Essay plan “The image of Khlestakov in the comedy “The Inspector General”. "The image of Khlestakov in the comedy "The Inspector General" - essay Work The Inspector General The Image of Khlestakov
Gogol's surnames are all telling; The surname "Khlestakov" is no exception. What does this surname hide, what does it tell readers first of all? The surname "Khlestakov" comes from the verb "to whip", i.e. to be dominant, to control someone. On the other hand, the character's frivolity is implied.
After the “poster” comes the article “characters and costumes (note to gentlemen actors)”. There our first impression is confirmed. Khlestakov is a young man, an official from St. Petersburg, somewhat stupid (without a king in his head), speaks and acts without any consideration, speech is abrupt, comes out of his mouth unexpectedly. All this must be confirmed in the play - one way or another.
The first time Khlestakov appears before us is in the second act and phenomenon. But even from the first act of the third phenomenon, important details about Khlestakov are learned, thanks, of course, to the two most gossipy people (Bobchinsky and Dobchinsky), and the details are as follows: an official from St. Petersburg (we already knew this), who goes to the Saratov province, behaves strangely (certifies): he lives in the tavern for another week, doesn’t intend to leave, takes everything into his account and doesn’t want to pay a penny. Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky, in turn, heard a lot about this from the innkeeper Vlas. Then both officials realized and gave Khlestakov as the Inspector to the mayor and his friends in the service.
FRAGMENT FROM THE PLAY.
CITYMAN (IN FEAR). What are you, God bless you, it’s not him.
DOBCHINSKY. He! and doesn’t pay money and doesn’t go. Who should it be if not him?...
Osip's monologue. It is here that we learn that Khlestakov is not an Inspector General; Moreover, a low-class official (registrar is a civil rank of the XIV class), poor in material terms (and not particularly rich in spiritual terms), plays cards, is not involved in business, i.e. does not work.
After a little time (the mayor was getting ready, driving), the mayor appears in the room in all his glory (in a hat scratched by a saber) (only Khlestakov was in the room). The mayor stood for a minute, and then a conversation began. Almost immediately, Khlestakov begins to complain about the living conditions in the local tavern, namely about the far from good quality of food. The mayor makes excuses, becomes timid, even trembles, and speaks to the side (characterizes the mayor as vile). In this dialogue, Khlestakov is quite brave and cheerful (this, it seems to me, happens because Khlestakov was hungry, because, in fact, he knew that he was talking to a person who had a higher rank); another detail: Khlestakov hinted at the minister, and this, of course, could not help but frighten the mayor; It is after this that the mayor gives up and begins to justify himself (although he had made excuses before, but not so ardently), complain about life, refutes the slander about the beating of a non-commissioned officer's wife... And in the end, the mayor does not find any other way out than offering material help Khlestakov. He, of course, is happy and takes the money. Everything is like a stone from the soul (the mayor thinks). Then the mayor dared, i.e. offered (somehow, embarrassed) to live at his place, which Khlestakov could not refuse. Afterwards, the mayor offers to visit charitable establishments, to which Khlestakov agrees, but the mayor, before going to charitable establishments with Khlestakov, writes a letter to his wife and daughter to prepare for the reception of the Inspector General (preparing for a drink).
Khlestakov appears again, but in the third act and fifth scene, together with a rather large company, in the mayor’s house. In the conversation we learn that Khlestakov was treated to excess in a charitable establishment, given a drink, and he was glad (he was hungry). He develops a desire to compose out of satiety (this can be seen with an inconspicuous eye from his conversation, in particular with Anna Andreevna and Marya Antonovna). He shows off in front of the ladies, claims that he is used to living in society, talks about life in St. Petersburg, how he was there with the head of the department on one leg, how famous he is there, that everyone knows him there, how soldiers once confused him with the commander-in-chief (how can - it is thin, like straw). He actively talks about aspects of literature, about creative life in this particular area: “... I am on the same page with Pushkin...”. Passes off other people's literary works as his own. And he has a house in St. Petersburg, and a watermelon on the table for seven hundred rubles... but I wanted to emphasize that he starts talking and it goes without the slightest attention (everyone is scared): "... How do you run up to the fourth floor..." Yes, those days, low-class officials lived on the fourth floor! The State Council is also afraid of him (hey, that’s enough!). Soon, at the end of the long story, Khlestakov goes to the side.
