Is everything in the world relative.
Butterflies, of course, know nothing about snakes. But birds that hunt butterflies know about them. Birds that do not recognize snakes more often become ...
An octave is the interval between the two nearest sounds of the same name: before and before, re and re, etc. From the point of view of physics, the "kinship" of these ...
In the year 27 BC e. the Roman emperor Octavian received the title Augustus, which means “sacred” in Latin (in honor of the same figure, by the way, ...
A famous joke says: “NASA spent several million dollars to develop a special pen that can write in space ....
About 10 million organic (i.e., carbon-based) and only about 100 thousand inorganic molecules are known. In addition...
Unlike ordinary glass, quartz transmits ultraviolet light. In quartz lamps, the source of ultraviolet light is a gas discharge in mercury vapor. Is he...
With a large temperature difference inside the cloud, powerful updrafts arise. Thanks to them, the drops can stay in the air for a long time and ...
To the question, A. Einstein said: Everything is relative, M. Plank corrected: And the relative is relative ... So what happens is Absolute? set by the author Evgeniy ########## the best answer is I quote the lines of Bernard Verber:
"Everything is in one (Abraham).
Everything is love (Jesus Christ).
Everything is sex (Sigmund Freud).
Everything is economics (Karl Marx).
Everything is relative (Albert Einstein).
So what is next? "
And then ... that's it, every time we ask such a question, it is absolute.))
Source: Hello, Eugene!
Answer from 22 answers[guru]
Hello! Here is a selection of topics with the answers to your question: A. Einstein said: Everything is relative, M. Plank corrected: And the relative is relative ... So what happens is Absolute?
Answer from European[guru]
Absolute zero is an absolute concept ..
Answer from Petitioner[guru]
The speed of light in a vacuum.
Answer from Apricot[guru]
in a world where everything is relative, there is no absolute.
God Himself is the Absolute.
i also think that nature itself is absolute, but man makes it relative.
Answer from Bee[guru]
Human idiocy))
Answer from Elena Vladimirovna[guru]
Yes, the speed of light is absolute. Einshane never said "everything is relative." He introduced an absolute constant in physics - the speed of light.
Answer from Cerdalik ??[guru]
Absolute relativity ... in development, cognition and determination ....
Answer from Ё OTHER[guru]
Max Planck, Albert Einstein ... The greatest minds.
I have no reason not to believe them.
Answer from Yury[guru]
When they say that EVERYTHING is relative, it follows from this that not all
relative, and relativity itself is then absolute, and if it is
absolute, then not everything is relative.
It’s better to consider that everything in the world is relative and absolutely
at the same time, depending on what relation we are considering
one phenomenon to another.
Answer from Yolnyshkova_Ya.[guru]
As an option, for everything EVERYTHING in question is EVERYTHING exists in the world through symmetry, and it is precisely the interaction of the antipodes that is the condition for the existence of everything.
This implies, firstly, that relative and absolute are a kind of antipodes, and secondly, that symmetry itself is an example of the absolute.
Answer from MARINA \u003d ballerina \u003d MARUSICHKA-OLD[guru]
I think - ZERO!
Answer from Atmanam viddhi[guru]
The question, of course, is interesting.))
First, with your permission, I will quote Wikipedia.))
Absolute - in religion and idealistic philosophy - God or the original cause of all phenomena, the unconditional perfect beginning of being, which lies at the heart of the world, free from any relations and conditions.
Naturally, this refers more to metaphysics than to physics.
But after all, it is just philosophy, not natural sciences, that is engaged in the search for answers to such questions.))
So it turns out that the Absolute is either an immutable Object, not limited by any framework and categories, like Shiva in the philosophy of advaita-vedanta, or just an abstract concept that operates with our consciousness.
Everything is relative in this world
(translated)
Wed Everything is relative in this world, and there is no such situation for a person worse than which nothing could have happened.
M. Gorky. Former people.
Wed Tout est relatif dans ce monde.
