textbooks dozens and hundreds deleted the names of those who prepared and carried out this revolution. Many of the main leaders of October were completely destroyed physically, and well-known and completely indisputable facts were distorted to please the new temporary workers beyond recognition. Well, after a while, another reassessment of all values \u200b\u200bbegan, and the appearance of the recent temporary workers was distorted beyond recognition. This is our time! What, then, can be said about the affairs of bygone days?
However, indirect, references to at least Slovenia in the Nestorov Chronicle still survived, despite the tough political attitude and the later erasures of the Kiev censors. For example, in the "Tale of Bygone Years" there is one, at first glance, strange phrase: the inhabitants of Veliky Novgorod, they say, "First of all, bo besha slovenia"... This passage is translated and interpreted in such a sense that the Novgorodians were formerly Slavs. Absurd, of course, you cannot imagine: how is it so - "there were Slavs." Now who are they?
Everything is explained, however, very simply: Novgorod was built on the site of the old capital Slovenska, named after the prince of Sloven, the founder of the capital city. That is why Novgorod is called the "new city", that they erected it on the site of the "old", and the former nickname of the Novgorodians is "Slovenia", that is, "the inhabitants of Slovensk". Lomonosov explained it this way: “Before the election and arrival of Rurikov, Slavic peoples lived within the Russian borders. Firstly, the Novgorodians were called Slavs by their excellent name and the city from the old days was known as Slovenian ”.
Of course, the fact that the "Slovenes" were inhabitants and subjects of ancient Slovensk, founded by Prince Sloven, was well known to both Nestor and his contemporaries. But the author of The Tale of Bygone Years did not speak about it - he was afraid or did not dare. So I had to adjust the story to the interests of the customer. This has been the case at all times - right up to the present day. After all, The Tale of Bygone Years is not a dispassionate narrative work, but an acutely polemical and accusatory work, which manifests itself especially where an Orthodox monk denounces paganism or polemicizes with gentiles - Muslims, Jews, Catholics. But not only!
The entire Primary Chronicle has a clearly expressed tendentious orientation. Its author needed, first of all, to prove the primacy of the Kiev princes and the legitimacy of the Rurik dynasty. In this connection, let us take another look at the famous introduction (opening) to The Tale of Bygone Years: "Behold the tales of time years, where the Russian land came from, who in Kiev began the first princes, and from where the Russian land began to eat".
Most modern readers see in Nestorov's words a set of three interrogative, almost elegiac, sentences with poetic repetitions. In reality, there are no questions here, but peremptory statements (almost political slogans that are understandable to Nestor's contemporaries). There are purely rhetorical methods here, conditioned by polemical needs. Nestor, by all means, needs to prove that the Kiev princes Rurikovich are the "first" in Russia of anyone else. "First" in the sense "earlier" - this is the main thing, keyword Nestorov's beginnings, and the entire chronicle as a whole.
Consequently, the seemingly neutral question: "Who in Kiev began to reign first" - has the most important (albeit hidden) ideological meaning and implies the ending: "Who began to reign in Kiev earlier than in some kind of Novgorod, that is, the former Slovenske the Great ". That is why the initial statement was repeated almost word for word, which I want to read: “Now I’ll explain to you,“ where did the Russian land come from ”-“ From here, from Kiev, it began to eat, and from nowhere else ””! By the way, Kiev is remembered only in the Laurentian list of Nestorova's "Tale". In the Ipatiev Chronicle, the beginning is inscribed without any mention of Kiev.
Amazing metamorphoses take place in the annals and with Novgorod. How freely and shamelessly the subsequent editors and scribes treated Nestorov's text can be seen from at least one single, but fundamentally important, phrase. It concerns the distribution of Russian lands after the calling of the princes. All modern translations of The Tale of Bygone Years, anthologies, scientific compilations and textbooks say that after arriving in Russia, Rurik began to reign in Novgorod, Sineus - on Beloozero, and Truvor - in Izborsk.
In reality in the most ancient and authoritative chronicles something completely different is said about Rurik. The Ipatiev and Radziwil annals say that, having come to the Novgorod land, the Varangian brothers first of all “cut down” the city of Ladoga - Rurik “sat down” in it and began to rule. Consequently, Ladoga is the first capital of the new ruling Rurik dynasty. The fact that Novgorod the Great was elected by Rurik as the capital city, in this fragment of the chronicles does not say anything at all. In the Laurentian list, there is generally a gap in this place.
This lacuna Karamzin and filled with Novgorod... Its creator, The History of the Russian State, borrowed from the now inaccessible and obviously late Trinity Chronicle, which burned down along with other priceless relics of Russian culture during the famous Moscow fire of 1812.
Karamzin managed to make extensive extracts from the lost list. But, what is curious: in the text of the Trinity Chronicle itself, as well as in the Laurentian list, there was a gap at the place where the first capital of Rurik was mentioned. But in the margins, by the hand of some late reader, postscript - "Novgorod" (in those days, decorating the fields of ancient books with your own notes was considered in the order of things). Karamzin, without hesitation, chose this foreign postscript of the 18th century as a template for his version of the episode with the "calling of princes", which became canon for most subsequent interpretations.
The mention of Novgorod in Karamzin's synopsis, which had nothing to do with Nestor the chronicler, was immediately canonized, absolutized and declared the ultimate truth. So, seemingly out of good intentions, an elementary forgery and falsification stories. Karamzin is still being passed off as Nestor, but the inexperienced reader does not even think that all this is sewn with white thread.
The strange legibility in the choice of idols is also surprising: Karamzin's extracts from the lost Trinity Chronicle are recognized as more reliable than the text of Nestor the chronicler himself, but a similar concise retelling by Tatishchev of the lost Joachim Chronicle, which does not coincide with the official and official points of view, is considered dubious and almost fake.
From all of the above, it also becomes clear that at first glance a strange circumstance why "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse" a powerful stream of manuscripts entered the everyday life of Russian life, starting only from the 17th century. Why this happened is not difficult to guess, in general. In 1613, at the Zemsky Sobor in Moscow, Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, a representative of a new dynasty that ruled in Russia until 1917, was elected tsar. Rurik's family faded away, and one could no longer be afraid of persecution and reprisals for the propaganda of seditious works that refute the official (in the past) point of view.
Until recently, for such freethinking, one could get on the chopping block or on the rack and, at best, lose his tongue (so as not to talk) and eyes (so as not to read). Well, how they dealt with dissent and free-thinking in the days of the "independent" Novgorod Republic, with chilling details is set forth in documentary narratives about the campaign of the Sovereign of All Russia Ivan Vasilyevich III to Veliky Novgorod in the summer of 1471.
After the Shelon battle on the ashes of Staraya Russa (is it not mysticism - in the city founded by the forefather Rus) by the Great himself prince of Moscow a demonstrative reprisal was committed against adherents of Novgorod independence and supporters of Martha Posadnitsa, who advocated the annexation of Novgorod to the Commonwealth. To begin with, the noses, lips and ears of ordinary prisoners were cut off and, in this form, they were released to their homes for a visual demonstration that henceforth awaits any troublemakers who disagree with the position of the supreme Moscow power. The captive governors were taken to the Old Russian square, and before cutting off their heads, each had a tongue cut out and thrown to the hungry dogs to eat (so that it would be discouraging to talk to others, which should not be).