Afterwards, the mayor’s house is crowded with: Tyapkin-Lyapkin, Zemlyanika, the postmaster, Khlopov, Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky. The main purpose of the collection: “Whoever enters the room first and gives a bribe to the Auditor.” The first judge is approaching (according to Zemlyanika, every word the judge says, Cicero rolled off his tongue - a strong argument!), and he does a great job. In general, it doesn’t matter further (then the postmaster, Zemlyanika, who never gave any money, Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky). In the end, Khlestakov has more than a thousand rubles in his pocket.
Khlestakov writes a letter to Tryapichkin, so to speak, to brag about how he fooled all the officials, got a bunch of money, without doing anything special.
I skip the scene of “paying Khlestakov about everything”, we move on to another - a declaration of love to Marya Antonovna, Anna Andreevna, and, finally, a proposal of marriage to Marya. Both ladies had no idea that Khlestakov could not love strongly, for a long time, since (this is obvious) he rushes from one extreme to another.
After Khlestakov, he leaves and says that he will arrive soon - but we know that this is nonsense.
Soon after this, a feast takes place in the mayor's house; The mayor is especially happy because of the marriage of the so-called Inspector General to his daughter, Marya Antonovna. We are not interested in the details of the feast.
After some time, the postmaster runs in (with a printed letter) and reports that they have all been deceived, and soon reads out the letter. The officials learned a lot of interesting things about themselves.
THE CITY OFFICER IS STUPID LIKE A GRAY GELING;
THE POSTMASTER IS EXACTLY THE DEPARTMENTAL WATCHMEN MICHEEV, MUST BE ALSO A SCAWN, DRINKING BITTER;
OVERVIEW OF CHARITABLE ESTABLISHMENTS STRAWBERRY IS A PERFECT PIG IN A YARMULK;
THE RESIDENT OF THE SCHOOL WAS ROCKED THROUGH BY AN ONION;
JUDGE LYAPKIN-TYAPKIN IS BAD MAUVETON IN THE STRONGEST DEGREE.
CONCLUSION.
Khlestakov is “the most difficult character in the play.” He, having become the culprit of universal deception, did not deceive anyone. He successfully played the role of the Inspector General, not only without intending to play it, but without even realizing that he was playing it. Only in the middle of the fourth act does Khlestakov begin to have vague guesses in his head that he is being mistaken for a “state man.”
But it is precisely in unintentionality that Khlestakov’s “strength” lies... He provoked the entire cunning game of the mayor and officials not by cunning, but by sincerity.
Fear paved the way for deception. It’s interesting, but Khlestakov doesn’t have “to the side” remarks - what’s on his mind is on his tongue.
Khlestakov is sincere in all cases. He invents things with the same sincerity with which he previously told the truth - and again the officials are deceived. This time they accept as truth what was fiction.
The image of Khlestakov is inexhaustible, fraught with stunning surprises. Khlestakov is “brilliant” due to the exceptional ease and “unpreset” nature of his invention. Is this Khlestakov’s deceit? But we know that he is lying from the heart. Boastfulness? But he himself believes in what he says.
One inevitably comes to the conclusion that the most accurate and comprehensive definition will be made on behalf of the character himself - “Khlestakovism”
P.S.
The conclusion was written using an article in the book by Yu.V. Mann "The Poetics of Gogol".
The role of Khlestakov and the means of creating his image. Khlestakov is the central character of the comedy. The writer managed to portray a hero who contributes to the development of the action. This was Gogol's innovation, since, despite the fact that Khlestakov is neither a reasoning hero, nor a conscious deceiver, nor a hero of a love affair, his image motivates the development of the plot. Gogol finds a new impulse that contributes to this development. In his comedy, everything rests on a situation of self-deception, which becomes possible precisely thanks to such a hero.
The image of Khlestakov is the embodiment of ideal emptiness and ideal stupidity. We can say that it lacks its own content. He is a meaningless person without inner filling. Therefore, he can easily transform and play the roles that are imposed on him. Khlestakov is weaving an intrigue, but we see that he himself is not aware of this. He rejoices at the honors shown to him and does not even try to find out the reason for such a ceremonial reception; he does not suspect that he was mistaken for an auditor; he simply does what those around him suggest, and through his actions he further establishes himself in their eyes as an official from St. Petersburg.