Russian thought and speech. Own and alien. The experience of Russian phraseology. Collection of figurative words and parables. T.T. 1-2. Walking and well-aimed words. A collection of Russian and foreign quotes, proverbs, sayings, proverbs and single words. SPb., Type. Ak. sciences.. M.I. Michelson. 1896-1912.
See what "everything is relative in this world" in other dictionaries:
Everything is relative on this light (translated). Wed Everything is relative in this light and not for a person of such a situation, which couldn’t be anything worse. M. Gorky. Formerly people. Wed Tout est relatif dans ce monde ...
The word relative in modern Russian is almost exclusively characteristic of the styles of the book language. It expresses such values: 1. Established or determined by comparison, comparison with another; absolute antonym. Relative Weight ... History of Words
- (Alexey Maksimovich Peshkov) (1868 1936) writer, literary critic and publicist Everything in Man is everything for Man! No people are pure white or completely black; people are all colorful. One, even if he is great, is still small. Everything is relative to ... Consolidated Encyclopedia of Aphorisms
Aya, oh; flax, flax, flax. 1. for what. out of date. Related to what l. Associated with what l. [Figner] was little versed in the sciences, even related to military affairs. D. Davydov, Letter to M. N. Zagoskin, March 6, 1830. Thanks to the work of our bibliographers and ... ... Small Academic Dictionary
See Everything Relative to This World ... Michelson's Big Dictionary of Explanations (original spelling)
- - was born on May 26, 1799 in Moscow, on Deutsche Street in the house of Skvortsov; He died on January 29, 1837 in St. Petersburg. On the part of his father, Pushkin belonged to an old noble family, descending, according to family trees, from a native of "... ...
Xiii. Internal affairs (1866-1871). On April 4, 1866, at four in the afternoon, Emperor Alexander, after a usual walk in the Summer Garden, got into the carriage when an unknown person shot him with a pistol. At that moment, standing in ... ... Big biographical encyclopedia
A LIFE - Jesus Christ the Savior and the Life Giver. Icon. 1394 (Art Gallery, Skopje) Jesus Christ the Savior and Life Giver. Icon. 1394 (Art Gallery, Skopje) [Greek βίος, ζωή; lat vita], christ. theology in the doctrine of J. ... ... Orthodox Encyclopedia
The lizards, which we consider to be the females of the entire detachment, are beautifully built animals with fully developed limbs. They are distinguished by a valky elongated body, clearly separated from the neck by the head, very ... ... Animal life
Otherwise, phytogeography and geobotany (Grisebach in 1866). Branch of Botany and Geography. From the point of view of the first, the causes and laws of the distribution and distribution of plants on the earth's surface are studied - this is geographical botany. From point of view… … Encyclopedic Dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron
Books
- Human psychology in an airplane, Z. Geratevol. This book will be made according to your order using Print-on-Demand technology. The book discusses the problems of pilot psychology in the light of the development of aviation, the processes of perception and ...
- You are darkness, I am light, Natalia Pivskaya. This story is about Light and Darkness, about Good and Evil. Or maybe that as such there is no Good and no Evil. After all, everything in this world is relative. Rita falls into the mysterious and unknown city of Montriel, about ...
- 7 secrets of a happy woman. 100 secrets of happy love: for all ages, for all times. Secrets of a happy relationship (number of volumes: 3), Sheremetyev Konstantin Petrovich. The following books are included. "100 secrets of happy love: for all ages, for all times." There is no person in the world who would not dream of happy love. But how to find your ...
Alexey Chulichkov
I recall an old joke about a man crawling at night under a lantern in search of a lost wallet, and the question of where he dropped it, waving his hand in the dark. Laughter provokes the victim’s explanation: “I am looking for him here because it is brighter here!”
Despite such repeatedly ridiculed behavior, we still very rarely dare to look where it is dark, although it is obvious that “in the light” we do not need. Not everyone dares to step into the darkness from the illuminated circle of understandable ideas, but without this there will be no discoveries ...