Truly "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse" should become one of the most famous works of Russian literature - so far it is famous only for what is known to a narrow circle of skeptical specialists and unknown to a wide circle of readers.
The restoration of the trampled truth is an urgent requirement of the present day! () The first state
Roman Kedrov
It is generally accepted that the first state in the history of mankind is Sumer... But this is, to put it mildly, not so. Earlier states are known. The only reason it doesn't recognize them historical science Is what they are created not Semitic, and our ancestors, russians... And here it is impossible to keep silent about the settlement of the Indo-European Rus in Chatal-uyuke (in another way - Chatal Huyuke, Chatal Guyuk).
This archaeological site of paramount importance is located in Asia Minor, on the territory of present-day Turkey, in the central plateau of Anatolia, in the valley of the Konya River, 34 kilometers from the city of the dervishes of Konya and 130 kilometers from the Mediterranean coast.
The time of its heyday - 8,000 (!) Years BC! Sumer is just resting.
The settlement of the Indo-European Rus in Chatal-uyuk (do not be confused by the Turkish-speaking name, it is only the modern name of this region of Turkey, we do not know the real name of this city, because there were no Turks then) covers an area of \u200b\u200b13 hectares. Only 4 (four!) Percent of this area has been uncovered. We do not know what results the opening of at least a third or a quarter of the settlement would have - it is quite possible that it would have significantly expanded the scope of the city-state existence, would have yielded new impressive finds ... However, we have to be content with what we have.
The history of the archaeological excavations of Chatal-uyuk itself is regrettable. As soon as the scientists who carried out the opening of the settlement, it was established with complete certainty that they were dealing with one of the most ancient Indo-European (i.e. russians) crops, funding was immediately stopped. All works were closed, or rather, just abandoned... There was not even a professional conservation of the excavation.
A unique archaeological site of the planet, which, according to all the rules, must be included in the UNESCO lists and be carefully guarded, as a cultural heritage of earthly civilization, is actually slowly being destroyed, open to rain and wind - there are not even elementary sheds over the most unique excavation, open and defenseless walls sanctuaries, made of raw bricks, are sliding, crumbling, overgrown with weeds.
Certain financial circles The "world community", sparing no expense to carry out exploration work in the direction they need, have imposed a strict ban on the continuation of excavations in Chatal-uyuk. This alone explains the categorical refusal of the Turkish government to issue a license to anyone to continue archaeological work.
The settlement of the Rus of the Neolithic period, like many other archaeological sites of the Middle East, is doomed to complete destruction for one reason - it and its findings do not fit into the official historical scheme, according to which, the founders of earthly civilization and the first states were the Semitic ethnic groups of the Middle East.
The scientific world of the planet, most of which is well versed in the essence of the matter, silently gazes at the monstrous barbarism being carried out. And, nevertheless, the true archaeological treasures of the Indo-Europeans that were discovered in the settlement of Chatal-uyuka can no longer be hidden. The finds were so sensationalthat information about them leaked to the scientific press, despite all the taboos and prohibitions. The world learned about the existence of the highest Indo-European culture in the Middle East many millennia before the appearance of the first Semites there.
Up to 7 thousand inhabitants lived in Chatal-uyuk. And this is only within the city limits. Livestock was not kept in the city, for this there were large fenced corrals outside the city, which were constantly guarded by shepherds living there with their families. The Rus of Chatala were farmers - significant land plots surrounded the city. Taking this into account, we can add another two to three thousand people to the population of the settlement.
And how is a city with a population of 10 thousand worse than the city-states of Sumer, which had much fewer inhabitants, and most importantly, much younger? Only by the fact that it was built not by the Semites, but by the Russians!
Rus-Indo-Europeans very thoroughly took care of their life. Unlike the semi-savage tribes around them, they could afford it. At the same time, such a layout - house to house - did not give an opportunity for outsiders-robbers to enter the city. The settlement itself was one large fortress, the outer walls of which were the strongest and thickest.
The Rus of Chatala skillfully used bows. On alarm, thousands of archers climbed to the rooftops, moved to the outermost houses and from above showered the strangers with a hail of arrows. The settlement was impregnable... And in it, unlike most other settlements of the Rus of the Middle East, no traces of pogroms have survived. The savage pogromists were not allowed inside. The Rus of Chatala skillfully wielded sling and spears. From the remaining murals depicting coordinated military operations, from the many identified tips of combat arrows, spears, stone and clay balls for sling, battle axes, maces, we can judge a high degree of military organization Rus of central Anatolia.
Among the Russians of Chatala, there was a clear social stratification into chieftains-princes, priests-magi, warriors-vigilantes and farmers. That is, there was a "caste" division inherent in the Indo-Europeans within society. At the same time, each farmer was a warrior of a large squad, a militia. And professional warriors - the prince's inner circle - did not shy away from working on the ground (traditions that have survived to our time in the Cossacks are a warrior-farmer).
The warriors at that time were thoroughly armed. Whole treasures of many obsidian arrowheads, spears, and darts were found under the floors of the dwellings. Obsidian combat knives were not only serious weapons, but also works of art. Their handles were made with great care. Obsidian was a significant source of income for the Chatal Rus. Actually, we must clearly imagine - in the period from the 12th to the 2nd millennium BC. all trade, all trade exchange and everything accompanying them were completely in the hands of the Indo-Europeans.
The Rus were pioneering monopolists not only in the field of construction, architecture, agriculture and cattle breeding, applied crafts, martial arts, technological innovations, but also in the broadest trade. Huge spaces, lack of transport and road networks were not obstacles for them. The Rus moved, traveled, walked, traveled and swam throughout the then Ecumene, throughout the inhabited world. And yet, the basis for everything, the basis of the foundations, remained developed and well-established agriculture... Regularly harvested crops made it possible to make substantial stocks for the future, which freed up the time needed for all other activities.
The Chatala Rus were extremely skillful farmers and sedentary pastoralists. 22 species of useful plants were cultivated in Chatal-uyuk. And in homes - for the first time in the history of mankind - pots with decorative house plants-flowers appeared. But in agriculture, the Russians of Chatal-uyuk also had special merits. They were the first irrigators in the world - their fields irrigated by an elaborate canal system... For the Neolithic era, this was a brilliant achievement. Perhaps no less than the world's first roads of the Rus-Khirokitians.
And, although it is customary to say that "civilization began in Sumer" (a hackneyed phrase in textbooks and encyclopedias), in fact and unambiguously civilization began in Jericho and Chatal-uyuk, many millennia before Sumer. And the founders of earthly civilization were all the same Rus ... ( in fact, our planet was colonized by the Slavic-Aryans over 600 thousand years ago. See subsection).