Khlestakov does not so much consciously or deliberately deceive the heroes of the comedy as mislead them. At the first meeting with the mayor, he tries to intimidate him so as not to end up in prison, although he himself is no less frightened. In the house of the Governor, Khlestakov lies just as unintentionally; he strives to rise in the eyes of his listeners and therefore invents a dizzying career for himself from a minor official to a field marshal. In addition to the role of auditor, commander-in-chief, and head of the department, he also takes on the guise of a benefactor for the city, a writer, and even the fiancé of Marya Antonovna, the mayor’s daughter. He takes on one form or another in accordance with the situation in which he finds himself; and therefore we can say that he is practically invulnerable. It can be compared to a chameleon, which changes its color not for fun, but for survival.
A similar definition of its essence is reflected in Khlestakov’s comparison with water taking the shape of the vessel into which it was poured, which was accurately noted by Yu. Mann. Thanks to the sincerity and sincerity with which Khlestakov plays the roles imposed on him, he easily gets out of any situation that could catch him in a lie. Marya Antonovna recalls that “Yuri Miloslavsky” is the work of Mr. Zagoskin, while the newly appointed auditor claims that he is its author. What about Khlestakov? And on the fly he comes up with an excuse for this discrepancy, explaining this by the presence of two works with the same title. Khlestakov once again admits inaccuracy in his simple lie when, intoxicated by wine and his sudden success, he utters the line: “As you run up the stairs to your fourth floor, you only say to the cook: “On, Mavrushka, overcoat.” But officials do not notice this oversight and take it for a slip of the tongue. They encourage Khlestakov in his lies, thinking that by doing so they will recognize him. In their acceptance of the nonsense they have invented for the truth, and the truth for a lie, lies the most comic (and tragic) part of the work.
The portrait of Khlestakov is created by the author using the comment he gave at the beginning of the comedy in “Notes for Gentlemen Actors,” replicas of other characters and his own words. Thus, the following image appears before the reader: a young man of about twenty-three, “somewhat stupid and, as they say, without a king in his head, - one of those people who in the offices are called empty... His speech is abrupt, and the words fly out of his mouth completely suddenly". Even his servant Osip does not consider his master a worthwhile person, but sees in him just a simple “elistrate”. When the Mayor first sees this nondescript, short man in front of him, whom he “would crush with his fingernail,” he doubts that a real auditor is standing in front of him. But since, due to the hasty reasoning of the officials, they decided that an auditor had actually appeared in the city incognito, since Khlestakov is the only visitor so far, and he is behaving strangely, the Mayor and the rest of the officials do not pay attention to the discrepancy between his appearance and the position he “occupies.” . Thus, the image of Khlestakov is shown in detail in
background of city officials, which allows us to consider his personality also in comparison with other characters. His stupidity and emptiness are shown in comparison with the stupidity of officials, and it remains to be seen which of them loses in this comparison.
The image of Khlestakov created by Gogol contributes to the penetration of mirage intrigue into the comedy, the meaning of which lies in depicting the pursuit of officials by the mirage, in their wasting their strength. Thanks to the mirage intrigue, Khlestakov’s demonic essence is revealed. He, like the devil, takes on the form offered to him by the petitioner and creates the illusion of fulfilling the request. Also, something mystical can be seen in the unexpected appearance of Khlestakov and in his sudden departure - from nowhere to nowhere.
Khlestakov is a capacious and deep image that contains great human truth. The Khlestakovs have not yet disappeared, and it is not for nothing that his name has become a household name. Much has already been said about the fact that Khlestakov is essentially an empty person. But how much interesting and instructive we take away from his image and how deeply he makes us think about ourselves!..
N. V. Gogol’s comedy “The Inspector General” has long been widely circulated with quotes and sharp comparisons, as they very aptly reflect human nature. This work, which the great writer wrote in 1835, is still relevant today. Because it describes with the clearest accuracy the most diverse traits of human character, in particular its main character. A coward, a braggart, a self-confident person - this is a short image of Khlestakov. In the comedy “The Inspector General” these features are revealed richly and vividly.