Among those who crossed this line is Albert Einstein. To someone, he appears in the form of a faddish “Albert Germanovich,” who only thanks to the prompting of a famous beer lover guesses that “E \u003d mc2”. The more enlightened ones know him as a great physicist who linked two familiar concepts into a single space-time and saw his curvature. But most seriously believe that the phrase "everything in the world is relative" belongs to him. And they calmly declare: “Well, since Einstein himself thinks so, that means, for sure. There is nothing absolute in the world. So, there are no ideals or moral values, and it all depends on what point of view to look at. "
And meanwhile, his theory no less deserves the name "Theory of Absolutes" ...
Until his worldwide fame, A. Einstein was known, to put it mildly, as an eccentric and a loser. He was kicked out of the gymnasium a year before its graduation. Having brilliantly passed the entrance exams to the Zurich Polytechnic, the then-famous European Center for Scientific Knowledge, it was accepted there only a year later due to the lack of a matriculation certificate. After his graduation, for two years he could not find a permanent job, and then he served in the patent office for several years as an “expert of the 3rd rank”. His unwillingness to “look where it is light” annoyed his colleagues, colleagues, and members of his family. But the darkness of uncertainty beckoned him, despite the need and even hunger that haunted him in the period after the Polytechnic.
The first article, containing the results of studies that were later called the theory of relativity, was published in 1905 in the leading physics journal of the time, “Annals of Physics”. Its author was 26 years old. The theory of relativity was born from the consideration of the paradox that physics encountered at the turn of the 19th – 20th centuries and was associated with the analysis of the propagation of light in the medium.
At first glance, the problem of movement does not seem very interesting to us, and it is even strange that many serious scientists have spent their time and energy studying it. Indeed, we all see around us a certain space in which bodies move or rest. But the trouble is that for different observers moving one relative to another, different objects will be motionless. For example, if we are traveling in a train, then the objects lying in the compartment are motionless for us, while they move for a person standing on the platform, past which the train sweeps. For most people in the everyday sense, what is not moving relative to the Earth is motionless. But what about a hypothetical observer on the sun? And in general, is it possible to find something “absolutely motionless” in the universe with which one could relate the movement of any object?
At one time, it seemed that the answer to this question was positive. On the basis of a number of experiments (in particular, based on observing the displacement of the apparent position of stars during the motion of the Earth), a hypothesis was formulated that light represents waves propagating in an “absolutely motionless” medium called ether. To understand the speed with which we rush into the still space occupied by the ether, the American physicist Albert Michelson, and later his compatriot Edward Morley, carried out very accurate experiments, which, to the greatest surprise of scientists, did not find the ether!
Scientists have put forward a series of witty explanations of the results of the experiments of Michelson and Morley. It became clear that our ideas about many familiar things, to put it mildly, are inaccurate. To understand the situation of physicists, we can say that the simplest and at the same time absurd for the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. the explanation of the experiments of Michelson and Morley was that the Earth is absolutely motionless! An attempt to save the “ether hypothesis” by the assumption that the Earth carries away a part of the ether that “stuck” to its surface turned out to be unsuccessful, since this assumption contradicted another series of experiments. Irish scientist George Fitzgerald suggested that the ether “presses” on bodies moving through it, causing them to contract, and calculations for bodies moving at the speed of light, led to the fact that their length in the direction of motion should be zero. The same explanation was even more generally proposed by the Dutchman Hendrik Lorenz; in particular, in his opinion, when moving through the “ether wind”, the clock slows down.
These explanations now remind us of attempts to “search where it is light”: they could not tear themselves away from the notions of the ether and were props for this hypothesis. Einstein dared to “step into the dark” and do what later became almost the norm for all physics of the 20th century: discard what contradicts the observations, and what remains to be considered physical reality, despite all the apparent absurdity.