The Rus Chatala, like all other representatives of the Homo sapiens of the planet, have not yet switched to " bronze age". Although, some researchers believe that the founders of metallurgy were the inhabitants of Chatal-uyuk. Dumps were found on the outskirts of the settlement waste copper ores, pieces of slag, in the workshops there were furnaces, very suitable for smelting metals. But exact proofs - blacksmith tools and complex copper or other metal products - have not yet been found in Chatal-uyuk ( 96% of the site has not been excavated).
Colored painted reliefs and wall paintings of Chatala amazed the imagination, such a wealth of colors, scenes, plots before this settlement had not been found anywhere else. The Rus of Chatal-uyuk did not yet have a written language. They did not leave us chronicles and other written sources about their people. But according to the totality of the elements of their magical-pictorial culture, ritual and everyday traditions, archaeological artifacts, anthropological and ethnographic data, we can only attribute them to the Indo-European Rus of the Middle East. And the silence of such achievements of the Russians, i.e., our ancestors, by official science, only on the basis of their nationality, is a crime, moreover, typical genocide.
Why are “human rights defenders” silent? A rhetorical question... ().
The land of cities lies in the south Chelyabinsk region, in the interfluve of the Urals in the west and the Tobol in the east. The archaeological country of Sintashta and Arkaim stretches along the eastern slopes of the Urals from north to south 400 km and on 100-150 km from west to east. A group of fortified settlements dating from abroad 3-2 - early 2nd millennium BC They are contemporaries of the first dynasty of Babylon, the pharaohs of the Middle Kingdom of Egypt and the Cretan-Mycenaean culture of the Mediterranean. The time of their existence corresponds to the last centuries of the famous civilization of India - Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa.
Today there are 17 known settlements with 21 fortified settlements, as well as numerous settlements and burial grounds. The fortified centers were located at a distance of 40-70 km from each other. Thus, the average radius of the developed territory for each such center was approximately 25-30 km, which corresponds to the distance of one day's crossing. Within these limits, in the vicinity of the “city”, there were seasonal camps for cattle breeders and fishermen, small, unfortified settlements of people were built, which were closely connected in economic, military and religious terms with the “city-fortress”, with the “city-temple”.
Aerial photographs show that the “cities” of the South Urals have different layouts - oval, circle, square. Most often, a circle and a square are combined with each other, but the leading one is always any one of the geometric shapes. The location of houses, outbuildings, streets is always determined by the layout of the outer defensive wall.
The earliest of the surveyed monuments of the "Country of cities" are probably settlements with an oval layout, then circular and square settlements appear. Various geometric symbolism in the plans reflects, most likely, the distinctive features of the religious worldview.
Despite their small size, the fortified centers can be called proto-cities. They are distinguished by powerful defensive structures, monumentality of architecture, complex systems communications. The territory is very compact and well thought out.
All settlements occupy flat dry areas along the banks of small steppe rivers, rarely - lakes. These areas are necessarily inscribed within some boundaries indicated by nature. Usually they are surrounded by water channels or troughs of old channels, which are filled with water during spring floods. If necessary, a special channel was dug out, which connected the channels and created a closed water system.
The defensive fortifications of the "Country of Cities" are striking in their complexity. The thickness of the main walls at the base is 5-5.5 m, additional or citadel walls - 2-3 m. They were built from large adobe blocks and partially faced with stone (Alandskoe, Olginskoe).
Usually, the basis of the wall structures are log cabins or two longitudinal wooden walls connected by transverse logs. The spaces between the walls were filled with liquid soil or mud blocks. Outside, wooden log walls were coated with clay, covered with mud blocks, sometimes in combination with stone. The reconstructed height of the log-soil structures is about 3.5 m.
Judging by the preserved slopes of the foundations of the walls, the width of the upper platforms of the defensive wall structures was 3-4 m. There was a wooden wall on the platform, which played the role of a parapet or parapet and, probably, served as a shield for the people who defended the fortress. In front of the defensive wall there was a moat, the walls of which were fixed with wood, mud brickwork, and a wattle covered with clay. Its depth was 2-3 m with a width of 4 to 6.5 m. The ditch was kept dry.
Outside the ditch, on its outer side, there may be another wall made of raw material (Aland), or a soil embankment with a wooden parapet-palisade (Bersuat, Sintashta). There is usually a narrow ditch in front of the embankment for the drainage of flood and storm water. Thus, the depth of the external defensive system (the depth of defense), together with the storm structures of the Arkaim "cities", was 16-20 meters!
Necropolises are usually located not far from settlements - from several tens of meters to a kilometer. The layout of the burial mound complex is based on a circle with a well-defined square in the center, emphasized by the outline of large grave pits, wooden beams, and earthwork. This layout is close to the mandala principle - one of the main sacred symbols of Buddhist philosophy. The word "mandala" itself is translated as "circle", "disc", "circular". In the Rig Veda, where it first appears, the word has many meanings: “wheel”, “ring”, “country”, “space”, “society”, “assembly”. There is a universal interpretation of the mandala as a model of the Universe, a "map of the cosmos", while the Universe is modeled and depicted in plan using a circle, square or their combination.
Arkaim and his dwellings, where the wall of one house is the wall of another, probably reflect the "circle of time" in which each unit is determined by the previous one and determines the next.
Geography "Country of cities", settlement plans, fortification, house-building, chariots, the structure of society and much more, find a correspondence in the religious hymns of Indo-Aryans and Indo-Iranians "Rigveda" and "Avesta". The uniqueness of the "Country of Cities" lies in the amazing preservation of the early cultural layers, starting from the 4th millennium BC
Not a single archaeological site in the world can be compared in this parameter with the South Urals. And this despite the fact that ancient population built their proto-cities from improvised material (sand, clay, wood), fully embodying the philosophy of that time "man is a part of the Universe."
In December 2003, an initiative group of employees of the State Institution Specialized Natural Landscape and Historical-Archaeological Center "Arkaim" (L.L. Gaiduchenko, GB Zdanovich, E.A. Chibilev), Ilmensky State Reserve (A.V. Lagunov ) and the Miass City Ecological Center (P.E. Brusyanin), in order to preserve unique historical and natural objects in the steppe zone of the Chelyabinsk region, it was proposed to create a regional protected area - the natural park "Country of cities".
Village Paris
There is in the Chelyabinsk region, on the road from Magnitogorsk to Yuzhnouralsk Nagaybaksky district, a village Paris... Sources on the Web unanimously insist that this name came from local peasants - Nagaybaks, who allegedly served in the Cossacks and fought in Europe. Here, they say, and remembered a few tricky names. In the Land of Cities, there is not only Paris. There is also Varna, and Fershampenoise, and Andrianople, and Sintashta, and Bersuat, and Konoplyanka, and so on. This is what a good memory the Nagaybaks have, they remembered even those places where they had never been ...