Hoax of the century
This work begins with the fact that in one county town they are waiting for a very important person - an auditor who is going on an important inspection. And then a gentleman arrives, very modest and businesslike. The author paints a brief image of Khlestakov in the comedy “The Inspector General” with very positive colors. Ivan Vladimirovich, that’s the name of the newcomer, of a very “pleasant appearance.” It does not make a stunning impression and is not even remarkable in any way. But if you look closely at the hero, he is very worthy of attention.
The circumstances were such that Khlestakov was mistaken for an important person. And he, instead of immediately correcting the misunderstanding, instantly gets into character. This is where the most hidden qualities of his character appear.
The Loser and the Little Man
An ordinary ordinary person of that time - this is a brief image of Khlestakov in the comedy “The Inspector General,” which the author draws to us at the beginning. He lives in a world that is full of various temptations and enticements. But the Northern capital refuses to accept him into its ranks. After all, Khlestakov does not have a high enough position, but he does not shine with a special mind, does not possess any sparkling talents. He can safely be classified as one of the banal losers who came to conquer St. Petersburg. But the hero clearly overestimated his strength - both financial and moral. He is an ordinary little man in a big capital.
But here fate gives you such a chance - to demonstrate that you are an outstanding person. And Khlestakov enthusiastically rushes into
County nobility
What society does the main character fall into? This is an environment of small landed nobility, whose representatives are only concerned with emphasizing their importance and greatness. Each resident of the county town tries to highlight the shortcomings of the other in order to prove that he is the best. The characters in Gogol's The Inspector General are swaggering, sometimes stupid, but consider themselves to be the local aristocracy.
And so Khlestakov, an ordinary little clerk, finds himself in such a society, as the author writes about him - “neither this nor that.”
A reasonable question arises: why didn’t the main character immediately admit that he was not who they thought he was? But the author does not answer this question - maybe he just wanted to play at being an important person?
The brief image of Khlestakov in the comedy “The Inspector General” can be described as follows: he is a man who is too far from ideal, he is a player, he is a petty reveler. Khlestakov believes that comfort should dominate, and worldly pleasures should come first. He sees nothing wrong with fooling scammers. Moreover, he is sure that he is doing a “holy work.”
Gogol created a wonderful image of a braggart and a coward who does not strive for anything and simply wastes his life. He is “one of those people who are called empty-headed in the offices.”
By the way, Khlestakov’s quotes from “The Inspector General” very aptly and vividly characterize a certain circle of people. The exact characteristics given to the heroes in a few words quite accurately reflect their inner essence.
It is interesting that, in addition to the real person, there is a certain ghost in the hero who takes revenge on him with fantastic self-affirmation. He tries his best to not be who he really is, but it desperately fails. But even Khlestakov’s own lackey openly despises the master. This is how he speaks of his master: “It would be nice if there was really something worthwhile, otherwise he’s just a simple little elistrat.”
Both a braggart and a scoundrel
Khlestakov has a good pedigree. He was born into the family of an old-world landowner, in the outback of Russia. But for some reason he was unable to maintain connections with his family, people, or land. He does not remember his kinship and from this he becomes, as it were, an artificial person who jumped out of the “Petrine table of ranks.” He speaks quite disparagingly about his father: “They, the idiots, don’t even know what it means to ‘order to accept’.” Such quotes from Khlestakov from “The Inspector General” once again emphasize that the hero does not honor, and even tries to make fun of, his old father.
But this does not prevent him from taking money from his “uneducated father” and spending it at his own discretion.
Narcissistic, gambling, boastful - this is a short image of Khlestakov in the comedy “The Inspector General”. He arrived at the hotel and immediately demanded the most delicious lunch, because he was allegedly not used to anything else. He loses all his money, but cannot stop. He insults the servant and yells at him, but at some points he warmly listens to his advice.
And what a lot of boasting! Without blinking an eye, he declares that he has an excellent command of the pen, and he personally wrote such famous works as “Robert the Devil” and “Fenella” in one evening. He doesn’t even suspect that these are not books, but operas!
And even when the mayor’s daughter catches him in a lie and remembers the real author of the work - “Yuri Miloslavsky”, Khlestakov immediately declares that he has exactly the same composition.