Einstein rejected the existence of the ether, rejected the concept of absolute peace, the uniform time that flows everywhere and for everyone at the same pace, the concept of absolute size, which equally characterizes the length of an object for all observers. He rejected such an obvious rule of speed addition: for everyone who sailed a boat on a river, shot from a bow or walked on a racing carriage, it’s clear that the speed of the boat is the sum of the speed of the water and the speed of the boat relative to the water, etc. However, this was not the case for high speeds close to the speed of light. So, all the usual properties of movement and rest collapsed. And what in return?
First, Einstein introduced two main postulates. The first of them sounds more like a philosophical rather than a physical law: "There is no way to establish whether the body is at rest or in uniform motion." This postulate, in fact, argues that absolute peace does not exist. The second postulate is more physical: "Regardless of the movement of its source, light moves through empty space at the same speed." Its consequence is that the speed of light is the same for any observer in the universe.
And secondly, instead of the former, new absolutes appeared, not so obvious in everyday life, but the only ones that could create a consistent picture of the world. One of them was discussed in the previous paragraph - the speed of light is absolute! The second absolute links space and time together: if each event is described by four numbers - three spatial coordinates (x, y, z) and the fourth - time t of the event, then for any observer the space-time interval between two events is the same, the value of which is given by the formula
s \u003d (x2 + y2 + z2 – c2t2) 1/2, where c is the speed of light.
Many of the consequences of the above postulates are very exotic, it is difficult to accept them with ordinary consciousness (a lot of discussions, including those on the Internet by those who did not bother to study the theory of relativity sufficiently deeply, serve as confirmation of this). Nevertheless, not only experimental evidence confirms the fidelity of this theory, but also the principles of symmetry of nature that follow it, which are amazingly beautiful. For example, the theory of relativity claims that in a physical system all laws act regardless of whether it moves or rests. The theory claims the equal rights of all points of space and time, all directions in space, states a new physical reality - space-time with its symmetry, establishes the relationship between gravity and inertia, between mass and energy.
Many concepts that were previously considered independent and in no way related to each other, in the theory of relativity are presented as different facets of a single reality. Thanks to her, the world is now seen by us as much more “unified” than in classical physics, thereby reviving the ideas of ancient cultures on the universal interconnection of all things at a new level.
The original article is on the New Acropolis magazine website: www.newacropolis.ru
to the magazine "Man Without Borders"
On May 11, 1916, Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity was first introduced..
It is said that Albert Einstein - this ingenious mind of the 20th century, came up with his theory in the tram. It was there that he thought about the conclusions that various observers can draw when they are in different reference frames. Even such unshakable values \u200b\u200bas duration, time and distance will depend on the location in space and time occupied by the observer.
Traveling peacefully in the Bernese tram, the scientist came to the conclusion that if you accelerate the tram to near light speeds, the time in it will flow more slowly, and then completely stop.
Such an interesting theory required mathematical confirmation. Einstein had at his disposal hundreds of inexplicable facts, which at that time were accumulated by experimental physics. All of them required a scientific explanation. These effects were partially described by a special theory of relativity, developed and published by Einstein in 1905. The rigorous mathematical justification of the new theory came after eleven years of hard work, and the general was presented in wide scientific circles. The general theory of relativity looks much more complicated, and applies to all reference frames. GR makes the world amazing - to three familiar coordinates, it adds a fourth - time. The space-time continuum is curved under the influence of gravitational forces. All this was new and unusual for generations of scientists who perceived the world according to the laws of classical mechanics. But sound mathematical scientific calculations did their job, and all the leading physicists of the world accepted the theory.
Time after time, scientists confirm the validity of general relativity, and on its basis make new discoveries.
And recently, there are versions about the contribution of the first wife of Einstein Mileva Marich to the theory of relativity.
"Mileva Maric (1875 - 1948) was born in Titel, Vojvodina, in the north of ex-Yugoslavia. At the age of 21 she entered the Zurich Polytechnic, in the same year as Albert Einstein, who was three and a half years younger. She was the only student on the course. The Zurich Polytechnic was then something like the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, so Mileva had to be a very competent student, especially considering that she was a woman.Having met, Albert and Mileva fell in love.