The main attraction of the village Paris - Eiffel Tower on a scale of 1: 6. It was built by specialists from the Zlatoust Metalwork Plant by order of the Ural mobile operator, who spent, according to the Internet, 4 million rubles. more than if it were an ordinary tower ... To make an exact copy, the designers even traveled to France, which also cost more than a penny. The question: “why was this done in reality?” We will leave unanswered. A thinking reader will easily figure it out himself. After all Paris just a few centuries ago it was a real village. And our village more than 4000 years ago was already Paris…
Paris - the most common village in the south of the Chelyabinsk region with one-story private houses and several two-story buildings from the times of the Khrushchev period in the center. There are almost no historical buildings left, everything burned down in fires. All old street names were changed during the Soviet period. They left only the central street - Vorstadt, which means "outskirts" in German.
French in Paris nobody speaks. The local population - Nagaybaki - speaks two languages \u200b\u200bsince childhood, native Nagaybak and Russian. But it was not always so. The current generation of thirty-forty-year-olds in childhood have rarely seen Russians and spoke only the national language. Then there were no paved roads, and contacts with Russian-speaking neighbors were very episodic ...
On the campaign of Alexander the Great to Russia
N.S. Cities
In 1918, the Bolsheviks shot the Grand Duke Nikolai Mikhailovich. He was a historian, had access to the imperial and family archives... Studying the life of his crowned ancestor, he came to the conclusion that Alexander I did not die in Taganrog in 1825, and for another 35 years he lived in Siberia, most of it in Tomsk, under the name of Elder Fyodor Kuzmich. For this work N.M. Romanov was elected a member french academy sciences, his work was so highly appreciated.
THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA WAS ALREADY LONG AND VERY, VERY SUCCESSFULLY Of course, not on the battlefields, where we always beat everyone and hurt everyone, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars. The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are a stupid, brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere in the 6-7th category, without past and future. And he has practically proved that even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach completely and completely.
EXAMPLE 1 Recently we celebrated the 1000th anniversary of Russia. And when did it actually appear? The first capital, the city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 after the creation of the world); source of information - the chronicle of the Servant Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovy" by S. Herberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse", which has a widespread circulation and was recorded by many ethnographers. Since it is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovensk, I pestered the leading archaeologists, as far as it is plausible. Literally, they answered me like this: “Who the hell knows. We have already dug up to the Paleolithic sites there ”.
EXAMPLE 2 It is generally accepted that somewhere in the 8th century, wild, brainless and worthless Slavs, wandering herds through the forests, called the Viking Rurik to themselves and said: “Take over us, oh great European superman, otherwise we, idiots, we ourselves can’t do anything. ” (Free presentation of a history textbook). In fact, Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of lesser rank. He was called together with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or perished in the wars. He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim's Chronicle, Russian history according to Tatishchev, "Brockhaus and Efron", etc.
EXAMPLE 3 The opinion is widely spread that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, a model of legality and morality. In general, that the gladiatorial battles of Rome, that the modern indulgence of marauders in Iraq - one field of berries. The morale of the Western world has not changed much, and as before it causes disgust among "savages" like Russians, Chinese, and Dagestanis. Official history: the great, beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of smelly, shaggy savages. In fact, the geeks, who had become sick of all, were sanitized by more decent neighbors. The main source of information is "Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art" A. M. Khazanov. The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to "cleanse" Rome? Ob, Ugra, Volga region, Ural, Azov ... Graves with partial weapons of cataphracts were found in Dagestan. Have you, comrades patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome from? Why was "wild Russia" in Europe called Gardarik - the Country of Cities? Now it doesn't matter, because we are celebrating 1000 years of Russia with joyful faces, we consider Rurik to be the master who came from Norway, who founded Russia, and even, it seems, are proud of this story.
THE HUNDRED AND NUDE, BADLY ARMED ROMAN INFANTRY WAS STOPPED IN STEEL FROM MUSHROOMS AND TO HORSE HOOTS BY CATAPHRACTARIA
4 MILLENNIUMS SENT BY THE TAILS AS uninteresting - AND NOT A DOG EVEN WASTE. 1: 0 FOR THE WEST. The second goal was against the Russian fools. In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes nailed a shield to the gates of Constantinople, and it is difficult to assert that Russia did not exist even then. Therefore, in the coming centuries, long-term slavery was planned for Russia. The invasion of the Mongol-Tatars and 3 centuries of obedience and humility. What marks this era in reality? We will not deny the Mongol yoke, but ... As soon as it became known in Russia about the existence of the Golden Horde, young guys immediately went there to ... rob the Mongols who came from rich China to Russia. The Russian raids of the 14th century are best described (if anyone has forgotten, the period from the 14th to the 15th century is considered a yoke). In 1360, Novgorod lads fought along the Volga to the Kamsky mouth, and then took by storm the large Tatar city of Zhukotin (Dzhuketau near the modern city of Chistopol). Having seized untold riches, the ushkuiniks returned back and began to "drink zipuns" in the city of Kostroma. From 1360 to 1375, the Russians made eight major campaigns on the middle Volga, not counting small raids. In 1374, the Novgorodians took the town of Bolgar (not far from Kazan) for the third time, then went down and took Sarai itself - the capital of the Great Khan.
EXAMPLE 4. TO BEAT THE TATAR, IN RUSSIA WAS CONSIDERED NOT A FEAT, BUT A HARVEST In 1375, the Smolensk guys in seventy boats under the command of the governors Prokop and Smolyanin moved down the Volga. By tradition, they made a "visit" to the cities of Bolgar and Saray. Moreover, the rulers of the Bolgar, taught by bitter experience, paid off with a large tribute, but the khan's capital Sarai was taken by storm and plundered. In 1392, the ushkuyniks again took Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409, voivode Anfal led 250 ushkues to the Volga and Kama. And in general, to beat the Tatars, in Russia was considered not a feat, but a trade. During the Tatar "yoke" Russians went to the Tatars every 2-3 years, Sarai was fired dozens of times, Tatars were sold to Europe in hundreds. What did the Tatars do in response? We wrote complaints! To Moscow, to Novgorod. The complaints persisted. The "enslavers" could not do anything else. The source of information on the mentioned campaigns - you will laugh, but this is a monograph by the Tatar historian A. Kh. Khalikov. They still cannot forgive us for these visits! And at school they still tell how Russian gray-legged men cried and gave their girls into slavery - because they were submissive cattle. And you, their descendants, also penetrate this idea 2: 0 in favor of the West
EXAMPLE 5 In the 16th century, Ivan the Terrible came to power. During his reign in Russia: - jury trial was introduced; - free primary education (church schools); - medical quarantine at the borders; - local elected self-government, instead of the governor; - slave labor is prohibited (source - Ivan the Terrible's code of law); - for the first time there was a regular army (and the world's first military uniform - at the archers); - equality was established between all strata of the population (do you know that serfdom did not exist in Russia at all at that time? The peasant was obliged to sit on the land until he paid for its rent, and nothing more. And his children were considered free from birth, in any case!).
WHAT HAVE YOU TELLED ABOUT DREAMING AT SCHOOL? THAT HE IS A BLOODY SAMODUR AND LOST THE LEBON WAR, AND RUSSIA SHAKED IN HORROR? - the state monopoly on the fur trade, introduced by Grozny, was canceled only 10 (ten!) Years ago. - the territory of the country has been increased 30 times! - the emigration of the population from Europe exceeded 30,000 families (those who settled along the Zasechnaya line were paid a lifting 5 rubles per family. Expense books were preserved). - the growth of the well-being of the population (and the taxes paid) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) Percent. - for the entire period of the reign there was not a single person executed without trial and investigation, the total number of the "repressed" ranged from three to four thousand. (And the times were dashing - remember St. Bartholomew's night). 3: 0 in favor of the West.