One can only envy such an ability to instantly adapt and not get discouraged! To impress ordinary people, he constantly spouts French words, which he knows only a few. It seems to him that this makes his speech secular, but in fact his flow of words causes laughter. He does not know how to finish his thought, so he quickly changes topics, jumping from one to another. When he needs something, he can be affectionate and polite. But as soon as Khlestakov gets his way, he immediately begins to be rude and rude.
There is no morality, there is only profit
There are no moral restrictions for Khlestakov. He is an empty and frivolous person who is concerned only with his own well-being. And when officials come to him to give him a basic bribe, he takes it for granted. At first, when they give money for the first time, he is unusually embarrassed and even drops it out of excitement. But when the postmaster comes in, Khlestakov accepts the money more confidently. At Strawberry's, he simply demands them with vigor. For now, he is confident in his soul that he is borrowing these funds and will certainly pay them back. But as soon as he realizes that he has been confused with an important person, Khlestakov instantly adapts to the situation and decides to take advantage of such a great chance.
The place of comedy in world literature
Gogol, “The Inspector General”, Khlestakov - these words have firmly entered world literature. The concept of “Khlestakovism” has become a common symbol of deception, trickery and narrow-mindedness.
The author managed to so accurately reflect the character of the main character in his work that deceitful and vicious people are still very often called in one word - Khlestakov. A rogue and a rogue, he never drew any conclusions from his situation, remaining in the vile confidence that next time he would certainly be lucky.
The most, in my opinion, comical and even a little stupid hero of Gogol’s comedy “The Inspector General” is Ivan Aleksandrovich Khlestakov.
The author says that Khlestakov looks twenty-three years old, he is thin and “without a king in his head,” as the reader will be convinced of throughout the comedy. On the way from St. Petersburg to his native Saratov, Khlestakov loses all his money, so he stops in the province of N, where all the events of the comedy unfold.
Local officials and merchants perceive Khlestakov as a strict inspector; they formed an opinion about him even before their personal communication; this is one of the main moments of the comedy, because if people themselves have invented the ruler of their destinies, then it will be very difficult to convince them, even if they behave so stupid and tactless as Khlestakov behaved.
Due to the fact that everyone perceives Ivan Aleksandrovich as the judge of their future, people simply do not notice that his habits, speech and the stories that he tells about himself are at odds with reality. And even if they do notice, it’s not a beam in their eye, but a small speck of dust. An example of this is the conversation of the Governor, who, after Khlestakov’s boasting about his position in St. Petersburg and his short communication with the emperor himself, says that even if half of what Khlestakov said is true, then this is already a collapse, because such a respected person saw everything the shortcomings of the city governed by the Mayor.
Khlestakov, being a man of not the most honest breed, takes advantage of the moment and gets the maximum benefit from the current situation. Although he has no idea that he is perceived as an auditor who can put everyone in prison, he understands that his position among these stupid residents seems very high to them, his connections in St. Petersburg are extremely powerful, so he uses the power that he has : allegedly borrows money from all officials, which he will never return, although he promises; eats plenty wherever possible; accepts payment for himself at a hotel, where he has debts for two weeks of accommodation and food.
He listens to all the merchants’ complaints about his Governor, promises to look into it and, of course, punish the culprit. He takes money from the workers for this, listens to the problems of two women, but in the end he simply forgets everything he heard, because it doesn’t matter to him.
He is greedy for women and tries to achieve success with both the Mayor’s daughter and his wife. Even at this already absurd moment, no one realizes what Khlestakov is, and when they understand, it’s too late.
Essay about Khlestakov
Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General" was written a long time ago, but it is still relevant today. And there are many reasons for this. The magnificent style that distinguishes every work of Nikolai Vasilyevich, the subtle, almost jewel-like irony that few will not make a smile, topical social problems that have made more than one generation of readers think, and, of course, the heroes: bright, original, very recognizable. One of these characters is the main character of Gogol’s immortal comedy “The Inspector General,” a swindler and rogue named Khlestakov. This is an arrogant and self-confident young man who knows human psychology well and knows how to take advantage of human weaknesses to achieve success in his plans.