In one of the letters to Mileva, Einstein wrote: "How happy and proud I will be when we finally achieve the successful completion of our work on the relative movement (Theory of Relativity - author's comment)." John Steichel notes in his book Einstein and Ether Drift experiments (1987): “This commentary makes us wonder at what kind of involvement Marich was in developing the theory.”
Mileva spent the winter semester of 1897-1898 in Heidelberg (Germany). In one of her letters to Einstein, she talked about the great interest that she was interested in reading materials on the ratio of the speed of movement of molecules and the distance between their collisions, a topic that became one of the fundamental aspects of Einstein's study of Brownian motion. Einstein admired Mileva’s calm independence and intellectual ambitions. He believed that he was very lucky when he met her: "A creature equal to me is just as strong and independent." Later, when Einstein worked on the electrodynamics of moving bodies, he repeatedly wrote to Mileva about the Theory of Relativity: "our work on relative motion." "our theory."
Mileva became pregnant. In 1902, her daughter Lieserl was born, about whom nothing is known. Maria Dokmanovich, translator of letters from Mileva, conducted an investigation, trying to find out the fate of Lieserl. Most likely, the girl was given for adoption a few weeks after birth, in 1902, in order to avoid the scandal associated with birth outside of marriage. In connection with these events, Mileva could not pass the diploma exam at the institute.
Albert and Mileva were married on January 6, 1903 (why not a few months earlier, so that there was no need to abandon their daughter?). In marriage, Mileva had two sons - Albert and Edward. Mileva completely subordinated her professional plans to the professional success of her husband, working as his assistant. This work did not give her the opportunity to complete her own graduation project, while Albert satisfactorily defended himself.
The biography of Mileva Marich Im Schatten Albert Einsteins: Das tragische Leben der Mileva Einstein-Maric (In the shadow of Albert Einstein: the tragic life of Mileva Einstein-Marich) says: "Russian physicist AF Ioffe, in his Memoirs of Albert Einstein" notes that the manuscripts of works published in 1905 were signed as “Einstein-Marich.” Joffe, being an assistant to V.K. Roentgen, had the opportunity to see manuscripts that were sent to him by the publisher Annalen der Physik for review, and which were subsequently lost. " Mileva was listed as a co-author in the original manuscript of an article on The Theory of Relativity in 1905.
In fact, Ioffe said of the manuscript: “Its author was Einstein-Marity” and added, believing that it was the name of Albert Einstein: “an unknown person from the Berne Patent Office”. Joffe did not know that by that time Mileva had changed the Serbian surname Marich to the Hungarian version of Mariti. Thus, Ioffe could argue that the manuscript was signed by Einstein-Marity only if he himself saw it, since Einstein did not speak out on this subject in any of his biographies.
After the publication of The Theory of Relativity, Einstein repeatedly demonstrated that his knowledge of experiments Michelson-Morley (the purpose of the experiments conducted from 1881 to 1887 by Michelson and Morley was to determine the speed of the Earth relative to the theoretical substance known as the luminiferous ether) and the works of H.A. Lorentz were quite limited. Meanwhile, knowledge of these works and experiments was fundamental and necessary to create the Theory of Relativity. There are no records of Einstein regarding these works, except for his letters to Mileva, as if this was an exclusively private topic for conversation with her. Einstein’s lack of familiarity with the experiments of Michelson-Morley and Lorenz makes it quite logical to assume that it was Mileva Marich who was an expert in this field, and that she supplied her husband with the necessary information, which means that she, like her husband, could be an author Theories of Relativity.
Christopher Bjerkness in the book "Albert Einstein - INCORPORABLE PLAGIATOR" (2002) says:
“It is clear that Albert Einstein was not the sole author of the 1905 manuscript on the“ relativities of relativity. ”His wife, Mileva Maric, could be a co-author or sole author of the work. Although the work was presented at the beginning either as a co-authorship of Mileva Einstein-Marity and Albert Einstein , or as the work of Mileva Einstein-Marity, Albert’s name became the only one under which the work was eventually published.