IN GENERAL, OUR TEXTBOOKS ARE PROCEEDED FROM THE PRINCIPLE, EVERYTHING THAT SAYS ABOUT RUSSIA IS VEGETABLE, THIS IS TRUTH. EVERYTHING THAT SAYS GOOD OR MIND IS A LIE. Already in the 16th century, many brochures were published in Europe for every mindless man in the street. There it was written that the Russian tsar was a drunkard and a debaucher, and all his subjects were the same wild freaks. And in the instructions to the ambassadors it was indicated that the tsar is a teetotaler, unpleasantly clever, categorically cannot stand drunkards, and even forbade drinking alcohol in Moscow, as a result of which one can only get drunk outside the city, in the so-called "liqueurs" (the place where they pour) ... Source - study "Ivan the Terrible" by Kazimir Walishevsky, France. Now guess three times - which of the two versions is set out in the textbooks? One example. In 1569 Grozny came to Novgorod, which had approximately 40,000 inhabitants. There was an epidemic raging, and it smelled of riot. According to the results of the sovereign's stay, the memorial lists fully preserved in the synodiks mark 2800 dead. But Jerome Horsey in "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen massacred 700,000 (seven hundred thousand (?)) People in Novgorod. Guess which of the two numbers is considered historically accurate? 4: 0 in favor of the West.
WILD RUSSIANS cry and groan. And THEY ARE CONSTANTLY HUNTED AND RUNNED INTO SLAVERY BY THE DYING CRIMEAN BASURMANS And the Russians cry and pay tribute. Almost all historians point a finger at the stupidity, weakness and cowardice of the Russian rulers, who could not cope even with the spattered Crimea. And for some reason they “forget” that there was no Crimean Khanate - there was one of the provinces of the Ottoman Empire, in which there were Turkish garrisons and the Ottoman governor sat. Who has no desire to reproach Castro for not being able to capture a tiny American base on his island? The Ottoman Empire, by this time, was actively expanding in all directions, conquering all the Mediterranean lands, stretching out from Iran (Persia) and advancing on Europe, approaching Venice and laying siege to Vienna. In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer at the same time the wild, as European brochures assured, Muscovy. 120 thousand troops moved from the Crimea to the north, supported by 20 thousand janissaries and 200 cannons. Near the village of Molodi, the Ottomans encountered a 50,000-strong detachment of Voivode Mikhaila Vorotynsky. And the Turkish army was ... No, not stopped - completely cut out !!!
5: 0 IN FAVOR OF THE WEST From that moment, the Ottomans' offensive against their neighbors stopped - but try to engage in conquests, if your army was almost halved! God forbid you to fight off the neighbors yourself. What do you know about this battle? Nothing? That's it! Wait, in 20 years about the participation of Russians in the Second World War will also begin to be "forgotten" in textbooks. After all, all "progressive humanity" has long and firmly known - Hitler was defeated by the Americans. And it is time to correct the Russian textbooks "wrong" in this area. Information about the Battle of Molodi can generally be classified as closed. God forbid, the Russian cattle will learn that they can be proud of the deeds of their ancestors in the Middle Ages! He will develop a wrong self-awareness, love for the Fatherland, for her deeds. And this is wrong. So, it is difficult to find data about the Battle of Moldodya, but it is possible - in reference books. For example, in the "Arms Encyclopedia" three lines are written.
6: 0 FOR THE WEST. Stupid Russian bums. Remembering the Mongol invasion, I am always surprised - where did they manage to collect so many sabers? After all, sabers were forged only since the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, in Kubachi. Such is the strange fork - forever we and the Dagestanis suddenly turn out to be the same. Although, in all the textbooks between us there are always a couple of hostile states. Nowhere else in the world has they learned to forge - it is a much more complex art than it might seem. Did you know that it was Russia that armed all of Europe with advanced weapons? Every year Russian monasteries and foundries sold hundreds of cannons, thousands of muskets, and edged weapons there. Source - here's a quote from the "Encyclopedia of Arms": "It is interesting that the manufacturers of artillery in the XVI-XVII centuries were not only the sovereign's cannons, but also monasteries. For example, a fairly large production of cannons was carried out in the Solovetsky Monastery and in the Kirillovo-Belozersky Monastery. Owned guns and very successfully used the Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks. The first mention of the use of guns by the Zaporozhye Cossacks dates back to 1516. In the XIX-XX centuries, in Russia and abroad, the opinion was formed that the pre-Petrine artillery was technically backward. But here are the facts: in 1646 the Tula-Kamensk factories supplied the Netherlands with more than 600 guns, and in 1647 360 guns of 4, 6 and 8 pounds. In 1675 Tulsko. Kamensk factories shipped abroad 116 cast iron cannons, 43892 cannon balls, 2934 grenades, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron. " So much for the wild, backward Russia, which they talk about at school.
EXAMPLE 6 By the way, from time to time, I come across Russophobes who argue that all of the above cannot be, since even highly progressive and developed England and France learned to cast iron only in the 19th century. In such cases, I argue for a bottle of cognac and take a person to the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. One of the cast-iron cannons, cast in 1600, lies cheekily there on a stand for all to see. I have already accumulated 3 bottles of cognac in my bar, but they still don’t believe me. People do not believe that Russia, throughout its history and in all respects, was ahead of Europe by about two centuries. But ...
LOSER'S CONCLUSIONS. Starting from school years, we are told that our whole history is like a huge cesspool, in which there is not a single bright spot, not a single decent ruler. There were either no military victories at all, or they led to something bad (the victory over the Ottomans is hidden like codes of nuclear launch, and the victory over Napoleon is duplicated by the slogan Alexander - the gendarme of Europe). Everything that was invented by the ancestors is either brought to us from Europe, or just a baseless myth. The Russian people did not make any discoveries, they did not release anyone, and if someone turned to us for help, it was turning into slavery. And now everyone around has the historical right of Russians to kill, rob, and rape. To kill a Russian person is not banditry, but a desire for freedom. And the lot of all Russians is to repent, repent and repent. A little more than a hundred years of information warfare - and a sense of our own inferiority has already been sown in all of us. We are more, like our ancestors, not sure of our own righteousness. We threaten Georgia - and we do not carry out the threats. Denmark spits in our face - and they don't even impose sanctions against it. The Baltic countries have established an apartheid regime - politicians shyly turn away.