One of the main character traits of Khlestakov is that this impudent young man believes that for some reason everyone should please him in every possible way and help him. That is why he willingly accepts bribes and gifts from others and happily begins to play the role of an imaginary auditor. Khlestakov loves when they pay a lot of attention to him, when they bow to him and fawn on him. He likes to feel omnipotent, although in reality he is absolutely nothing.
Khlestakov is one of those people who are used to taking everything from life. When he is mistaken for an auditor, he revels in his power and impunity, without thinking at all about the future, about where this one-man show will lead him. This person has no moral and ethical principles; he is used to living by the principle “after me, no grass will grow.” Khlestakov considers himself the king of life, and the rest - pathetic, absolutely worthless people. But then life puts everything in its place, at the end of the performance, when the real auditor arrives.
In his comedy, Gogol meant that Khlestakov’s traits live in many people contemporary to him, and it is no coincidence that he chose the Russian folk proverb “There is no need to blame the mirror if your face is crooked” as the epigraph to the work. By this he wanted to tell readers not to be offended if they inadvertently find their own traits in the image of Khlestakov.
Khlestakov is just a minor official, but, nevertheless, he is sure that all the best in life should go to him. He simply does not notice other people, is indifferent to their needs and desires. Other people for him are just pawns with the help of which he carries out his plans. Gogol also portrays Khlestakov as a good psychologist: He easily gains trust in a variety of people, finds a common language with people, uses people’s weaknesses in order to profit from them. Gogol portrays him as completely unprincipled and callous, deaf to the feelings and experiences of other people.
Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General" is still relevant due to the fact that in it Gogol paints very bright types of human characters, in particular, vivid images of the arrogant swindler Khlestakov and cowardly people who are afraid of the auditor and in every possible way curry favor with him, losing their own dignity. But the image of Khlestakov is painted most clearly. Khlestakov is an arrogant, self-confident swindler who is confident that his fraud will go unpunished, and does not care about the people around him. Such people have existed at all times, they existed in the time of Gogol, and they still exist now. And they will.
Characteristics of Khlestakov in Gogol's comedy The Inspector General
One of the main characters in Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General" is Khlestakov. Gogol specifically chose this surname for him. The root of the word is to whip, to whip after someone. An inconspicuous, thin man, twenty-three years old. A petty official, a gambler, lost all his money along the way and is now sitting in a hotel in a provincial town, hungry. That's why he looks into everyone's plates. He wants to eat, but the mayor takes him for an auditor.
Likes to dream and likes to lie a little about himself. And he enjoys it. It’s as if everyone was paying attention to him and even mistook him for an important general.
His lies are like the lies of a child, he himself believes in them. Wishful thinking. Residents of the city unwittingly help him in this - they believe all his stories. No one, including the mayor, bothered to check him and look at his documents. Everyone was waiting for the auditor, afraid of his inspection, but here the newcomer does not pay money and sticks his nose everywhere. Why not an auditor? Therefore, no one paid attention to some inconsistency of facts in his speeches. Where has it been seen that ambassadors of foreign powers play cards with the first person they meet? And a person who did not have any military rank was promised to be awarded the highest military rank of field marshal.
Khlestakov managed to deceive even the mayor, who boasts that during the thirty years of his service he has been deceiving people. He still didn’t understand who he was confused with. If I had been a little smarter, I would have benefited from the current situation. As it was, he just wanted to eat and borrow some money to move on. After all, he did not plan to stay in this city for a long time. He never plans anything at all, does not live by reason, but takes advantage of the current situation.
Khlestakov is a man without moral principles, stupid, lazy. He prefers not to work, but to spend time at the card table. He borrows money from people, knowing in advance that he will not pay it back. He deceives two women at once - the mayor's wife and daughter. The daughter is attracted by the prospect of marrying a man from the capital. He doesn’t feel sorry for anyone and doesn’t see anyone except himself, he’s a cynic and an egoist.
In the person of Khlestakov, Gogol shows how one can be deceived by a person who only wants to appear to be what he really is not.
Essay 4
Gogol’s work “The Inspector General” is an excellent example of Russian phantasmagoria and humor within the framework of literary prose and work. This work differs from the rest of his creations in that it has its own unique atmosphere and identity, again, within the framework of his creativity, and his vision of problems and their solutions. The work is also unique in its special style of narration and style, although these are more technical aspects of the work. One way or another, the work is a wonderful example of Gogol’s literary genius. This work is “The Inspector General”.