Mileva and Albert used to be co-authors in scientific works, and Albert then highly appreciated the cooperation of Mileva. Ms. Senta Trömel-Plötz presented extensive written sources that show both Albert’s shameless misappropriation of Mileva’s work and her silent submission. "
In letters to friends, Einstein boasted: "I treat my wife as a servant I cannot drive away." In a letter to Milev dated 1914, Einstein sets out to her his conditions for family life:
"1. You will ensure that
- my underwear and bedding was clean and kept in order
- I was served food three times a day in my office
- my bedroom and study were kept clean and tidy so that no one except me touched my desk
2. You will refuse any connection with me, except the one that must be maintained in public. In particular, you will not pretend that I
- stayed with you at home
- accompanied you on trips
3. You will have to solemnly promise that
- you will not wait on my part for any feelings and you will not reproach me for their absence
- you will answer me as soon as I turn to you
- unquestioningly leave both my bedroom and my office upon my first request
- You will not denigrate me in front of children, neither word nor deed "
(published at Le Monde on November 18, 1986)
By the time this letter was written, Einstein was already in connection with his cousin Elsa, who was younger than Mileva.
Mileva and Albert began to live separately from 1914, and divorced in 1919, when Albert married Elsa Einstein Lowenthal.
Mileva was awarded custody of the children. A clause was added to the divorce agreement that Einstein would pay Mileva the amount of any Nobel Prize that could be awarded to him in the future. This agreement was kept secret by Einstein for a long time. One can imagine how Mileva, fed up with lies and submission, says to her ex-husband: "Either you give the children and me money that you will receive as a bonus, but you will leave the glory for yourself, or I will tell everyone the truth."
After the divorce, Einstein completely stopped communicating with his son, Edward, a patient with schizophrenia. Mileva alone took care of him throughout her life. When she was near death, Einstein instructed the eldest of his sons, Albert, to write "his insane mother" that "she would not worry about anything. Including, about Edward." After the death of Mileva, Einstein put his youngest son in a psychiatric hospital, where he died. Father never visited him once.
The years spent in marriage with Mileva were Einstein's most fruitful years. After 1914, his physics became conservative, research on scientific literature stopped, and innovative ideas like the Theory of Relativity ran out. Researchers believe that creative ideas belonged to Mileva, and that when she disappeared from Einstein's life, his genius also disappeared. Physicist Evan Harris Lorent believes that Mileva was the author of the main points of the theory of relativity.
In 1987, Einstein's letters to Mileva were published. Most of them belonged to the last period of their relationship, many letters relating to the beginning of their relationship were destroyed by Einstein. In 13 of the 43 letters of Einstein to his wife, she speaks of her work or co-authored work. Einstein never explained how the idea of \u200b\u200bthe Theory of Relativity came to his mind: “The secret of creativity is the ability not to divulge your sources” (A. Einstein).
The consequences of the fact that a woman, rather than a man, may turn out to be a recognized author of the modern physical and mathematical concept of the structure of the universe, are significant. Einstein is an archetype of male genius. His image became a household name of an absent-minded scientist, too busy with his creative inner world, which should not be disturbed by his wife and children, completely unable to understand his transcendental task. We can imagine millions of women sacrificed for the triumph of their husbands. Researchers, artists, women philosophers, women authors of scientific and literary works, who first become co-authors, then helpers, and then even former wives, forgotten and deceived by the men to whom they dedicated their lives. How ridiculous it seems to us the stereotype of a man proud of his accomplishments, to whom his wife scratches equations from between dirty plates and diapers on a piece of paper, which he will subsequently flaunt before the world.
***
I want to dedicate this book to Mileva, all the Miles of the past, present and future, with the hope that they will discover new concepts of the universe and be recognized, loved and respected by their patrons.
I must admit that at one time I chose natural-scientific activity in order to understand the Theory of Relativity, perhaps in imitation of Einstein. Now I understand that in reality I would like to imitate Mileva, but Mileva another, future happy and equal world "