WHY RUSSIA SHOULD JUSTIFY? IN FACT SHE IS ALWAYS RIGHT! NO ONE ELSE DECIDES TO SAY ABOUT THIS. You think - the current politicians are just so indecisive, but instead of them, just about, others will come. But this will never happen. Because the feeling of inferiority does not come from the post of foreign minister. It begins to be systematically brought up from childhood, when the child is told: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, incapable of making the most elementary decisions. But a kind and intelligent uncle Rurik came to them from Europe, began to own and teach them. He created the state of Russia for them, in which we live. The poison, drop by drop, pours into the soul, and when a person leaves school, he already gets used to looking at the West as a kind master, more intelligent and developed. And at the words "democracy" begins to reflexively stand on its hind legs. What the Western world does best is waging an information war. The blow was struck in the place that no one had thought to protect - according to the educational program. And the West won. It remains to show a little patience - and our children themselves will crawl on their knees in that direction and ask the lowest permission to lick the owners' shoes. They are already crawling - a couple of days ago I managed to see a piece of the program “Why does Russia need its own currency? " Correctly. Then there will be: “Why do we need an army? ". Then: “Why is statehood needed? "The West has won. The consignment.
INCREASING INTERNATIONAL DISSOLVE BY TEACHING FALSE HISTORICAL INFORMATION The second way to at least slightly strengthen the position on the fronts of the information war is to demand from the prosecutors to initiate a criminal case on the fact of inciting ethnic hatred by teaching false historical information. There are a lot of examples. Let us recall the Tatar yoke. We are told that the Tatars oppressed the Russians, but they do not say that the Russians robbed the Tatars no less famously. As a result, Russians have racial resentment towards fellow citizens. Moreover, the insult is wrong. We are all good and behaved exactly the same. Or, for example, last year in Kazan they celebrated (or tried to celebrate) the day of remembrance of the Tatars who defended the city from Russian troops. There is a clear confrontation on a national basis. Although, in fact, the city was taken not by Russians, but by Russian-Tatar (!) Troops. Shig-Alei's cavalry provided cover for the streltsy detachments - and if he is a German, then I am ready to recognize myself as Pope. Good teachers diligently sow discord between the largest ethnic groups - Russians and Tatars. The entire course of history is filled with pearls about how the Tatars attacked, how the Russians attacked the Tatars, and so on. But nowhere is it indicated that the Tatars are our symbiote, our people's companion. Tatar units have always been part of the Russian troops, participated in all Russian wars - both internecine and in battles with an external enemy. We can say that the Tatars are just Russian light cavalry. Or Russians - Tatar forged men. The Tatars fought against Mamai on the Kulikovo field together with the Moscow army, the Tatars were the first to attack the enemy in the Swedish and Livonian wars; in 1410, near Grunwald, the combined Polish-Russian-Tatar army utterly defeated the crusaders, breaking the back of the Teutonic Order - moreover, it was the Tatars who took the first blow.
7: 0 FOR THE WEST. Sometimes I am asked why I do not mention the Lithuanians. So I mention - Russians. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a Russian state, with a Russian population that spoke Russian, and even the office work was conducted in Russian. Did you think that a small racist country on the Baltic coast was once a great state? We lived side by side with the Tatars for four thousand years. We fought, made friends, became related. They crushed the Romans, Crusaders, Ottomans, Poles, Frenchmen, Germans ... And now, our children open the textbook, and it drips from every page: enemies, enemies ... Legally, this is called inciting ethnic hatred. But in reality it is an ordinary information war. The war continues ...
The war against Russia has been going on for a very long time and very, very successfully. Of course, not on the battlefields, where we have always hit everyone and very painfully, but where the West has always won and continues to win - in information wars. The main goal is to prove to the inhabitants of our country that they are a stupid, brainless cattle, not even second-rate, but somewhere in the 6-7th category, without a past and future. And he has practically proved that even the authors of many patriotic articles agree with this approach completely and completely.
Examples? You are welcome!
The first capital, the city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC ...Example 1. We recently celebrated the 1000th anniversary of Russia. And when did it actually appear? The first capital (only the capital of a large country!), The city of Slovensk, was founded in 2409 BC (3099 from the creation of the world); source of information - the chronicle of the Servant Monastery on the Mologa River, the chronograph of Academician M. N. Tikhomirov, "Notes on Muscovy" by S. Herberstein, "The Legend of Slovenia and Ruse", which has a widespread circulation and was recorded by many ethnographers.
Since it is believed that Novgorod was built on the site of Slovensk, I pestered the leading archaeologists, as far as it is plausible. Literally, they answered me like this:
“And the hell knows. We have already got to the bottom of the Paleolithic sites there "
Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of lesser rank ...Example 2. It is believed that somewhere in the 8th century, wild, brainless and worthless Slavs, wandering herds through the forests, called the Viking Rurik to themselves and said: “Take over us, oh great European superman, otherwise we, idiots, are nothing can not". (Free presentation of a history textbook). In fact, Rurik is the grandson of the Novgorod prince Gostomysl, the son of his daughter Umila and one of the neighboring princes of lesser rank. He was called together with his brothers, since all 4 sons of Gostomysl died or perished in the wars. He was accepted by agreement with the elders, and worked hard to earn respect in Russia. Source: Joachim's Chronicle, Russian history according to Tatishchev, "Brockhaus and Efron", etc.
The opinion is widely spread that almost the only civilization of the past was the Roman Empire, an example of legality and morality. In general, that the gladiatorial battles of Rome, that the modern indulgence of marauders in Iraq - one field of berries. The morale of the Western world has not changed much, and it still causes disgust among "savages" like the Russians, Chinese and Dagestanis. Bare-footed and bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry ... Official history: the great, beautiful and mighty Roman civilization fell under the blows of stinking shaggy savages. In fact, the geeks, who were sick of everyone (like the Americans now), were sanitized by more decent neighbors. The bare-assed and bare-footed, poorly armed Roman infantry (open the textbook on the history of the ancient world, and admire the legionnaires) was worn down by cataphraktarii, clad in steel from tops to horse hooves.
For comparison: cataphracts and Roman legionaries.
The main source of information is “Cataphracts and their role in the history of military art” by A.M. Khazanov. (I don’t remember the rest, but those who wish can search the autosearch for themselves. There is a lot of material - they just don’t let it into schools. "Harmful").
The Cataphracts are the Slavs who defended themselves against the Europeans ... The most interesting thing is where did the Huns come from to "cleanse" Rome? Ob, Ugra, the Volga region, the Urals, the Azov region ... The tombs with partial armament of the cataphracts were also found in Dagestan. Have you, comrades patriots, looked at the map for a long time? So where did the Huns go to Rome from? Why was "wild Russia" in Europe called Gardarik - the Country of Cities? Now it doesn't matter, because we are celebrating 1000 years of Russia with joyful faces, we consider Rurik to be the master who came from Norway, who founded Russia, and even, it seems, are proud of such a story. 4 millennia were sent down the drain, impudently fucked, as if they were uninteresting - and not a single dog even whined. 1: 0 in favor of the West.
The second goal was against the Russian fools. In the 8th century, one of the Russian princes nailed a shield to the gates of Constantinople, and it is difficult to assert that Russia did not exist even then. Therefore, in the coming centuries, long-term slavery was planned for Russia. The invasion of the Mongol-Tatars and 3 centuries of obedience and humility. What marks this era in reality? We will not deny the Mongol yoke out of laziness, but ... As soon as it became known in Russia about the existence of the Golden Horde, young guys immediately went there to ... rob the Mongols who came from rich China to Russia. The Russian raids of the 14th century are best described (if anyone has forgotten, the period from the 14th to the 15th century is considered a yoke.