The work tells the story of a very cunning and talented swindler Khlestakov, who, thanks to his knowledge of human psychology and his assertiveness, and partly, self-confidence, gets everything he needs. Also in the work there are many different aspects that I would like to discuss, but for now we will only discuss the image and character of the swindler Khlestakov.
Khlestakov is essentially a person who does not care about the state of his surroundings, because he can always find benefit for himself from any situation. He doesn't care about anything other than his safety and his well-being, which is why the reader sometimes has conflicting feelings about this image. He is a hidden person who does not have, or at least does not show them, real friends. He only pretends that his supposed friends are important to him, but in reality he is thinking through how he can squeeze benefits out of them for his loved one. That's just the way he is and there's nothing he can do about it. He also tries to deceive as many people as possible, most likely to improve his skills.
It was Gogol’s image of Khlestakov that turned out to be the most vivid and powerful, which, undoubtedly, should be remembered by the reader, at least for his bitingness and self-confidence. I believe that this is exactly what the author tried to focus on when he wrote the work, because this is what helps the reader remember the image, and keep it in his head, comprehending and, scrolling through everything, and, accordingly, return to this work again. This is my subjective opinion, and therefore, it cannot be regarded as objective.
Several interesting essays
- Essay What does the conflict between fathers and children lead to? Grade 11
Harmony in the family is possible only in the absence of conflict between fathers and children. It would seem that people who love and are close to each other can argue about, but how often does a daughter disagree with her mother?
- Analysis of the story Poor People by Tolstoy (works)
In the work “Poor People,” Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy shows that a person, even in the most difficult life situation, remains kind and has compassion for other people.
- My favorite poem by Pushkin Winter morning essay
There is not a single writer in Russian poetry who would not be interested in winter themes. My attitude to the poem by the great genius A. S. Pushkin “Winter Morning”
- Review of the book Woe from Wit by Griboyedov
One day the whole family went on vacation. The weather was wonderful, it was warm and the sun was shining very brightly. When we were on the bus, I kept looking out the window, afraid of missing something interesting.
Ivan Khlestakov is one of the main characters of Gogol's comedy. Thanks to his image, the author was able to show us life in a past era, when in the country a person is judged not by his qualities and services to the Fatherland, but by his position. Now we will try to describe in the image of Khlestakov, the main character, who became a creative success for the writer.
Ivan Khlestakov is a contradictory and ambiguous hero, whose image turned out to be very successful and accurate. On the one hand, it is difficult to call Khlestakov a fraudster, because he is not specifically called an auditor, but only took advantage of the opportunity. But on the other hand, an honest person would never do this and would immediately refute the erroneous opinion. But no, because of a mistake by the highest district authorities, because of local cowardly swindlers and thieves, a vile nature was released, which immediately ran rampant. Moreover, the excitement also ran rampant. Therefore, the hero is completely immersed in the role assigned to him. Another prudent person in his place would have received a benefit and left immediately, especially if they began to suspect him of deception, but this is not about Khlestakov, who was gambling throughout his life and played until the last, squandering all his fortune.
How does the image of Khlestakov appear before us?
The author describes him as a petty person, an insignificant low-ranking official. This is a poor guy of twenty-four years old who could have lost even the small fortune that he had. writes that he is a rather stupid person, without a king in his head. He wanted to try his luck in the capital, but failed. On the way home, he lost all the money and he has to live in a certain town, where they are just waiting for the arrival of the auditor. Khlestakov was mistaken for him. And he quickly began to play along, especially since he always wanted to be a significant person.
Khlestakov is a dreamer, a deceitful person who thinks superficially and does not think about the consequences. Having played at being an auditor, Ivan lies about himself, inventing unprecedented stories. In his stories, he makes his dreams come true, giving them a certain reality. He does this with such conviction that even the experienced mayor did not see through the false auditor and believes him to the end. And Ivan himself believes in his lies.
The hero is a master of lies who, without a twinge of conscience, takes money from everyone, promising to return everything. This is a man who can simultaneously care for his daughter and her mother, and it is unknown how the whole story would have ended if Khlestakov had not left before the deception was revealed.
The image of Khlestakov and the hero of the comedy are the founder of Khlestakovism, which personifies frivolity, stupidity, lies, laxity, and the desire to impersonate someone else.
The image of Khlestakov in the comedy The Inspector General, version 2
The key figure and striking image in Gogol's work The Inspector General is the image of Khlestakov, who in himself was a worthless person, an ordinary typical little man. By chance, when he lost in the capital and was on his way home, Khlestakov finds himself in a town where officials mistake him for an important auditor. And here his life turns into the fairy tale that Khlestakov always dreamed of. Now everyone is interested in him, everyone wants to see him and are in awe of his person. And here the true image of Khlestakov begins to be revealed in the comedy The Inspector General about which we are writing our essay.
Image of Khlestakov with quotes
In order to more plausibly describe the main character in an essay on the topic of the image of Khlestakov, we suggest turning to quotes from the work. And we meet, as the author writes, a young twenty-three-year-old man, thin, thin, slightly stupid. According to the mayor, it is so nondescript that you could crush it with a fingernail. a poor nobleman who serves in St. Petersburg, holding the position of registrar. He takes his work carelessly, so he can skip it, but card games have always been mandatory.
Khlestakov is always combed, dressed stylishly, knows how to present himself, respects ranks, honors people from high society and despises people of low class.
He is a good actor, so he quickly gets used to the role of an auditor, as if he had been waiting for this all his life. The false inspector, having become an important person, immediately attributed to himself talents that he never had. He boasted of his connections, had conversations, and without a twinge of conscience asked for money from officials. In the successfully invented image of Khlestakov, Gogol ridiculed the vices of officials and their obscene qualities.
Khlestakov's lifestyle
What kind of life does our Khlestakov lead? From Gogol's work we see a nobleman, a landowner, who lives in a modest apartment and occupies an insignificant post, earning little money. Khlestakov leads a life beyond his means, travels to theaters, plays cards, takes money from his parents, and constantly dreams of a different life, which he observes from the outside. And how I would like to become a significant person, to feel constant attention from the ladies. He dreams of being taken for the commander-in-chief, so the incident in a small town became for Khlestakov like a fairy tale that he had dreamed about all his life, and by chance came true.
In general, Khlestakov’s lifestyle is worthless, frivolous, and does not bring any benefit to society. His whole life consists of accidents.
Khlestakov's character
While working on the essay, I would like to briefly dwell on the character of Khlestakov. This is a frivolous, irresponsible, lazy person who does not like to work. He does not strive to grow in his career, he is a spender, a liar, a frivolous playmaker, who, however, was an excellent actor. His only natural gift was luck, thanks to which Khlestakov managed to leave the city on time, while not forgetting to give precise characteristics in a letter to each of the officials of the small county town.
The meaning of the image of Khlestakov
Having studied the comedy The Inspector General, we see how important the image of Khlestakov is in Gogol’s work. Here Khlestakov not only personifies deceit and hypocrisy, and shows the spiritual emptiness that was characteristic of many of the author’s contemporaries, but is also an instrument through which the vices of officials are revealed. At the same time, the hero reveals them unconsciously. Without noticing it, he brought the officials to light, so the significance of his image in comedy is priceless.
The meaning and relevance of the image of Khlestakov
The meaning of Khlestakov’s image is quite clear. Through the image of the main character, the author wanted to ridicule the evils of society and draw the viewer's attention to the existing problems that people face. What’s most interesting is that the Khlestakovs can easily be found among us, so the question of whether the image of Khlestakov is relevant in our time can be answered positively. To confirm this, it is enough to remember who Khlestakov is.
He is a liar, enjoys using his parents’ money, loves fashionable clothes, but at the same time does not want to work and earn money. Now look around. Almost all people lie for their own benefit. How many children are there around who happily live at the expense of their parents? A lot of them. They are used to getting the best without much difficulty. Look around you, see how many people pretend to be someone they are not!
All this certainly emphasizes the relevance of Khlestakov’s image in our days.
The image of Khlestakov based on Gogol’s comedy “The Inspector General” - essay
5 (100%) 2 votes