In 1360, Novgorod lads fought along the Volga to the Kamsky mouth, and then took by storm the large Tatar city of Zhukotin (Dzhuketau near the modern city of Chistopol). Having seized untold riches, the ushkuiniks returned back and began to "drink zipuns" in the city of Kostroma. From 1360 to 1375, the Russians made eight major campaigns on the middle Volga, not counting small raids. In 1374, the Novgorodians took the town of Bolgar (not far from Kazan) for the third time, then went down and took Sarai itself - the capital of the Great Khan.
In 1375, the Smolensk guys in seventy boats under the command of governors Prokop and Smolyanin moved down the Volga. By tradition, they made a "visit" to the cities of Bolgar and Saray. Moreover, the rulers of the Bolgar, taught by bitter experience, paid off with a large tribute, but the khan's capital Sarai was taken by storm and plundered. In 1392, the ushkuyniks again took Zhukotin and Kazan. In 1409, voivode Anfal led 250 ushkues to the Volga and Kama. And in general, to beat the Tatars, in Russia, was considered not a feat, but a trade.
During the Tatar "yoke" Russians went to the Tatars every 2-3 years, Sarai was fired dozens of times, and hundreds of Tatars were sold to Europe. What did the Tatars do in response? We wrote complaints! To Moscow, to Novgorod. The complaints persisted. The “enslavers” could not do anything else. The source of information on the mentioned campaigns - you will laugh, but this is a monograph by the Tatar historian Alfred Khasanovich Khalikov.
They still cannot forgive us for these visits! And at school they still tell how Russian gray-footed men cried and gave their girls into slavery - because they were submissive cattle. And you, their descendants, also penetrate this thought. Do we have any doubts about the reality of the yoke? 2: 0 in favor of the West
Ivan the Terrible
In the 16th century, Ivan the Terrible came to power. During his reign in Russia:
Jury trial introduced;
- free primary education (church schools);
- medical quarantine at the borders;
- local elected self-government, instead of the governor;
- for the first time there was a regular army (and the world's first military uniform - at the archers);
- stopped Tatar raids;
- equality was established between all strata of the population (do you know that serfdom did not exist in Russia at all at that time? The peasant was obliged to sit on the land until he paid for its rent, and nothing more. And his children were considered free from birth, in any case!).
- slave labor is prohibited (source - Ivan the Terrible's code of law);
- the state monopoly on the fur trade, introduced by Grozny, was canceled only 10 (ten!) years ago.
- the territory of the country has been increased 30 times!
- the emigration of the population from Europe exceeded 30,000 families (those who settled along the Zasechnaya line were paid a lifting 5 rubles per family. Expense books were preserved).
- the growth of the well-being of the population (and taxes paid) during the reign amounted to several thousand (!) percent.
- for the entire time of the reign there was not a single person executed without trial and investigation, the total number of "repressed" ranged from three to four thousand. (And the times were dashing - remember St. Bartholomew's night).
Now, remember what you were told about Grozny at school? That he was a bloody tyrant and lost the Livonian War, while Russia was shaking in horror? 3: 0 in favor of the West.
By the way, about the Americans who are stupid as a result of propaganda. Already in the 16th century, many brochures were published in Europe for every mindless man in the street. There it was written that the Russian tsar was a drunkard and a debaucher, and all his subjects were the same wild freaks. And in the instructions to the ambassadors it was indicated that the tsar is a teetotaler, unpleasantly clever, categorically cannot bear drunkenness, and even forbade drinking alcohol in Moscow, as a result of which one can only get drunk outside the city, in the so-called "liqueurs" (the place where they pour) ... Source - study "Ivan the Terrible" by Kazimir Walishevsky, France. Now guess three times - which of the two versions is set out in the textbooks?
In general, our textbooks proceed from the principle that everything that is said about the Russia of the abominable is true. Anything that is said good or intelligible is a lie.
One example. In 1569 Grozny came to Novgorod, which had approximately 40,000 inhabitants. There was an epidemic raging, and it smelled of riot. According to the results of the sovereign's stay, the memorial lists fully preserved in the synodiks mark 2800 dead. But Jerome Horsey in his "Notes on Russia" indicates that the guardsmen massacred 700,000 (seven hundred thousand (!?)) People in Novgorod.
Guess which of the two numbers is considered historically accurate? 4: 0 in favor of the West.
The Ottoman Empire, by this time, was actively expanding in all directions, conquering all the Mediterranean lands, stretching out from Iran (Persia) and advancing on Europe, approaching Venice and laying siege to Vienna. In 1572, the Sultan decided to conquer at the same time the wild, as European brochures assured, Muscovy. 120 thousand troops moved from the Crimea to the north, supported by 20 thousand janissaries and 200 cannons.
This is the place near the village of Molody ... Prince Mikhailo Vorotynsky ... Near the village of Molody, the Ottomans encountered the 50-thousandth detachment of Voivode Mikhail Vorotynsky. And the Turkish army was ... No, it was not stopped - it was completely cut out !!!
From that moment on, the Ottoman offensive on the neighbors stopped - but try to engage in conquests if your army was almost halved! God forbid you to fight off the neighbors yourself. What do you know about this battle? Nothing? That's it! Wait, in 20 years about the participation of Russians in the Second World War, they will also start to "forget" in textbooks. After all, all "progressive humanity" has long and firmly known - Hitler was defeated by the Americans. And it is time to correct the Russian textbooks "wrong" in this area.
Information about
can be generally classified as closed. God forbid, the Russian cattle will learn that they can be proud of the deeds of their ancestors in the Middle Ages! He will develop a wrong self-awareness, love for the Fatherland, for her deeds. And this is wrong. So, it is difficult to find data about the Battle of Moldodya, but it is possible - in specialized reference books. For example, in the "Encyclopedia of Armaments" of the KiM three lines are written.
So, 5: 0 in favor of the West.
Stupid Russian bums. Remembering the Mongol invasion, I am always amazed - where did they manage to collect so many sabers? After all, sabers were forged only since the 14th century, and only in Moscow and Dagestan, in Kubachi. Such is the strange fork - forever we and the Dagestanis suddenly turn out to be the same. Although, in all the textbooks between us there are always a couple of hostile states. Nowhere else in the world has they learned how to forge - this is a much more complex art than it might seem
But progress was coming, the 17th century. The saber gave way to other weapons. Before the birth of Peter 1, there was very little left. What was Russia like? If you believe the textbooks, approximately the same as in Tolstoy's novel "Peter the First" - patriarchal, ignorant, wild, drunk, inert ...
Did you know that it was Russia that armed all of Europe with advanced weapons? Every year Russian monasteries and foundries sold hundreds of cannons, thousands of muskets, and edged weapons there. Source - here's a quote from the "Encyclopedia of Arms":
Cast iron cannon. These were sold to wild Europeans ...
“It is interesting that the manufacturers of artillery pieces in the 16th-17th centuries were not only the sovereign's cannons, but also monasteries. For example, a fairly large production of cannons was carried out in the Solovetsky Monastery and in the Kirillovo-Belozersky Monastery. Owned guns and very successfully used the Don and Zaporozhye Cossacks. The first mention of the use of guns by the Zaporozhye Cossacks dates back to 1516. In the XIX-XX centuries, in Russia and abroad, the opinion was formed that the pre-Petrine artillery was technically backward. But here are the facts: in 1646 the Tula-Kamensk factories supplied the Netherlands with more than 600 guns, and in 1647 360 guns of 4,6 and 8 pounds. In 1675, the Tula-Kamensk factories shipped abroad 116 cast iron cannons, 43892 balls, 2934 grenades, 2356 musket barrels, 2700 swords and 9687 pounds of iron. "
So much for the wild, backward Russia, which they talk about at school.
6: 0 in favor of the West.
By the way, from time to time, I come across Russophobes who argue that all of the above cannot be, since even highly progressive and developed England and France learned to cast iron only in the 19th century. In such cases, I argue for a bottle of cognac and take a person to the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. One of the cast-iron cannons, cast in 1600, lies cheekily there on a stand for all to see. I have already accumulated 3 bottles of cognac in my bar, but they still don’t believe me. People do not believe that Russia, throughout its history and in all respects, was ahead of Europe by about two centuries. But ...
And now everyone around has the historical right of Russians to kill, rob, and rape. To kill a Russian person is not banditry, but a desire for freedom. And the lot of all Russians is to repent, repent and repent.
The information war against Russia has been going on for many centuries ... A little more than a hundred years of information war - and a sense of our own inferiority has already been sown in all of us. We are more, like our ancestors, not sure of our own righteousness. Look what is happening with our politicians: they are constantly making excuses. No one is demanding that Lord Jad be brought to justice for propaganda of terrorism and cooperation with bandits - he is persuaded that he is not quite right.
We threaten Georgia - and we do not carry out threats. Denmark spits in our face - and they don't even impose sanctions against it. The Baltic states have established an apartheid regime - politicians shyly turn away. People demand to allow the sale of weapons for self-defense - they are openly called worthless cretins who, out of stupidity, will immediately interrupt each other.
Why should Russia make excuses? After all, she is always right! Nobody else dares to say this.
You think - it's just that today's politicians are so indecisive, but instead of them, just about, others will come. But this will never happen. Because the feeling of inferiority does not come from the post of foreign minister. It begins to be systematically brought up from childhood, when the child is told: our grandfathers were very stupid, stupid people, incapable of making the most elementary decisions. But a kind and smart uncle Rurik came to them from Europe, began to own and teach them. He created the state of Russia for them, in which we live.
The poison, drop by drop, pours into the soul, and when a person leaves school, he already gets used to looking at the West as a kind master, smarter and more developed. And at the words "democracy" begins to reflexively stand on its hind legs.
What the Western world is best at is waging an information war. The blow was struck in the place that no one had thought to defend - according to the educational program. And the West won. It remains to show a little patience - and our children themselves will crawl on their knees in that direction and ask the lowest permission to lick the owners' shoes. Already crawling - a couple of days ago I managed to see a piece of the program "Why does Russia need its own currency?" Correctly. Then there will be: "Why do we need an army?" Then: "Why is statehood needed?"
The West has won. The consignment.
What to do?
If you do not want children to be made slaves, you should not shout that we will fight when the hour comes, but save them right now. The hour has come, the war is almost over for the overwhelming advantage of the enemy. There is an urgent need to break the course of teaching history, changing the emphasis of teaching to a positive one. My girls are still 4 and 5 years old, but when they go to school, I foresee some hard days. Lawsuits for poor quality teaching are guaranteed. If the historian does not teach children about who such an important person in history as Rurik was or does not know about the Molodin battle, then he must pay fines out of his own pocket.
Better yet, file a lawsuit against the Ministry of Education for the dissemination of deliberately false information. Hire a good lawyer and it hurts and hurts to kick them - let them itch. But I don’t have one money for the “good” one. Poorly to throw off in the name of saving the honest name of the ancestors?
The second way to at least slightly strengthen the position on the fronts of the information war is to demand from the procurators the initiation of a criminal case on the fact of inciting ethnic hatred by teaching false historical information. There are a lot of examples. Let us recall the Tatar yoke. We are told that the Tatars oppressed the Russians, but they do not say that the Russians robbed the Tatars no less famously. As a result, Russians have racial resentment towards fellow citizens. Moreover, the insult is wrong. We are all good and behaved exactly the same.
Or, for example, in Kazan they celebrated (or tried to celebrate) the day of memory of the Tatars who defended the city from Russian troops. There is a clear confrontation on a national basis. Although, in fact, the city was taken not by Russians, but by Russian-Tatar (!) Troops. Shig-Alei's cavalry provided cover for the streltsy detachments - and if he is a German, then I am ready to recognize myself as Pope. The Russian-Tatar troops took Kazan, eliminating the influence of Istanbul on the Volga, and protecting civilians from predatory raids, liberated tens of thousands of slaves. It is enough to recognize the participation of the Tatars in this noble cause - and the national question loses its acuteness.
But I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t know how to roll out a statement in such a way that it’s not brushed off and sent to hell.
Allen Dulles and other puppets from their theater of the absurd ... By the way, Dallas's plan to incite ethnic hatred was mentioned here more than once. And no one paid attention to how it is being implemented. Also at school. Good teachers diligently sow discord between the largest ethnic groups - Russians and Tatars. The entire course of history is filled with pearls about how the Tatars attacked, how the Russians attacked the Tatars, etc. But nowhere is it indicated that the Tatars are our symbiote, our companion people. Tatar units have always been part of the Russian troops, participated in all Russian wars - both internecine and in battles with an external enemy. We can say that the Tatars are just Russian light cavalry. Or Russians - Tatar forged men. The Tatars fought against Mamai on the Kulikovo field together with the Moscow army, the Tatars were the first to attack the enemy in the Swedish and Livonian wars; in 1410, near Grunwald, the combined Polish-Russian-Tatar army utterly defeated the crusaders, breaking the back of the Teutonic Order - moreover, it was the Tatars who took the first blow.
What to do? To enlighten and awaken from the sleep of reason ... Sometimes I am asked why I do not mention the Lithuanians. So I mention - Russians. The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was a Russian state, with a Russian population that spoke Russian, and even the office work was conducted in Russian. Did you think that a small racist country on the Baltic coast was once a great state?
7: 0 in favor of the West.
We lived side by side with the Tatars for four thousand years. We fought, made friends, became related. They crushed the Romans, crusaders, Ottomans, Poles, Frenchmen, Germans ... And now, our children open the textbook, and it drips from every page: enemies, enemies, enemies ... Legally, this is called inciting ethnic hatred. But in reality it is an ordinary information war.
The war continues ...
Alexander Prozorov
